drx 2x0 fnatic
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.43 1.53 1.34 | 303 317 291 | 30 17 13 | / 19 9 10 / | 4 2 2 | +11 +8 +3 | 64% 79% 50% | 201 208 195 | 29% 40% 21% | 4 2 2 | 2 0 2 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.97 1.30 0.65 | 179 207 152 | 15 9 6 | / 18 8 10 / | 16 11 5 | -3 +1 -4 | 82% 93% 71% | 122 129 115 | 16% 23% 9% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.89 0.94 0.84 | 207 223 191 | 19 11 8 | / 22 11 11 / | 3 1 2 | -3 0 -3 | 71% 79% 64% | 145 151 139 | 21% 29% 15% | 4 2 2 | 3 2 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.85 0.70 1.01 | 127 115 140 | 14 6 8 | / 16 10 6 / | 2 2 0 | -2 -4 +2 | 75% 79% 71% | 88 77 99 | 28% 40% 19% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
0.71 0.73 0.70 | 175 181 170 | 15 8 7 | / 21 10 11 / | 10 2 8 | -6 -2 -4 | 61% 64% 57% | 125 127 124 | 20% 23% 18% | 3 2 1 | 6 2 4 | -3 0 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.21 1.45 0.98 | 260 289 232 | 25 15 10 | / 20 9 11 / | 5 1 4 | +5 +6 -1 | 79% 79% 79% | 182 194 170 | 31% 30% 33% | 8 4 4 | 4 1 3 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
1.09 1.07 1.11 | 234 227 241 | 21 10 11 | / 20 8 12 / | 8 1 7 | +1 +2 -1 | 71% 57% 86% | 173 151 194 | 18% 21% 16% | 4 2 2 | 3 1 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.07 0.97 1.17 | 163 141 186 | 18 6 12 | / 18 8 10 / | 6 5 1 | 0 -2 +2 | 79% 86% 71% | 108 100 116 | 27% 25% 28% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.02 1.13 0.91 | 168 194 144 | 17 11 6 | / 16 8 8 / | 6 4 2 | +1 +3 -2 | 64% 71% 57% | 105 117 93 | 15% 21% 11% | 0 0 0 | 3 3 0 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.83 0.84 0.82 | 160 142 180 | 15 7 8 | / 19 10 9 / | 10 2 8 | -4 -3 -1 | 82% 79% 86% | 117 102 132 | 22% 37% 15% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.78 1.26 1.48 | 289 343 254 | 72 37 35 | / 41 16 25 / | 12 6 6 | +31 +21 +10 | 76% 86% 68% | 186 209 169 | 30% 39% 25% | 6 3 3 | 5 1 4 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.82 1.41 1.16 | 196 132 225 | 46 13 33 | / 36 18 18 / | 16 10 6 | +10 -5 +15 | 77% 75% 79% | 124 83 154 | 27% 34% 24% | 3 0 3 | 5 4 1 | -2 -4 +2 | |
|
0.94 1.22 1.10 | 228 198 245 | 50 20 30 | / 46 20 26 / | 17 5 12 | +4 0 +4 | 76% 79% 74% | 157 135 173 | 24% 29% 22% | 9 3 6 | 5 3 2 | +4 0 +4 | |
|
1.32 0.72 0.98 | 194 232 162 | 42 22 20 | / 42 15 27 / | 29 16 13 | 0 +7 -7 | 74% 86% 66% | 120 143 104 | 17% 22% 13% | 6 1 5 | 5 2 3 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.85 0.75 0.79 | 176 196 165 | 39 20 19 | / 47 18 29 / | 18 6 12 | -8 +2 -10 | 70% 68% 71% | 121 138 109 | 25% 26% 24% | 10 5 5 | 13 6 7 | -3 -1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.11 1.00 1.06 | 245 245 252 | 54 33 21 | / 53 30 23 / | 13 5 8 | +1 +3 -2 | 68% 66% 71% | 167 160 177 | 31% 30% 32% | 18 9 9 | 11 6 5 | +7 +3 +4 | |
|
1.11 0.92 1.03 | 241 248 230 | 52 31 21 | / 51 27 24 / | 14 5 9 | +1 +4 -3 | 68% 66% 71% | 170 174 165 | 25% 25% 25% | 9 5 4 | 5 3 2 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
0.82 1.04 0.92 | 150 146 160 | 37 18 19 | / 47 27 20 / | 13 10 3 | -10 -9 -1 | 71% 74% 68% | 102 96 110 | 31% 27% 36% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.79 0.68 0.74 | 144 157 136 | 34 21 13 | / 49 29 20 / | 20 9 11 | -15 -8 -7 | 77% 76% 79% | 105 111 98 | 24% 33% 15% | 3 1 2 | 7 4 3 | -4 -3 -1 | |
|
0.81 0.63 0.73 | 147 161 138 | 34 22 12 | / 49 27 22 / | 15 10 5 | -15 -5 -10 | 70% 76% 61% | 96 103 86 | 16% 21% 10% | 2 1 1 | 8 7 1 | -6 -6 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.52 2.27 1.03 | 286 434 189 | 22 13 9 | / 13 4 9 / | 4 1 3 | +9 +9 0 | 80% 100% 67% | 177 251 127 | 33% 31% 35% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
1.20 1.00 1.33 | 198 154 228 | 15 5 10 | / 11 4 7 / | 4 1 3 | +4 +1 +3 | 75% 63% 83% | 127 100 145 | 27% 36% 24% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.08 0.56 1.43 | 241 143 308 | 16 4 12 | / 15 6 9 / | 7 2 5 | +1 -2 +3 | 75% 75% 75% | 168 102 213 | 26% 31% 24% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.04 1.13 0.97 | 220 270 188 | 16 10 6 | / 13 4 9 / | 4 1 3 | +3 +6 -3 | 75% 75% 75% | 143 176 121 | 37% 35% 39% | 5 3 2 | 4 2 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.86 1.07 0.72 | 167 179 159 | 11 5 6 | / 13 4 9 / | 12 4 8 | -2 +1 -3 | 75% 88% 67% | 106 126 93 | 14% 18% 13% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.11 1.56 0.44 | 243 315 137 | 17 13 4 | / 15 8 7 / | 3 2 1 | +2 +5 -3 | 75% 92% 50% | 160 215 77 | 25% 24% 30% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.04 1.14 0.88 | 257 264 248 | 16 11 5 | / 17 10 7 / | 6 3 3 | -1 +1 -2 | 70% 75% 63% | 175 173 178 | 31% 32% 30% | 6 4 2 | 5 3 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.80 0.62 1.08 | 127 102 165 | 9 4 5 | / 15 9 6 / | 5 3 2 | -6 -5 -1 | 65% 67% 63% | 89 62 130 | 36% 23% 47% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.76 0.78 0.72 | 170 188 144 | 12 8 4 | / 16 9 7 / | 7 4 3 | -4 -1 -3 | 85% 75% 100% | 120 131 103 | 26% 32% 17% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.57 0.68 0.41 | 149 150 150 | 10 6 4 | / 17 9 8 / | 4 3 1 | -7 -3 -4 | 80% 83% 75% | 102 108 94 | 16% 18% 14% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.60 0.87 1.96 | 262 144 322 | 17 2 15 | / 9 4 5 / | 10 7 3 | +8 -2 +10 | 83% 83% 83% | 177 77 227 | 26% 22% 27% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.53 1.74 1.42 | 279 283 277 | 20 7 13 | / 9 3 6 / | 4 3 1 | +11 +4 +7 | 89% 83% 92% | 173 156 181 | 31% 63% 25% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.44 1.44 1.44 | 236 214 247 | 15 5 10 | / 9 3 6 / | 7 2 5 | +6 +2 +4 | 83% 83% 83% | 163 144 172 | 26% 25% 26% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.11 1.71 0.81 | 236 358 176 | 16 8 8 | / 11 3 8 / | 1 1 0 | +5 +5 0 | 61% 67% 58% | 134 196 103 | 23% 24% 21% | 4 0 4 | 3 1 2 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.65 0.75 0.60 | 134 130 137 | 8 2 6 | / 13 4 9 / | 4 3 1 | -5 -2 -3 | 78% 67% 83% | 92 116 79 | 20% 21% 19% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.86 0.68 1.21 | 217 174 305 | 13 7 6 | / 16 11 5 / | 2 1 1 | -3 -4 +1 | 50% 42% 67% | 135 106 194 | 29% 27% 31% | 4 1 3 | 2 2 0 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
0.85 0.72 1.11 | 246 205 329 | 14 8 6 | / 16 11 5 / | 3 2 1 | -2 -3 +1 | 56% 50% 67% | 177 159 214 | 38% 33% 44% | 4 2 2 | 2 2 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.80 0.85 0.69 | 160 195 92 | 10 8 2 | / 14 10 4 / | 2 2 0 | -4 -2 -2 | 67% 67% 67% | 107 126 69 | 33% 32% 40% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.59 0.74 0.30 | 101 142 21 | 7 6 1 | / 14 10 4 / | 3 3 0 | -7 -4 -3 | 61% 75% 33% | 71 102 10 | 26% 29% 0% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.48 0.58 0.27 | 125 134 109 | 7 5 2 | / 16 10 6 / | 5 3 2 | -9 -5 -4 | 67% 75% 50% | 73 81 58 | 15% 25% 0% | 0 0 0 | 4 3 1 | -4 -3 -1 |
HelenKellersFoot [#8]TBD 2-1 TBD, TBD is great i just think that TBD has a great chance dont get me wrong though both teams are great'
are you delusional? TBD doesn't stand a fucking chance lmao
HaSanity [#3]Who hyped for a 5th rema…….Zzzzzzzzz
Hopefully riot can fix the format for champs and franchising, wait this is riot we’re talking about kkkkkkk
RESERVED
gerritz [#9]are you delusional? TBD doesn't stand a fucking chance lmao
Bruh, TBD got clapped by TBD three days ago, they don't stand a chance
HaSanity [#3]Who hyped for a 5th rema…….Zzzzzzzzz
Hopefully riot can fix the format for champs and franchising, wait this is riot we’re talking about kkkkkkk
Just win 🤷♂️
PoohShiesty [#62]FPX quick 2-0
FNATIC look terrible tbh
"FNATIC look terrible tbh" LEV is a good team man wtf and FNC has not lost vs FPX this year lmao they are 4-0 vs them
texraupen [#72]I understand that my flair checks out and all that, but some Fnatic fans should probably learn that nothing is eternal and one day this winstreak against FPX will end. Will it be this match, one at Champions or some other one? Who knows, that's a fun part of rivalries.
Agreed, every time fpx fnc play you never know what will happen, even in emea 2 maps went into ot and fnc barely won and now suygetsu is back as well
Anyways its gonna be a banger
Surely fpx bans icebox now
sashi [#55]FPX is gonna thrash FNC so bad, its insane how FPX played today against DRX, same form would destory FNC
4 - 0
2 EMEA teams in the top 4 as usual lmao. This stat is insane in the 5 international tournaments we have had EMEA has had 2 teams in the top 4 four times. Compare that with the only other region close to that stat is NA with two teams in the top 4 only once at masters 3. This is why EMEA is the most consistent region this is why EMEA has so meany slots. I kinda want to see FPX win this match but honestly it could go 2-1 both ways.
TheHowling03 [#78]2 EMEA teams in the top 4 as usual lmao. This stat is insane in the 5 international tournaments we have had EMEA has had 2 teams in the top 4 four times. Compare that with the only other region close to that stat is NA with two teams in the top 4 only once at masters 3. This is why EMEA is the most consistent region this is why EMEA has so meany slots. I kinda want to see FPX win this match but honestly it could go 2-1 both ways.
its because NA teams that would good do on LAN keep choking regionally, meanwhile onliners keep qualifying and doing shit on LAN
Ahmed_Fadel [#19]Fpx????????!!!!!!!!????? Wake up
Bro the way fpx played yesterday they might win masters 2
qwertyiop [#67]fnatic has 4 days to improve
FNC 2-1
It´s not even improve bro is more like rest.
they need to chill and rest man.
they are overheating sometimes when they normally are super calm and deliberate.
these last two games were amazing to watch, but were super close probably because of stress, nervousness and panic calls.
they need to fucking chill and then prepare appropriatly
SENzombs [#79]its because NA teams that would good do on LAN keep choking regionally, meanwhile onliners keep qualifying and doing shit on LAN
Yeah thats what im saying. NA has the most consistent team in the world: optic. But as a region they are not very inconsistent. Meanwhile EMEA still has ruff periods but has consistently place its teams in the top 4 in all but one events.
joellogic [#82]I don't like to make predictions, but if fnatic beaten fpx 4 times already this year, they certainly can do it again.
Unless of course they have bad stress and nervousness managment again.
they need to be calm.
they are overheating sometimes and that is costing them a lot of rounds.
Yeah idk they looked messy vs leviathan and FPX with suy are on fire so we shall see.
Matrix13e [#64]"FNATIC look terrible tbh" LEV is a good team man wtf and FNC has not lost vs FPX this year lmao they are 4-0 vs them
Zoners [#90]nah 5 - 0 is coming
wow u think fpx is going to win 5maps and drop 0? You must be a hardcore FPX fan! Fucking wanker
Volt8888 [#57]Bruh, TBD got clapped by TBD three days ago, they don't stand a chance
Nah TBD fell off ever since Warsaw Stage 4, TBD are better right now
TheHowling03 [#83]Yeah thats what im saying. NA has the most consistent team in the world: optic. But as a region they are not very inconsistent. Meanwhile EMEA still has ruff periods but has consistently place its teams in the top 4 in all but one events.
agree
I mean, fnatic cought a game against PRX, easily of one of the top favourites to win the whole thing, and then face leviatan, wich were super hungry and playing their hearts out to make an impression on the internation stage.
Fpx on the other hand beaten Northeption easily one of the worst teams in the tourney, beated Guild with they had already beaten in the EMEA playoffs (in a very close map one wich could have gone either way),
and then they beated DRX wich are known for choking when they reach a certain point in these events.
I mean... FNC road was way harder so far and they actually did good imo.
The PRX game wasnt a stomp by any means. Map one was extremely close. And even map two was a 13-10.
joellogic [#100]I can't be the only one thinking that FPX had "weaker" opponents so far.
I mean, fnatic cought a game against PRX, easily of one of the top favourites to win the whole thing, and then face leviatan, wich were super hungry and playing their hearts out to make an impression on the internation stage.
Fpx on the other hand beaten Northeption easily one of the worst teams in the tourney, beated Guild with they had already beaten in the EMEA playoffs (in a very close map one wich could have gone either way),
and then they beated DRX wich are known for choking when they reach a certain point in these events.
I mean... FNC road was way harder so far and they actually did good imo.
The PRX game wasnt a stomp by any means. Map one was extremely close. And even map two was a 13-10.
nice bait
LUPI IH SUYGETSU💪🏻😈🤙🏻MESI IH SUYGETSU😾🤜🏻🐷🤛🏻 RUBI IH SUYGETSU😾🤚🏻💣🐷CHMORI IH SUYGETSU ☠️LUPI IH SUYGETSU💪🏻😈🤙🏻MESI IH SUYGETSU😾🤜🏻🐷🤛🏻 RUBI IH SUYGETSU😾🤚🏻💣🐷CHMORI IH SUYGETSU ☠️LUPI IH SUYGETSU💪🏻😈🤙🏻MESI IH SUYGETSU😾🤜🏻🐷🤛🏻 RUBI IH SUYGETSU😾🤚🏻💣🐷CHMORI IH SUYGETSU ☠️LUPI IH SUYGETSU💪🏻😈🤙🏻MESI IH SUYGETSU😾🤜🏻🐷🤛🏻 RUBI IH SUYGETSU😾🤚🏻💣🐷CHMORI IH SUYGETSU ☠️
ComradeVonAustria [#122]fnc m1 @1.9 8-8, think boaster has something cooked up for us. love to see best uk player
u moved here from hltv ?
AVE_TRUE_TO_CAESAR [#146]Better aim + better brain, time to book a plane back to CIS bots
FPX is not exactly a CIS team
AVE_TRUE_TO_CAESAR [#146]Better aim + better brain, time to book a plane back to CIS bots
g2 fan talking about bots OMEGALUL XD XD XD XD
Razvizuha [#151]even with suygetsu getting 30 frags its not enough for them to win
yup, its a good thing they're getting knocked out. the team with more superstars is better against optic since they can shutdown single players well like they did against DRX
Haok1ng [#154]if FPX win the series I will buy all the kebabs in my city
Hope u don't live in Tokyo
Matrix13e [#64]"FNATIC look terrible tbh" LEV is a good team man wtf and FNC has not lost vs FPX this year lmao they are 4-0 vs them
xd
I knew it
LUPI IH SUYGETSU💪🏻😈🤙🏻MESI IH SUYGETSU😾🤜🏻🐷🤛🏻 RUBI IH SUYGETSU😾🤚🏻💣🐷CHMORI IH SUYGETSU ☠️LUPI IH SUYGETSU💪🏻😈🤙🏻MESI IH SUYGETSU😾🤜🏻🐷🤛🏻 RUBI IH SUYGETSU😾🤚🏻💣🐷CHMORI IH SUYGETSU ☠️LUPI IH SUYGETSU💪🏻😈🤙🏻MESI IH SUYGETSU😾🤜🏻🐷🤛🏻 RUBI IH SUYGETSU😾🤚🏻💣🐷CHMORI IH SUYGETSU ☠️LUPI IH SUYGETSU💪🏻😈🤙🏻MESI IH SUYGETSU😾🤜🏻🐷🤛🏻 RUBI IH SUYGETSU😾🤚🏻💣🐷CHMORI IH SUYGETSU ☠️
Ryker [#175]Why do fnatic always choke when they are in like top 4 ?
It's not a choke, it's a deserved loss
Still a good result for Fnatic
forsuredude [#171]losing to ange1, just disband
I've seen Ange1 play, he doesn't even use a monitor. He visualizes the map in a detailed rendering, completely in his mind. He has a biological wallhack; his godlike perception highlights all enemies within light-years. His eyes are closed as his mouse gracefully swerves across the table, making immaculate twitches as he flicks from head to head.
Olofboost [#187]I've seen Ange1 play, he doesn't even use a monitor. He visualizes the map in a detailed rendering, completely in his mind. He has a biological wallhack; his godlike perception highlights all enemies within light-years. His eyes are closed as his mouse gracefully swerves across the table, making immaculate twitches as he flicks from head to head.
I've seen Ange1 play, he doesn't even use a monitor. He visualizes the map in a detailed rendering, completely in his mind. He has a biological wallhack; his godlike perception highlights all enemies within light-years. His eyes are closed as his mouse gracefully swerves across the table, making immaculate twitches as he flicks from head to head.
forsuredude [#171]losing to ange1, just disband
I've seen Ange1 play, he doesn't even use a monitor. He visualizes the map in a detailed rendering, completely in his mind. He has a biological wallhack; his godlike perception highlights all enemies within light-years. His eyes are closed as his mouse gracefully swerves across the table, making immaculate twitches as he flicks from head to head.
Eyedd [#198]We need highlight clips. Suygetsu pulled a 1v4??? How? When?
Please vlr put highlights like hltv
It's 26th round on split. But in fact Zyppan won this, you should see it
joellogic [#100]I can't be the only one thinking that FPX had "weaker" opponents so far.
I mean, fnatic cought a game against PRX, easily of one of the top favourites to win the whole thing, and then face leviatan, wich were super hungry and playing their hearts out to make an impression on the internation stage.
Fpx on the other hand beaten Northeption easily one of the worst teams in the tourney, beated Guild with they had already beaten in the EMEA playoffs (in a very close map one wich could have gone either way),
and then they beated DRX wich are known for choking when they reach a certain point in these events.
I mean... FNC road was way harder so far and they actually did good imo.
The PRX game wasnt a stomp by any means. Map one was extremely close. And even map two was a 13-10.
NT