Anguibok
Flag: France
Registered: December 21, 2022
Last post: November 27, 2024 at 3:07 PM
Posts: 2782
1 •• 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 •• 55

Based on my bot :

  • AMER EG 45
  • AMER LOUD 32
  • AMER 100T 28
  • AMER NRG 19
  • APAC TS 16
  • AMER C9 0
  • APAC T1 -3
  • CNTW JDG -5
  • EMEA NAVI -6
  • EMEA TL -8
  • APAC RRQ -11
  • EMEA GX -13
  • EMEA KC -21
  • CNTW WOL -22
  • EMEA KOI -24
  • AMER FUR -25
  • CNTW NV -30
  • EMEA M8 -34
  • CNTW DRG -36
  • APAC ZETA -37
  • CNTW TYL -41
  • CNTW AG -42
  • EMEA BBL -42
  • CNTW TEC -43
  • AMER MIBR -47
  • APAC GE -55
  • APAC BLD -72
  • APAC DFM -92

Top 4 amer is mental

posted 3 months ago

Myself

posted 3 months ago

I think in that scenario partenered T2 shouldn't be more helped by Riot more than any T2 roster, because if not... Well the concurrence gonna be distorded

Anywat, if Riot see they do no effort, they might remove their T2 partnership

Not 100% sure a lot of pertenered T2 team will win a lot of money with that to be fair, maybe the reach balance

posted 3 months ago

I tend to agree with that, and technically it's now the cage, since a T1 team can have an acadmy team in T2 at least they have 3 women.

Classical T2 teams with 5 man is a more complex subjet, I don't see any problem with them competing in T2, BUT, i'm not 100% sure they should participate to ascention (Or should be release in case they won), in case of a woman team qual the structure should be allowed to keep their GC team, but they should play each other at round 1 to be sure no team will loose on purpose in end of season

posted 3 months ago

Faria don't want more team for validate reason (more game would just plsit the fanbase and make a burnout), 20 is too mush, 2 ascended team is not enough, 16 is a good compromise because it make easier to make a format for the kickoff, a mix between swiss and double elim would be optimal (you've got 4 team with 1 loose and 3 win after 4 round)

One of my weird dream is to make less round in a side (10 or maybe even 8), for making slightly shorter game and allow more team without up the broadcast time (and allow more BO5, and make soloQ a little bit less, and reduce the number of round for a remontada and give more suspens and many other reason to be fair), but thats just me being weird

posted 3 months ago

I think I have the level of an Iron and my gameplay is the total opposite T.T

I think the fact is you will find people playing gun at everyELO but more you up and more the proportion of people using brain will augment

posted 3 months ago

So a team that won champ may be eliminated and a team that finished last could stay ? I dislike this idea
20 teams is too mush, my dream would be to have 10 partener and 6 ascended

posted 3 months ago

Bring clouted org in T2 by giving them certitude they will stay forever might bring people in T2

posted 3 months ago

Org that accept to invest in T2 should be partnered and safe from relegation.
In that scenario, maybe every T2 should go to 16 team like in APAC.
This offer stand only for the first 6 or 8 structure that accept this offer.

2 group of 8, one group is partnered team safe from relegation, 2nd group is the group of promoted team that bottom 3 is relegated, top 3 of each group go to PO

posted 3 months ago

In lol it was basically :

  • Iron/Bronse/Silver : Low ELO (50-60% worst player)
    Skin reward is use as a threshold
  • Gold/Platine/LowDiam : Mid ELO (top 50-60)
    Allowance to be hire in pro team based on level used as a threshold (IIRC it was D3 not 100% sure)
  • HighDiam/Master/GM/ (Top 2%)

We don't have threshold in Val sadfully, but we can transpose the percent in each categories, if we transpose that repartition to Val we have :

  • Low ELO : Iron/Bronze/Argent/LowGold (Bottom 43% if you take silver only and 64% if you take gold its bottom 64%)
  • Mid ELO : highGold/Platine/Diam/Asc
  • High ELO : Immo/Rad (top 2%)
posted 3 months ago

Did you call me ?

posted 3 months ago

unranked level 400

posted 3 months ago

They literally do it in LoL, you get skin for being gold, and you get skin for free with the Hextech mecanism and event reward.

The problem of Val it's they are not enough possibility of Skin because they are no agent skin

posted 3 months ago

In lol it was basically :

  • Iron/Bronse/Silver : Low ELO (50-60% worst player)
    Skin reward is use as a threshold
  • Gold/Platine/LowDiam : Mid ELO (top 50-60)
    Allowance to be hire in pro team based on level used as a threshold (IIRC it was D3 not 100% sure)
  • HighDiam/Master/GM/ (Top 2%)

We don't have threshold in Val sadfully, but we can transpose the percent in each categories, if we transpose that repartition to Val we have :

  • Low ELO : Iron/Bronze/Argent/LowGold (Bottom 43% if you take silver only and 64% if you take gold its bottom 64%)
  • Mid ELO : highGold/Platine/Diam/Asc
  • High ELO : Immo/Rad (top 2%)
posted 3 months ago

The fact probably 95% of SEN hater come from SEN fan is hilarious

posted 3 months ago

Where are unranked level 300 ?

posted 3 months ago

South India better ?

posted 3 months ago

New Delays :c

posted 3 months ago

Qualify for 2025

posted 3 months ago

Not even in New Dehli ?

posted 3 months ago

Kinda, they had a really disapointing Stage 2, 2-3 in group and 2-2 in playoffs

posted 3 months ago

Poweranking based on my bot

  • G2 105
  • GEN 97
  • FNC 93
  • TH 91
  • EDG 79
  • DRX 78
  • LEV 74
  • PRX 71
  • SEN 67
  • TE 43
  • VIT 30
  • FUT 24
  • KRU 11
  • FPX 3
  • TLN -16
  • BLG -23

Thought ?

You can try to beat the bot here https://www.vlr.gg/379066/bet-on-odd-final-s04

posted 3 months ago

Continentally EDG, but we know that the best team continentally may not be the best team internationally

posted 3 months ago

Go for it !

posted 3 months ago

https://x.com/FFLose/status/1822698497755304270
We ended 4th in the almost medal table, and that everything that count !

posted 3 months ago

We usually perf way lower than britain no ?
We ended 8th last times

posted 3 months ago

Isnt our best result since ever ?

posted 3 months ago

Are you not from norfolk Island ?

posted 3 months ago

Dont worry bro everyone is

posted 3 months ago

I was thinking more about a pseudo 6man like TH

posted 3 months ago

Only acceptable change is a 6 man roster or a change of philosophy of the coach

posted 3 months ago

832 --> 832
Round 4

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

1000 --> 1278
Round 4

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

938 --> 938
Round 4

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

941 --> 941
Round 4

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

1000 --> 1006,06

Round 4

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

1000 --> 1278

Round 4

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

893 --> 596

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

954 --> 683,5

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

1000 --> 596

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

918 --> 833

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

956,8 --> 956,8
Round 4

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

438 --> -110 I'm sorry T.T

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

721 --> 824

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

1357,6 --> 1357,6

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

870 --> 351

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

1199,5 --> 1185,5

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

795 --> 795

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

721 --> 827

  • [1,83] DRX - SEN [2,21] (DRX 55%)
  • [2,87] TE - EDG [1,53] (EDG 65%)
  • [1,58] G2 - LEV [2,71] (G2 63%)
  • [2,03] TH - FNC [1,97] (FNC 51%)
posted 3 months ago

fail

posted 3 months ago
1 •• 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 •• 55