BR > APAC = KR = NA >= JP > EMEA >>> LATAM
EMEA without Gambit & FPX
if they included, it will be:
EMEA >= BR > APAC = KR = NA >= JP >>> LATAM
No.
EU >> NA >> KR >= BR >> APAC >> JP >= LATAM
EU still top 1 even playing bad this masters. NA still strong but sadly GUARD shocked.
KR and BR I'd say they're at same level imo. both regions only 1 good team. I hope VK to create a super team as well to evolve more.
JP is evolving but their aim still not like KR players but their fracture is good, I still think Japan as fluke just like what happened with KRU + most teams literally ignored japan just to out aim them but failed because they tried to out aim against good tatics + team work mainly in the fracture... KRU last year played without any weight on shoulders so they got really far just like Japan is doing because Japan are focusing in Champions not in Masters just like LOUD, they're building LAN experience.
APAC is always a surprise where you can't read them, if you think too much u get destroyed by them + destroyed by your own mind.
LATAM is falling because brazilians are braindead if you have contraditory opnion.
When I think about the level of jp kr br laltm as a region, there is too much difference between jp kr br laltm and the top except for the top team.
Therefore, I would suggest
EMEA>>>>>NA>=APAC>BR=KR>>JP=laltm
If we were to compare the top teams in each region
FPX(FNC and M3C feel about the same level)>loud>=optic>DRX>PRX>>Zeta=KRU
Check the rest of the LCQ tournament, they won Furia, Liberty and Sharks before choking, they have an incredible potential but they get too nervous at the most important matches :/ if they improve on dealing with that pressure, they will beat almost everyone in the region.
PD: you guys have to stop basing your thoughts on which team beated which other, resultist arguments are not that strong