hopefully sentinels vs team vikings
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.24 0.94 1.44 | 266 236 287 | 19 7 12 | / 13 5 8 / | 4 0 4 | +6 +2 +4 | 70% 63% 75% | 141 100 169 | 21% 50% 11% | 3 1 2 | 3 0 3 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.22 0.68 1.58 | 318 214 388 | 21 6 15 | / 17 7 10 / | 3 0 3 | +4 -1 +5 | 70% 75% 67% | 187 125 229 | 14% 19% 13% | 5 2 3 | 4 2 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.20 1.18 1.21 | 202 188 212 | 15 5 10 | / 9 3 6 / | 3 0 3 | +6 +2 +4 | 85% 75% 92% | 100 83 111 | 2% 0% 3% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.98 1.30 0.78 | 171 211 146 | 12 7 5 | / 12 3 9 / | 11 0 11 | 0 +4 -4 | 80% 88% 75% | 85 92 80 | 19% 38% 8% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.65 1.12 0.34 | 139 224 84 | 10 7 3 | / 13 5 8 / | 8 4 4 | -3 +2 -5 | 60% 75% 50% | 80 118 54 | 25% 33% 14% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.14 1.43 0.70 | 260 306 194 | 16 12 4 | / 15 8 7 / | 4 3 1 | +1 +4 -3 | 55% 67% 38% | 174 202 131 | 41% 48% 29% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
1.01 0.84 1.28 | 181 134 252 | 11 4 7 | / 13 7 6 / | 5 5 0 | -2 -3 +1 | 70% 75% 63% | 129 108 161 | 11% 10% 13% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.91 0.86 0.98 | 215 217 214 | 14 9 5 | / 16 10 6 / | 3 3 0 | -2 -1 -1 | 55% 58% 50% | 140 152 123 | 21% 20% 25% | 5 3 2 | 2 2 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.74 1.09 0.22 | 193 253 105 | 13 11 2 | / 16 9 7 / | 6 3 3 | -3 +2 -5 | 65% 83% 38% | 102 156 21 | 16% 19% 0% | 1 1 0 | 3 0 3 | -2 +1 -3 | |
|
0.66 0.57 0.79 | 165 161 174 | 10 6 4 | / 17 11 6 / | 2 1 1 | -7 -5 -2 | 75% 83% 63% | 110 111 110 | 21% 20% 24% | 2 1 1 | 3 2 1 | -1 -1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.95 1.70 1.41 | 288 246 313 | 40 13 27 | / 22 11 11 / | 6 0 6 | +18 +2 +16 | 77% 67% 83% | 162 138 177 | 18% 34% 11% | 7 2 5 | 6 2 4 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.13 1.45 1.33 | 279 242 304 | 38 14 24 | / 26 11 15 / | 10 3 7 | +12 +3 +9 | 82% 87% 79% | 157 108 188 | 18% 24% 16% | 6 2 4 | 5 2 3 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.16 1.43 1.33 | 240 236 241 | 34 12 22 | / 18 9 9 / | 7 2 5 | +16 +3 +13 | 87% 80% 92% | 127 97 147 | 22% 9% 30% | 5 2 3 | 0 0 0 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
0.89 0.93 0.92 | 162 180 151 | 22 10 12 | / 24 10 14 / | 18 3 15 | -2 0 -2 | 72% 67% 75% | 90 91 89 | 17% 31% 10% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.89 0.62 0.72 | 144 196 112 | 19 10 9 | / 23 10 13 / | 13 7 6 | -4 0 -4 | 67% 73% 63% | 89 114 74 | 15% 20% 10% | 4 3 1 | 2 1 1 | +2 +2 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.26 0.82 1.09 | 247 269 215 | 29 19 10 | / 29 17 12 / | 5 3 2 | 0 +2 -2 | 62% 63% 60% | 165 185 133 | 32% 36% 26% | 3 3 0 | 3 2 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.75 0.89 0.80 | 159 129 209 | 18 8 10 | / 29 17 12 / | 8 6 2 | -11 -9 -2 | 59% 58% 60% | 112 99 132 | 16% 14% 19% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.91 0.58 0.78 | 182 193 165 | 25 17 8 | / 31 18 13 / | 10 4 6 | -6 -1 -5 | 62% 71% 47% | 102 120 73 | 24% 25% 24% | 1 1 0 | 7 1 6 | -6 0 -6 | |
|
0.33 1.28 0.70 | 155 109 230 | 21 8 13 | / 32 22 10 / | 6 3 3 | -11 -14 +3 | 62% 54% 73% | 97 77 129 | 25% 21% 29% | 3 1 2 | 7 6 1 | -4 -5 +1 | |
|
0.58 0.87 0.69 | 171 148 212 | 20 11 9 | / 32 20 12 / | 8 4 4 | -12 -9 -3 | 51% 42% 67% | 115 111 121 | 23% 23% 24% | 6 3 3 | 5 5 0 | +1 -2 +3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.59 0.95 1.96 | 309 258 340 | 21 6 15 | / 9 6 3 / | 2 0 2 | +12 0 +12 | 84% 71% 92% | 184 182 185 | 16% 25% 11% | 4 1 3 | 3 2 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
1.46 1.15 1.65 | 277 290 270 | 19 7 12 | / 9 6 3 / | 4 2 2 | +10 +1 +9 | 89% 86% 92% | 157 112 183 | 46% 23% 57% | 4 2 2 | 0 0 0 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
1.43 1.64 1.31 | 239 274 219 | 17 8 9 | / 9 4 5 / | 7 3 4 | +8 +4 +4 | 95% 100% 92% | 126 89 148 | 27% 33% 24% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.85 0.43 1.09 | 152 146 157 | 10 3 7 | / 12 7 5 / | 7 3 4 | -2 -4 +2 | 63% 43% 75% | 95 91 98 | 16% 25% 12% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.80 0.61 0.90 | 148 164 139 | 9 3 6 | / 10 5 5 / | 5 3 2 | -1 -2 +1 | 74% 71% 75% | 99 109 94 | 8% 9% 8% | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | +3 +2 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.04 1.08 0.96 | 234 233 239 | 13 7 6 | / 14 9 5 / | 1 0 1 | -1 -2 +1 | 68% 58% 86% | 155 167 135 | 24% 25% 24% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.83 0.73 1.00 | 170 133 235 | 12 6 6 | / 15 9 6 / | 4 1 3 | -3 -3 0 | 58% 58% 57% | 102 84 132 | 34% 38% 32% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
0.74 0.08 1.85 | 144 57 294 | 11 2 9 | / 15 11 4 / | 4 2 2 | -4 -9 +5 | 47% 25% 86% | 84 44 152 | 31% 25% 33% | 1 0 1 | 4 4 0 | -3 -4 +1 | |
|
0.57 0.65 0.43 | 136 123 160 | 7 4 3 | / 16 10 6 / | 3 1 2 | -9 -6 -3 | 47% 42% 57% | 94 90 100 | 26% 21% 33% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.46 0.30 0.74 | 127 80 210 | 6 2 4 | / 16 10 6 / | 5 1 4 | -10 -8 -2 | 47% 25% 86% | 87 69 119 | 26% 29% 23% | 1 0 1 | 3 3 0 | -2 -3 +1 |
why did u think that vks will ban haven? in my thoughts vks are baning split all the stage. sacy said in plat chat that they have a good haven(and prove it on the VCT BR Grand Finals winning agains Sharks), but split they only play one time this year. My opinion: VKS Ban Split, SEN Ban Bind, VKS pick Ascent, SEN pick Haven, Icebox remains.
VKS 2-0 Sentinels (60% vs 40%)
VKS has better players and makes much less mistakes, has better meta reading and makes better decisions.
Or
VKS 2-1 Fnatic (50% vs 50%)
Anyone can win and for me they are the two best teams in the tournament, I believe that Fnatic is a team with better tactical preparation but VKS is better individually and Saadhak will make a difference here, I believe that Fnatic players can underperform on LAN.
It's really hard to judge how BR compares to NA. They don't scrim together, and have different playstyles. Players from both regions are incredibly talented. I thought vks was in good form after they dumpstered TL in scrims but then Liquid lost to V1, so that doesnt really help. Vks fumbled against X10, looking kinda shabby. SEN however beat FNATIC 2-0. Based off of this I'm going to say SEN 2-1, but anything could happen. All I'm hoping for is a great match! Good luck to br and vks fans, let's hope for a banger of a match.
A parceiro quem nunca jogou na selva valorosa não tem moral nenhuma pra falar do verdadeiro Valorant Alegria.
É duar bala do MW, Heat voando pra todo lado, Aspas girando girando & girando
Telada do Windows Down, QePooy de judge todo round
Hastad e Fluyr reclamando de GHOST & poti xingando quem pede complete
Pra quem vive isso todo dia Sentinels é só mais um livro a ser lido
VAI CARECA
Se quiser sair na mão é só traduzir, aqui procês que vou falar em inglês
From scrimbux I thought Vikings were better than Sentinels. But the game against X10 was looking rough for them. If they try to pull that mid aggressive shit against SEN they gonna get boomed. SEN probably gonna take this 2-1. But I think whoever loses this is gonna have a lower bracket run and get into Finals or lower bracket finals atleast.
VKS will surprise everybody, people are thinking the wrong way, VKS wasn't bad, ASIA that is actually very good, Crazy Raccoon gave V1 a lot of trouble and then V1 destroyed Liquid, X10 gave VKS a lot of trouble and they are actually better than Crazy raccoon, going by that logic VKS level is similar or superior than that of V1, wich means they are on par with SEN and this match is gonna be very balanced.