acend era? | VLR.gg

#1

s1mple_valorant_killer69

only good at lan but trash online the valorant navi/g2?

#2

SwindL

10

Frags

+

–

acend era never happened bro they just won champions gambit is the era

#3

asdfgh

10

Frags

+

–

and how tf is getting 1nd 2nd a "era" lmao,literally 2 tournaments

#4

delusional_sentinels_fan1

-2

Frags

+

–

Gambit won almost every regional event they played (it is CIS though)

#5

asdfgh

16

Frags

+

–

bruh cis is like free tournaments for them ofc they dont count

#22

TacoTreyKirby

-2

Frags

+

–

you can only play who's in front of you, not their fault

#23

asdfgh

0

Frags

+

–

when did i say its their fault lol

#16

Yeetus

4

Frags

+

–

sentineLs won every regional event they played last year

#26

delusional_sentinels_fan1

-1

Frags

+

–

sorry but what does that have to do with what I said? SEN didn't do shit in the last two LANs whilst gambit won masters 3 and were grand finalists in champs.

#27

kristof

0

Frags

+

–

2nd place means they are not the best

#6

PrTsty

-1

Frags

+

–

First emea finals, masters 1 winner, masters 3 winner, champs finalist

Not an era yet but if they win 2 out of the next 3 LANs its an ERA imo

#7

asdfgh

4

Frags

+

–

valorant doesnt even have enough tournaments for anyone to establish a era

#8

PrTsty

-1

Frags

+

–

I mean if you win masters 1 + 2 and cgamps then its an ERA

#11

asdfgh

0

Frags

+

–

yeah,but idk if any team will do that

#13

egg80085

0

Frags

+

–

tsm in 2023 copium

#17

sebert112

1

Frags

+

–

nice qual to challengers 1 bro

#18

Sikko

1

Frags

+

–

Winning for one season isn't really an ERA, you have to win in multiple seasons for it to be considered an ERA. Personally, people are too fixed on this ERA thing, we had sentinel ERA, gambit ERA, ascent ERA all within a year almost as if any team wins a major we start calling it an ERA. Maybe relax a bit?

#20

PrTsty

0

Frags

+

–

I dont really care about era or not, I'd just call it tripple or double (if they win mulitple masters/chanmps in a year)
and yeah I'd start calling it an Era when a team wins almost everything for 2 seasons+

#24

DvyY

0

Frags

+

–

In this game probably won't even be someones era. This isn't cs, where almost everything is the same for years. Here are meta changes and new agents in addition to the game. That's why one team will win 1-2 events in a row and than will any other team appear and does the same. It's just about how you catch the meta, how it fits your teamplay and playstyle.

#9

CRAZY_CHAINSAW_MAN_FAN

1

Frags

+

–

no team has had an era yet except maybe regional "eras" but those don't matter as much

#10

Vividogre

1

Frags

+

–

One map andy KEKW

#12

FsJaredFan

1

Frags

+

–

no team has an era really except for some regional tournaments but this game is too random for one team to constantly be the best in the world

#14

asdfgh

1

Frags

+

–

also zeek and kiles are playing like bots atm and all smb on full onliner xantarespeek mode

#15

emirerays

0

Frags

+

–

OK

#19

frake_monster

0

Frags

+

–

Bro there is only 3 LANs a year and there is no team era in valorant. I don't think any team will have an era in valorant. It is so hard to do. If Gambit wins Champions and Masters we could say they have an era. Same goes to any other team.

There aren't a lot of LAN events happening in VALORANT. 3 LAN's a year is bad. We need 5-6 at least

#21

arecyc

0

Frags

+

–

no one has era

#25

SuperRoss

0

Frags

+

–

Yea, acend have been amongst the top teams since they beat th in that final, the hype is deserved and they're an incredible team, even if composed by only a single player in cned