only good at lan but trash online the valorant navi/g2?
SwindL [#2]acend era never happened bro they just won champions gambit is the era
and how tf is getting 1nd 2nd a "era" lmao,literally 2 tournaments
asdfgh [#3]and how tf is getting 1nd 2nd a "era" lmao,literally 2 tournaments
Gambit won almost every regional event they played (it is CIS though)
delusional_sentinels_fan1 [#4]Gambit won almost every regional event they played (it is CIS though)
bruh cis is like free tournaments for them ofc they dont count
asdfgh [#3]and how tf is getting 1nd 2nd a "era" lmao,literally 2 tournaments
First emea finals, masters 1 winner, masters 3 winner, champs finalist
Not an era yet but if they win 2 out of the next 3 LANs its an ERA imo
PrTsty [#6]First emea finals, masters 1 winner, masters 3 winner, champs finalist
Not an era yet but if they win 2 out of the next 3 LANs its an ERA imo
valorant doesnt even have enough tournaments for anyone to establish a era
asdfgh [#7]valorant doesnt even have enough tournaments for anyone to establish a era
I mean if you win masters 1 + 2 and cgamps then its an ERA
PrTsty [#8]I mean if you win masters 1 + 2 and cgamps then its an ERA
yeah,but idk if any team will do that
delusional_sentinels_fan1 [#4]Gambit won almost every regional event they played (it is CIS though)
sentineLs won every regional event they played last year
PrTsty [#8]I mean if you win masters 1 + 2 and cgamps then its an ERA
Winning for one season isn't really an ERA, you have to win in multiple seasons for it to be considered an ERA. Personally, people are too fixed on this ERA thing, we had sentinel ERA, gambit ERA, ascent ERA all within a year almost as if any team wins a major we start calling it an ERA. Maybe relax a bit?
Bro there is only 3 LANs a year and there is no team era in valorant. I don't think any team will have an era in valorant. It is so hard to do. If Gambit wins Champions and Masters we could say they have an era. Same goes to any other team.
There aren't a lot of LAN events happening in VALORANT. 3 LAN's a year is bad. We need 5-6 at least
Sikko [#18]Winning for one season isn't really an ERA, you have to win in multiple seasons for it to be considered an ERA. Personally, people are too fixed on this ERA thing, we had sentinel ERA, gambit ERA, ascent ERA all within a year almost as if any team wins a major we start calling it an ERA. Maybe relax a bit?
I dont really care about era or not, I'd just call it tripple or double (if they win mulitple masters/chanmps in a year)
and yeah I'd start calling it an Era when a team wins almost everything for 2 seasons+
asdfgh [#5]bruh cis is like free tournaments for them ofc they dont count
you can only play who's in front of you, not their fault
TacoTreyKirby [#22]you can only play who's in front of you, not their fault
when did i say its their fault lol
SwindL [#2]acend era never happened bro they just won champions gambit is the era
In this game probably won't even be someones era. This isn't cs, where almost everything is the same for years. Here are meta changes and new agents in addition to the game. That's why one team will win 1-2 events in a row and than will any other team appear and does the same. It's just about how you catch the meta, how it fits your teamplay and playstyle.
Yeetus [#16]sentineLs won every regional event they played last year
sorry but what does that have to do with what I said? SEN didn't do shit in the last two LANs whilst gambit won masters 3 and were grand finalists in champs.
delusional_sentinels_fan1 [#26]sorry but what does that have to do with what I said? SEN didn't do shit in the last two LANs whilst gambit won masters 3 and were grand finalists in champs.
2nd place means they are not the best