Dec 6 2024 tier list:
https://imgur.com/a/rsvyqWe
0
Fight me
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
Are you just being a goofball or being a narrate word? How does being falsely banned by the notoriously evil anti cheat discount my credibility at all? There's tons of people who watch valorant games yet don't play the game. Plus, it's hardly an opinion, I was just pointing something out that i found a little odd so i'll take narrate word.
LMAO sure buddy. Vanguard is literally the best anti-cheat out there and everybody knows. It won't just ban you for absolutely no reason. SURELY you must've done something. If vehemently monitoring the system to keep out cheaters like you makes the anti-cheat notoriously evil, then it's just as Shanks said, I'm feeling evil today, live evil.
The villains of Gotham also consider Batman to be evil.
Bug bounty is a thing that EVERY anti-cheat does. It's to showcase how confident the devs are in their product + they're willing to go that far to fix the problems. The fact that you don't know about that proves that you know nothing about acs and you're probably just yapping. Public admittance. Also, just because Vanguard bugged out once only for you, suddenly it's ass? Lmao cool story bro.
No shit, sherlock. Vanguard has a notorious problem of not being a quick-acting anti-cheat and having various bugs that are not being patched just so they can make their newest 100-dollar skin bundle that people buy. They list this here, and it's clear that they are legitimately trying to find the vast amount of loopholes and ways to bypass their shitty anti-cheat. I don't understand how you can infer all of that from a minuscule bug bounty. Additionally there are multiple blatant instances of the anti-cheat just failing to work here, and here. The rakkastakka guy played 110 games with cheats and vanguard failed to ban him. He posted clips of himself blatantly cheating on twitter. Enough for you?
They are not a quick acting anti cheat because they collect data. I thought everybody knew this? The page you provided is literally a bounty page. What is that even supposed to prove? You think bug bounties are posted because the devs are lazy to fix the problems themselves, and not because they are 95% confident that their system is solid? If you think that then you're free to do so, but that is literally not true.
They let Rakkastakka cheat, just like how they let every other 1 or 2 cheater cheat a few games, before they eventually ban them and someone like them NEVER appears again for a long time.
You acting like you know shit is not getting you any more attention. 0/8. Also, 110 games are about 9 times more than Vanguard should need for an accurate sample size. Like, come on, man, read past the first sentence, look at my data point, and provide your own data. What are your sources? You stating some bs out of your ass ain't making you look better or making me inclined to agree with your argument.
The link to the bounty page genuinely proves that they aren't confident in their anti-cheat and need some developing help if they're willing to pay 100k for certain things like creating a botnet and Ddosing val servers and Vanguard. Also, keep whining holy and stop editing shit to make you look better.
he may cheat but at least he has a valid opinion unlike whatever opinion you have.
also, joker knows what hes doing is bad and just wants attention from batman. additionally, he knows batman isnt evil and tries to break him and get him to fall to the dark side. u dont even know dc lore and you are talking about valorant lmao.
Discord