Hyporcsy about SEN

#1

Hades_Loves_Rb

(THIS IS NOT EVERYONE mostly see this on X)
Same ppl saying that Kamo did horrible shit, should be banned from the leauge etc defend Narrate for saying the same shit
Same ppl saying ban Chet/deserved defend JohnQT saying it was an accident etc

Its always these SEN defenders that are the biggest hypocrites. Not all SEN fans are hypocrites, but the majority of hypocirtes are SEN fans

#2

thenutoriousPRO

0

Frags

+

–

what did johnqt do lol

#4

cloudberry

4

Frags

+

–

He accidentally made a scrim VOD against Leviatán public a few days back, which is where we got rubkkoide to LEV from

#6

AlexSMTx

4

Frags

+

–

tbh what's saving him is basically that LEV and the owner just don't really care about him leaking it. I imagine had LEV complained he would've gotten some trouble at least

#13

1243

-1

Frags

+

–

no riot wouldn't get mad at him or anything, the best people can do is not scrim or blacklist sen if they did care, riot wouldn't be involved in anyway

#16

1243

-1

Frags

+

–

for the people down voting this, teams have literally leaked scrims and have not been punished by riot one time, that's because riot can't do anything, they don't have the rights to do anything if scrims are leaked

#7

thenutoriousPRO

6

Frags

+

–

chet only got in trouble cuz it was an official riot game and only riot got mad at him, not the same at all
plus 90% of the sen fans who hate on kamo also got mad at n4rrate
and also what kamo did is wayyyy worse than saying one word lmao
i hate sen fans but this is a stretch

#9

cloudberry

0

Frags

+

–

I agree, I'm just explaining what happened

#3

Alr3adyGone

6

Frags

+

–

Chet live streamed and reviewed a riot sanctioned match, John accidentally posted a scrim that he deleted promptly and even Levs owner said he didn't care. 2 very different situations

#8

teilwal

-1

Frags

+

–

nrg said they didnt care

#11

1243

1

Frags

+

–

it doesn't matter if nrg didn't care, it's riot content, using it without permission will obviously get you in trouble, this is like adult 101, do not use things owned by others without their permission especially for self beneficial monetary purposes

#19

Eileenleen

0

Frags

+

–

NRG has no say in it. Even NRG has to get approval from Riot to use the footages in their comms videos. No approval=no authorization to show the footage.

#5

NA_BEST_COUNTRY

4

Frags

+

–

Kamo controversies are nowhere even close to n4rrate's get a grip

#10

Genieinthebottle

2

Frags

+

–

Those things are not comparable bro

#12

jupiterr

0

Frags

+

–

What did Kamo do

#15

Genieinthebottle

1

Frags

+

–

https://escorenews.com/en/valorant/news/35253-valorant-player-kamo-suspended-for-accusations-of-racism-and-asking-intimate-photos-from-a-minor

#17

jupiterr

0

Frags

+

–

Thanks

#14

Pras1mos

0

Frags

+

–

Not all the Sen fans, but allways a Sen fan.

#18

Eileenleen

5

Frags

+

–

Are we really comparing :
1) someone saying one stupid thing vs someone saying racial slurs AND sexually harassing a girl
2) someone purposefully leaking a vod with comms that's only available on a riot platform that NEEDS an approval from Riot (against the rules) vs someone accidentally uploading a scrim (his own footage, not against the rules, just frowned upon) and immediately deleting it?

Surely we are not stupid enough not to realize these are absolutely not the same things right ?

#20

Genieinthebottle

1

Frags

+

–

Yeah, not everyone here is smart

#21

Lucrix

0

Frags

+

–

chet one is stupid bc he was part of the team and the team had already made a com video using that footage but wtv

#22

Eileenleen

0

Frags

+

–

It doesn't really matter. Riot is the only one who can give the ok to release the content. And the comms videos are only snippets from a whole vod anyway.

#23

1243

0

Frags

+

–

buddy do you think chet = nrg, cuz it sure isn't that way legally, nrg is a seperate legal entity, if nrg made comms they had permission, chet is naive to think "oh nrg made comms, i can too" this is like saying if a company buys rights to a trademark, it belongs to an employee, a person must be stupid to think this

#24

Lucrix

-1

Frags

+

–

i mean what he did was wrong, but it wasn't that big of a deal ngl

#25

1243

0

Frags

+

–

it's just legally wrong, i don't think it's that bad, but legally it's punishable and they wanted to make an example out of it