g2 fell off so hard
100t 2-0
G2
100T
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.07 1.04 1.09 | 171 147 191 | 11 4 7 | / 13 5 8 / | 16 7 9 | -2 -1 -1 | 86% 90% 83% | 118 112 123 | 18% 12% 23% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.06 0.80 1.29 | 233 190 270 | 16 6 10 | / 17 8 9 / | 18 7 11 | -1 -2 +1 | 82% 80% 83% | 151 121 177 | 37% 38% 36% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.97 1.03 0.93 | 204 200 209 | 17 8 9 | / 15 7 8 / | 7 5 2 | +2 +1 +1 | 82% 80% 83% | 117 94 137 | 24% 26% 23% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.95 0.67 1.17 | 225 194 252 | 17 6 11 | / 17 8 9 / | 4 0 4 | 0 -2 +2 | 68% 60% 75% | 136 129 142 | 21% 32% 15% | 4 1 3 | 5 3 2 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.93 1.57 0.40 | 186 270 117 | 13 10 3 | / 15 5 10 / | 6 2 4 | -2 +5 -7 | 59% 70% 50% | 129 171 94 | 37% 58% 18% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.34 1.05 1.68 | 235 162 323 | 18 6 12 | / 14 8 6 / | 15 11 4 | +4 -2 +6 | 77% 67% 90% | 156 122 198 | 30% 30% 29% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.32 1.48 1.13 | 204 212 195 | 18 10 8 | / 12 6 6 / | 4 3 1 | +6 +4 +2 | 68% 58% 80% | 130 123 138 | 28% 24% 33% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
1.17 1.58 0.68 | 224 315 117 | 17 14 3 | / 15 8 7 / | 8 2 6 | +2 +6 -4 | 77% 92% 60% | 143 187 91 | 35% 48% 17% | 2 1 1 | 2 0 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.04 1.11 0.95 | 174 196 148 | 14 9 5 | / 16 8 8 / | 5 2 3 | -2 +1 -3 | 82% 83% 80% | 116 122 109 | 30% 25% 38% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.54 0.29 0.85 | 147 129 169 | 10 5 5 | / 17 10 7 / | 5 1 4 | -7 -5 -2 | 45% 33% 60% | 105 85 128 | 16% 15% 17% | 5 3 2 | 8 6 2 | -3 -3 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.95 1.33 1.14 | 246 224 269 | 35 17 18 | / 33 17 16 / | 23 10 13 | +2 0 +2 | 72% 68% 76% | 162 142 183 | 35% 33% 38% | 3 0 3 | 4 3 1 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
1.04 0.79 0.92 | 193 194 192 | 27 15 12 | / 31 14 17 / | 8 2 6 | -4 +1 -5 | 65% 68% 62% | 130 119 141 | 30% 38% 25% | 3 2 1 | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.99 0.81 0.90 | 153 163 143 | 20 11 9 | / 27 12 15 / | 25 11 14 | -7 -1 -6 | 79% 82% 76% | 103 114 91 | 16% 11% 24% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.81 0.96 0.88 | 165 137 197 | 29 12 17 | / 30 15 15 / | 8 6 2 | -1 -3 +2 | 74% 68% 81% | 98 82 115 | 26% 30% 24% | 6 2 4 | 3 1 2 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.62 0.89 0.75 | 179 159 203 | 24 11 13 | / 32 16 16 / | 11 5 6 | -8 -5 -3 | 67% 68% 67% | 117 109 126 | 19% 20% 18% | 6 2 4 | 12 8 4 | -6 -6 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.41 1.10 1.25 | 193 215 172 | 33 18 15 | / 23 11 12 / | 7 5 2 | +10 +7 +3 | 70% 67% 73% | 127 136 118 | 27% 24% 31% | 3 0 3 | 1 1 0 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
1.18 1.29 1.24 | 229 202 255 | 34 15 19 | / 28 14 14 / | 22 13 9 | +6 +1 +5 | 77% 71% 82% | 153 136 169 | 24% 26% 22% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.29 1.15 1.22 | 215 266 168 | 31 20 11 | / 25 15 10 / | 21 6 15 | +6 +5 +1 | 79% 81% 77% | 138 157 120 | 28% 40% 19% | 5 3 2 | 3 1 2 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.70 1.27 0.99 | 224 193 251 | 31 13 18 | / 30 16 14 / | 11 4 7 | +1 -3 +4 | 58% 52% 64% | 154 130 176 | 20% 29% 14% | 12 5 7 | 13 9 4 | -1 -4 +3 | |
|
0.87 0.88 0.88 | 147 151 144 | 23 12 11 | / 29 14 15 / | 7 3 4 | -6 -2 -4 | 74% 86% 64% | 98 93 103 | 25% 21% 30% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 |
G2
100T
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.21 1.09 1.37 | 258 251 269 | 19 11 8 | / 16 9 7 / | 5 3 2 | +3 +2 +1 | 62% 58% 67% | 173 160 191 | 34% 30% 39% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.90 0.60 1.31 | 199 131 291 | 14 5 9 | / 16 9 7 / | 2 0 2 | -2 -4 +2 | 71% 67% 78% | 130 76 203 | 25% 19% 29% | 2 1 1 | 3 2 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.78 0.62 1.00 | 126 85 183 | 12 4 8 | / 15 8 7 / | 1 1 0 | -3 -4 +1 | 67% 58% 78% | 78 72 86 | 30% 36% 25% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.72 0.94 0.43 | 134 176 78 | 9 7 2 | / 14 7 7 / | 9 4 5 | -5 0 -5 | 71% 75% 67% | 87 116 49 | 13% 10% 25% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.55 0.58 0.52 | 133 130 137 | 7 5 2 | / 15 8 7 / | 7 5 2 | -8 -3 -5 | 67% 75% 56% | 97 92 104 | 17% 12% 23% | 2 1 1 | 7 5 2 | -5 -4 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.46 1.23 1.62 | 301 277 319 | 21 8 13 | / 13 6 7 / | 6 3 3 | +8 +2 +6 | 71% 78% 67% | 205 191 215 | 23% 43% 13% | 7 2 5 | 5 3 2 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
1.27 0.91 1.54 | 206 201 211 | 14 6 8 | / 10 7 3 / | 13 4 9 | +4 -1 +5 | 81% 67% 92% | 133 117 144 | 22% 27% 21% | 3 2 1 | 1 1 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.17 1.31 1.07 | 182 220 153 | 15 8 7 | / 11 5 6 / | 3 2 1 | +4 +3 +1 | 71% 78% 67% | 124 154 102 | 26% 24% 29% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.13 1.36 0.96 | 223 256 199 | 16 9 7 | / 14 6 8 / | 7 2 5 | +2 +3 -1 | 76% 78% 75% | 150 156 145 | 18% 22% 15% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.71 0.54 0.83 | 119 90 140 | 9 3 6 | / 13 6 7 / | 2 1 1 | -4 -3 -1 | 67% 89% 50% | 80 55 99 | 20% 14% 24% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
100t hasn't won a match in 11 months lil bro.. do u watch any of the games xD not to mention G2 2-1 Sentinels meanwhile 100t has NEVER beat SEN. surely easy 2-0 G2 Esports
you know that sen lost that on purpose, because if they won the 1st map they go into playoffs
and then they won masters
wow i have to wait here for a 2 minute edit for NA to approve this MSG , thank god they are banning tikt0k
day #69420 of saying 100T looks better on paper and watching them get owned by every single team in the world.
100T 2-1 only because if they don’t win, a change needs to be made if they want any hope of making playoffs, let alone qualify for champs.
That kind of pressure should get them over the line. G2 look very good though. Wouldn’t be surprised if they take it
100T 2-1 we haven't seen the team in form against a team of equal or lesser strength, I wouldn't be suprised if they end up winning the rest of their games in groups
1-2 against LEV debut match as a roster
1-2 against SEN future Masters Madrid winners
0-2 against SEN off a championship performance (arguably better than Iceland)
Just unlucky matchups for a new roster COPE
4-1 to 4-8 is crazy xd how did they win against sen back in february, they look absolutely lost
who in G2 thought it would be a great idea to bring in icy that was playing in tier 2-3??? LOLOLOLOLOL
POOR NET
Why would you pickup a player who was always at the bottom of his team even in t2 qualifiers lmao
Poor performance by the IGL and the coach. Icy is new but not proven. nET was solid, he was the number 2,player in the Acension run which proves that he can play when it’s on the line. But he’s gone and these guys are gonna struggle.