Let's goo !
TH
KC
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.02 0.65 1.26 | 202 167 226 | 15 6 9 | / 14 6 8 / | 3 2 1 | +1 0 +1 | 65% 63% 67% | 129 122 133 | 41% 29% 50% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.78 0.83 0.74 | 178 166 187 | 12 6 6 | / 17 6 11 / | 4 2 2 | -5 0 -5 | 45% 50% 42% | 135 132 137 | 30% 42% 24% | 2 1 1 | 4 3 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.77 0.93 0.66 | 157 156 158 | 10 4 6 | / 14 5 9 / | 1 1 0 | -4 -1 -3 | 50% 63% 42% | 101 103 100 | 20% 20% 20% | 4 2 2 | 4 1 3 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.76 1.11 0.53 | 163 237 115 | 11 7 4 | / 15 7 8 / | 9 4 5 | -4 0 -4 | 60% 75% 50% | 115 144 96 | 44% 45% 43% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.61 0.77 0.50 | 132 202 86 | 8 5 3 | / 15 7 8 / | 6 5 1 | -7 -2 -5 | 60% 75% 50% | 85 128 57 | 24% 19% 33% | 0 0 0 | 3 0 3 | -3 0 -3 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.54 1.89 1.00 | 279 320 219 | 20 15 5 | / 13 6 7 / | 4 1 3 | +7 +9 -2 | 80% 83% 75% | 184 203 156 | 30% 26% 38% | 6 3 3 | 2 1 1 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
1.31 1.40 1.19 | 193 196 191 | 15 9 6 | / 10 5 5 / | 12 10 2 | +5 +4 +1 | 90% 83% 100% | 122 122 122 | 31% 47% 15% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.16 0.74 1.78 | 219 146 331 | 16 6 10 | / 12 8 4 / | 7 4 3 | +4 -2 +6 | 80% 75% 88% | 137 91 206 | 37% 30% 43% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.14 1.53 0.56 | 215 262 146 | 14 10 4 | / 10 4 6 / | 7 5 2 | +4 +6 -2 | 65% 83% 38% | 157 190 108 | 23% 24% 20% | 2 1 1 | 3 0 3 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.89 0.61 1.31 | 146 105 210 | 10 5 5 | / 11 6 5 / | 5 0 5 | -1 -1 0 | 75% 67% 88% | 104 76 145 | 42% 50% 38% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.65 1.26 1.02 | 202 167 226 | 15 6 9 | / 14 6 8 / | 3 2 1 | +1 0 +1 | 65% 63% 67% | 129 122 133 | 41% 29% 50% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.83 0.74 0.78 | 178 166 187 | 12 6 6 | / 17 6 11 / | 4 2 2 | -5 0 -5 | 45% 50% 42% | 135 132 137 | 30% 42% 24% | 2 1 1 | 4 3 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.93 0.66 0.77 | 157 156 158 | 10 4 6 | / 14 5 9 / | 1 1 0 | -4 -1 -3 | 50% 63% 42% | 101 103 100 | 20% 20% 20% | 4 2 2 | 4 1 3 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.11 0.53 0.76 | 163 237 115 | 11 7 4 | / 15 7 8 / | 9 4 5 | -4 0 -4 | 60% 75% 50% | 115 144 96 | 44% 45% 43% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.77 0.50 0.61 | 132 202 86 | 8 5 3 | / 15 7 8 / | 6 5 1 | -7 -2 -5 | 60% 75% 50% | 85 128 57 | 24% 19% 33% | 0 0 0 | 3 0 3 | -3 0 -3 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.89 1.00 1.54 | 279 320 219 | 20 15 5 | / 13 6 7 / | 4 1 3 | +7 +9 -2 | 80% 83% 75% | 184 203 156 | 30% 26% 38% | 6 3 3 | 2 1 1 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
1.40 1.19 1.31 | 193 196 191 | 15 9 6 | / 10 5 5 / | 12 10 2 | +5 +4 +1 | 90% 83% 100% | 122 122 122 | 31% 47% 15% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.74 1.78 1.16 | 219 146 331 | 16 6 10 | / 12 8 4 / | 7 4 3 | +4 -2 +6 | 80% 75% 88% | 137 91 206 | 37% 30% 43% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.53 0.56 1.14 | 215 262 146 | 14 10 4 | / 10 4 6 / | 7 5 2 | +4 +6 -2 | 65% 83% 38% | 157 190 108 | 23% 24% 20% | 2 1 1 | 3 0 3 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.61 1.31 0.89 | 146 105 210 | 10 5 5 | / 11 6 5 / | 5 0 5 | -1 -1 0 | 75% 67% 88% | 104 76 145 | 42% 50% 38% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 |
Theres nothing cope about it. If you think this isn't 50/50 then I don't know.
And how do you know KC wouldn't? Both them and Heretics are really similar teams. Bunch of young tier 2 talent bunched up with little experience, mixed in with 1 and half tier 1 players. Even though I like KC project bit more, the talent on paper isn't much different. And at least Heretics has played in off-season events.
lots of talent here but a lot of it is unproven
might be a game we'll look back on in the future to be like "wait, so this guy played with this guy against this guy???"
I mean not nevesarrily this specific game, maybe the league match between these two tho
both looking worse than na tier 2 teams but at least kc looks promising cuz theyre actually adapting new comps like the yoru istead of being stuck in the emea past like sage comp
A very outdated comp from Heretics..
Sage feels like an agent stuck in the past.
KC looking a lot better than I thought at this point of the season.
Both teams packed with high potential and mechanical players however KC looks a lot closer to the finished product that TH does.
Real spheal
Do you think the sage could have been a troll pick because it's a goofy silly bo1s?
Yeah that is definitely possible.
On the positive side.. patitek should be a good standin for wo0t for the kick-off event.
Regardless I still don't think TH is a competitor for those madrid spots.
A lot of improvement is needed but there is still time for this young squad.
when you say "KC looks a lot closer to the finished product that TH does." do you mean kc won't be able to improve anymore?
No.
The new KC roster has a really high ceiling (potential).
There is always ways to improve ... always new ways to innovate and develop.
However the amount you can improve decreases as you improve. The gains become marginal but still important in tier 1.
KC looks a lot closer to the finished product that TH does.
By a "finished product" I mean a coherent team that works well together.
A team that knows what they are doing and what their team mates are doing.
It seems to me that the problem with heretics is that their defense in bind is predictable, they do the same almost every round having 3 in B throwing the smoke in long and the flash without being able to take control of the space while the two in A do not made proactive plays and Wo0t and Boo or Benjy at the end of the round could not retake on B since it was always 2 v 5 or 2 v 4
The sage is outdated in this map the big problem its Neilzinho