so I saw a post a few days ago of some1 comparing NA and EMEA this year and said that EMEA is a 1 team region. because no EMEA team (outside of FNC) had won over a NA team which is true.
lock//in NA 4-2 EMEA (FNC won both for EMEA)
masters tokyo NA 4-2 EMEA (FNC won both for EMEA)
but i have a counter arguement for why EMEA is a better region this year. NA has 5 teams and EMEA has 10 teams. EMEA has double the amount of teams compared to NA. EMEA has 50 players from the EMEA region (not counting sixth man only the 5 main players). while NA has 22 players from the NA region. ardiis is from EMEA and then both pancada and sacy is from SA. ( im not counting jawgemo since he played in NA before franchising) so EMEA has more then double the players from their own region. imo EMEA would be a better region if we took the 25 best players and made it into 5 diffrent teams. i know this isnt something that i can prove but u cant really prove otherwise either so i guess its kinda pointless after all. my main point i guess is that imo EMEA has better players. if i made a top 25 player list with only EMEA and NA players then i would have more EMEA players then NA players. but what do u guys think is NA or EMEA better or are the equal. i would love to see what other people think.
Edit: FNC solos NA