2 wins in Masters kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
its ez na has a population of 300 million and emea has a population of 2.5 billion. emea should have at least 8 times the amount of trophies na has, so for the 2 trophies na has you should have 16 and in reality you have 4.
na started tokyo with 2 teams and they are still here, emea started with 4 teams and you have 1 left.
LOCK/IN you should have lost and you know that as it was 11-3 for LOUD on the last map. If they didn't choke we would have 3 trophies whilst you would have 2. You had 4 teams in this event and half of them didn't make it past groups and all of them except FNC lost to NA. You can only justify your region being "better" due to higher count of trophies because you are a delusional coper whose region is simply behind Americas' right now and by far
If we're talking about IFS and buts then sen just abused the early shift to valorant and Iceland 2 had prime gambit visa had Ukraine Russia issue and had to disband and couldn't play weekly matches and ended up playing later without a week break like rest of the teams, fpx was in their honeymoon period couldn't show up because of visa issues and fnatic's 2 players couldn't show up. And when liquid had qualified even though they were in their worst form with scream igling, they still had to show up. That's the second trophy Na has won. I agree with the narrative that optic is a w org w team and that's why they've finished top 4 almost every event But this narrative takes away all trophies of NA.
Not really. SEN Reykjavik went undefeated without dropping a single map, to anybody. FNC did come close to taking maps though in GF. If we're speaking about ifs then if franchising was implemented earlier in Valorant then LOUD would've been an Americas team therefore bolstering our region. LOUD went 1st place with two 2nd places in the last 3 international events out of 4. OpTic in similar fashion went Top 3 in every single international event and won 1 of them, only really losing to LOUD, hence the now existing rivalry. Do you really believe that IF EMEA did not have any of those issues, that any of those teams you mentioned would have had that dominant of performances like LOUD and OpTic/NRG? I can agree that Gambit could have started an era but that's about it. FNC is your longest standing team that has been the most consistent and yet they couldn't produce as strong results as both LOUD and NRG, but maybe now they can. I don't think the narrative changes, issues aside
bro
FPX(NAVI) do bad for one tournament and they are irrelevant now???
thas like saying LOUD is irrelevant too
GMB, OPTC, FPX, LOUD, FNC cores are still all relevant
the dude above said that acend is irrelevant
I said SEN is also
so if we take their lans wins out:
champs EMEA: 0
champs NA: 0
masters EMEA: 2
masters NA: 1
showoff Tourney EMEA: 1
showoff Tourney NA: 0