FPX- Gambit
Gambit 2-1 FPX
GMB
G2
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2.04 2.12 2.01 | 419 352 442 | 22 5 17 | / 7 1 6 / | 10 5 5 | +15 +4 +11 | 81% 100% 75% | 236 116 276 | 15% 22% 14% | 4 1 3 | 0 0 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.33 2.20 1.04 | 262 405 215 | 17 7 10 | / 9 2 7 / | 6 1 5 | +8 +5 +3 | 88% 100% 83% | 147 143 148 | 40% 45% 39% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.26 1.02 1.35 | 192 188 194 | 13 3 10 | / 6 2 4 / | 2 2 0 | +7 +1 +6 | 81% 100% 75% | 110 79 120 | 25% 10% 33% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.18 1.53 1.07 | 196 210 192 | 12 3 9 | / 8 2 6 / | 7 5 2 | +4 +1 +3 | 69% 75% 67% | 107 130 99 | 29% 29% 29% | 3 0 3 | 1 0 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.73 0.02 1.00 | 140 95 156 | 8 1 7 | / 10 4 6 / | 3 1 2 | -2 -3 +1 | 63% 50% 67% | 92 48 107 | 33% 14% 45% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.78 0.82 0.66 | 163 160 173 | 10 7 3 | / 14 10 4 / | 0 0 0 | -4 -3 -1 | 56% 42% 100% | 86 96 55 | 26% 33% 0% | 2 2 0 | 4 4 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.70 0.79 0.42 | 174 178 165 | 9 7 2 | / 14 10 4 / | 5 3 2 | -5 -3 -2 | 63% 58% 75% | 101 114 61 | 17% 15% 25% | 2 1 1 | 2 2 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.69 0.57 1.06 | 140 142 134 | 8 6 2 | / 14 11 3 / | 8 3 5 | -6 -5 -1 | 69% 58% 100% | 76 80 66 | 19% 29% 0% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.64 0.52 1.02 | 155 116 274 | 6 3 3 | / 15 11 4 / | 7 6 1 | -9 -8 -1 | 56% 58% 50% | 132 110 200 | 16% 8% 36% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.57 0.79 0.02 | 147 168 87 | 7 6 1 | / 15 11 4 / | 5 4 1 | -8 -5 -3 | 50% 50% 50% | 92 121 2 | 18% 18% 0% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.01 1.41 1.25 | 277 202 299 | 52 16 36 | / 38 18 20 / | 23 10 13 | +14 -2 +16 | 73% 68% 76% | 160 96 202 | 16% 14% 16% | 5 2 3 | 4 2 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.10 1.26 1.20 | 235 220 253 | 56 21 35 | / 43 21 22 / | 22 7 15 | +13 0 +13 | 77% 72% 81% | 149 114 173 | 40% 46% 38% | 9 4 5 | 4 2 2 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
0.91 1.33 1.16 | 212 203 231 | 47 17 30 | / 42 22 20 / | 22 7 15 | +5 -5 +10 | 77% 72% 81% | 137 126 145 | 28% 28% 28% | 6 1 5 | 4 2 2 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
0.56 1.31 1.00 | 183 125 214 | 43 10 33 | / 38 19 19 / | 15 6 9 | +5 -9 +14 | 73% 56% 84% | 104 46 143 | 29% 14% 34% | 4 0 4 | 3 2 1 | +1 -2 +3 | |
|
0.61 0.97 0.82 | 165 159 176 | 35 12 23 | / 44 22 22 / | 10 3 7 | -9 -10 +1 | 66% 56% 73% | 104 98 108 | 23% 23% 23% | 15 6 9 | 8 4 4 | +7 +2 +5 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.60 1.53 0.97 | 234 174 334 | 49 19 30 | / 50 34 16 / | 15 8 7 | -1 -15 +14 | 65% 54% 80% | 158 126 205 | 18% 17% 19% | 7 3 4 | 8 5 3 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
1.13 0.73 0.96 | 179 211 135 | 39 28 11 | / 43 27 16 / | 17 12 5 | -4 +1 -5 | 69% 65% 76% | 116 138 83 | 28% 35% 17% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.54 1.37 0.87 | 202 164 259 | 45 20 25 | / 48 36 12 / | 14 7 7 | -3 -16 +13 | 65% 57% 76% | 131 113 159 | 27% 18% 39% | 5 1 4 | 8 5 3 | -3 -4 +1 | |
|
0.66 1.04 0.81 | 148 113 207 | 35 16 19 | / 42 29 13 / | 16 9 7 | -7 -13 +6 | 73% 59% 92% | 86 70 110 | 22% 23% 21% | 5 2 3 | 10 6 4 | -5 -4 -1 | |
|
0.80 0.75 0.78 | 173 188 162 | 37 22 15 | / 50 32 18 / | 11 6 5 | -13 -10 -3 | 65% 57% 76% | 114 128 94 | 28% 28% 27% | 5 4 1 | 11 10 1 | -6 -6 0 |
GMB
G2
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.11 0.65 1.41 | 217 126 279 | 16 3 13 | / 15 6 9 / | 5 1 4 | +1 -3 +4 | 70% 38% 92% | 123 17 195 | 32% 33% 31% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.94 0.24 1.41 | 219 135 275 | 13 2 11 | / 15 8 7 / | 7 2 5 | -2 -6 +4 | 70% 38% 92% | 153 82 200 | 18% 17% 19% | 1 1 0 | 4 2 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.89 0.42 1.20 | 168 104 212 | 11 3 8 | / 16 7 9 / | 8 0 8 | -5 -4 -1 | 75% 63% 83% | 105 59 136 | 24% 38% 19% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.81 0.85 0.79 | 150 164 142 | 12 5 7 | / 15 8 7 / | 5 3 2 | -3 -3 0 | 65% 63% 67% | 92 98 87 | 37% 36% 38% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.68 0.49 0.81 | 165 134 186 | 11 3 8 | / 17 7 10 / | 3 1 2 | -6 -4 -2 | 55% 50% 58% | 90 77 99 | 13% 25% 7% | 4 1 3 | 3 1 2 | +1 0 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.40 0.71 2.42 | 325 236 460 | 23 9 14 | / 13 11 2 / | 3 2 1 | +10 -2 +12 | 75% 58% 100% | 202 149 282 | 18% 16% 20% | 4 3 1 | 1 1 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.29 1.63 0.77 | 219 290 113 | 17 15 2 | / 10 6 4 / | 6 5 1 | +7 +9 -2 | 95% 100% 88% | 131 169 74 | 42% 48% 30% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.01 0.58 1.65 | 256 197 345 | 17 8 9 | / 15 11 4 / | 6 3 3 | +2 -3 +5 | 75% 75% 75% | 170 141 214 | 23% 14% 33% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.01 0.71 1.47 | 134 107 177 | 11 5 6 | / 10 9 1 / | 6 6 0 | +1 -4 +5 | 75% 67% 88% | 73 72 75 | 19% 13% 31% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.61 0.73 0.42 | 152 190 95 | 10 7 3 | / 15 10 5 / | 4 4 0 | -5 -3 -2 | 70% 83% 50% | 109 138 67 | 27% 23% 50% | 3 2 1 | 5 4 1 | -2 -2 0 |
GMB
G2
GMB
G2
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.41 0.91 1.91 | 293 197 391 | 27 9 18 | / 19 11 8 / | 11 3 8 | +8 -2 +10 | 81% 69% 92% | 195 116 275 | 41% 53% 37% | 5 2 3 | 2 2 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
1.36 1.02 1.69 | 272 261 285 | 24 11 13 | / 18 13 5 / | 7 2 5 | +6 -2 +8 | 85% 77% 92% | 181 166 196 | 30% 26% 34% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.01 1.14 0.87 | 192 197 188 | 17 9 8 | / 16 9 7 / | 6 3 3 | +1 0 +1 | 69% 77% 62% | 118 99 136 | 13% 11% 15% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.98 0.86 1.10 | 189 195 184 | 16 8 8 | / 17 11 6 / | 4 1 3 | -1 -3 +2 | 77% 62% 92% | 121 126 117 | 24% 24% 24% | 9 5 4 | 2 1 1 | +7 +4 +3 | |
|
0.76 0.36 1.17 | 139 105 174 | 14 4 10 | / 17 11 6 / | 8 3 5 | -3 -7 +4 | 69% 54% 85% | 85 54 116 | 29% 13% 39% | 3 0 3 | 1 1 0 | +2 -1 +3 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.96 0.99 0.92 | 170 178 163 | 15 7 8 | / 18 10 8 / | 6 3 3 | -3 -3 0 | 62% 46% 77% | 120 125 114 | 26% 53% 13% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.91 0.83 0.98 | 205 211 199 | 17 8 9 | / 21 12 9 / | 7 2 5 | -4 -4 0 | 65% 46% 85% | 135 148 122 | 29% 30% 28% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.88 0.27 1.48 | 177 121 235 | 19 5 14 | / 19 15 4 / | 3 1 2 | 0 -10 +10 | 58% 38% 77% | 120 85 155 | 39% 28% 46% | 1 0 1 | 4 2 2 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.86 0.57 1.14 | 222 169 275 | 20 7 13 | / 22 12 10 / | 5 0 5 | -2 -5 +3 | 62% 46% 77% | 139 118 160 | 20% 27% 14% | 2 0 2 | 5 3 2 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.74 0.70 0.78 | 170 92 248 | 16 5 11 | / 18 9 9 / | 2 0 2 | -2 -4 +2 | 73% 54% 92% | 103 60 145 | 25% 33% 23% | 3 1 2 | 8 4 4 | -5 -3 -2 |
This is where we will find out if the people saying that Liquid should have been the other team going to Berlin instead of G2 are right or not. Hope not, but it could happen…
I would say 2-1 Gambit wins, G2 is good an all but Gambit kind of scary at the moment
I hope G2 try this match and make it competitive I don't want to see another SMB type beat
I don't think they have a lot of time to prepare to create specific counter plays against Gambit, think G2 will have to resort to comfort picks.
At least against Giants it looks like they had aspects of their strategy that were specifically countering DavidP.
so hard win for G2.they need to fire on.
map 1 G2 will lose.G2 G3 .ez win for G2
I think liquid deserved to be in berlin more than G2. G2 got a little lucky, they only won 2 matches and against teams OXG and Giants. I still think Gambit Liquid SMB and ascent would have been the best lineup.
The lucky is deserved when G2 was #2 EU and TL was #5 EU before the EMEA playoffs...
Why so mad man ? Liquid wasn't the 2nd seed so how are they supposed to get easier bracket.
After yesterday's matches I would say g2 2-1 Gambit imo, deffo keeps underperforming for some reason, would be glad to be proven wrong.
Lmao feels really depressing when G2 are shutdown like that. Was really hoping for a close match but G2 just gets shutdown against Turkish team.
Bc that Turkish team was well and clearly better than them. Just because they're a Turkish team, doesn't mean they can't be better than a T1 EU team
Trust me G2 will win because of koldamenta went bald ,let's go bald buff
Edit : look like bald buff not work
TL has never been the favourite, maybe on masters 2 but this challengers they played on their worst version, but they qualyfied bc fnatic played worst
Can't predict who will win but I am here for Gambit, if nAts goes nuts, well, okay
i have gambit and smb +1.5 on my 8in1 parlay. i hope both of them win their games. lets go gambit !!
Exited about the game; Gambit is a very strog team with very good players, but i think G2 will take this because they come with a lot of confidence on theirselves after yesterday comeback. If I had to bet I would say g2 take this💪🔥
#G2ARMY
Who lose this will be faced vs Sentinels in the same group of Berlin: 1st EMEA alone, 2nd EMEA 3rd NA, 3rd EMEA 2nd NA, 4rd EMEA 1st NA
Nah, two EMEA groups may be put into the same bracket.
https://twitter.com/FionnOnFire/status/1428802281474981890?s=20
The draw favored them. They just needed to beat Oxygen and Giants to secure a spot. Obviously this is also because they did well to qualify in the first try so fair play to them in that respect.
B1SK is a way to go if they chose so. Dude dropped double 30 bombs against gambit. Both on raze and jett. When he played with stack of players 3 out 4 of which is now NaVi.
Edit: but honestly they might want to stick with deffo. He has great potential just need to fix his mentality problems