it's unfair comparing nats to Less? it's not fair. i think Less proved himself already and nats still hasn't done much for a while.
currently, Less >> nats
you can't judge a player based on his team not showing up in 1 game, considering he got mvp still even with how his team played...
He as a sentinel gets the most frequent MVP's, Less doesn't do that, if you watch how nats plays he's a completely different monster, I'm not saying Less is bad, it's just the way nats plays is something that you don't see in any other player till now, it's like saying aspas, derke > yay now, u just can't win it all, yay is consistently putting up good numbers but sometimes it's just not enough, same as nats in a sentinel role
nats just hasnt showcased it, more like liquid hasnt showcased it. but that literally doesnt mean nats is a worse or better player. you can have whatever opinion, but nats is singlehandedly the smartest player at this game, he is miles above the #2 player in gamesense, i am not talking about his setups or his lurks. its the way he takes 1v1s , its the way he predicts enemies position, its the way he uses his util.
tldr: sure you can have less as #1 sentinel for now, but nats will eventually come and show and you all will regret that we ever compared mortals like less and suygetsu to nats.