Ange1 > Boaster
Shao > Leo
Suygetsu > Alfajer
Zyppan < Chronicle
cNed < Derke
???
it's called a prediction brooooooo!
what is the fucking point of rating players only after their accomplishments?
I think it is much more interesting to watch the games, notice the talent of a player, and make rankings based off that
leo is on the cusp of winning a masters is it really so bold to put him up there with shao if you think fnatic will win this masters?
This.
This is why navi is scary. 3 of them are individually better than fnc’s players (derke > cned unless we’re talking about op skills and chronicle better individually than zyppan unless zyp has a guardian).
If fnc beat them its because theyre strategically superior (which, to be fair is the hardest part of this game)
I know it's not. FPX and NAVI both got where they got last year because their strats and IGL-ing was good. But last year, Mistic and Enzo were SIGNIFICANTLY worse individually than anyone on FPX and yet FNC still beat them so many times (except the one time it mattered most...) and it was specifically because their strats were just that much better.
Here now, both NAVI and FPX got here because their stratting has been insane but also players have been individually insane. So even though, the players on NAVI are slightly better individually it is not that big of a difference. so stratting will be once again what really differentiates.
What you said, although true overall, you can't tell me that Shao swung the game on Ascent vs LEV (that was most definitely a swing round) it was because NAVI were just better strategically, it was simply because Shao outplayed them individually. You can most definitely win games through superior gameplay at key moments.
Remember Mwzera's insane individual prowess vs FURIA where they won a round they shoulda never won, simply because Mwzera 1v4'd the entire FNC. That wasnt because FURIA was strategically better, it was because Mwzera did something individually insane.
I hope you understand what i mean. And sorry for the book i just wrote.
Ange1>>Boaster
Shao > Leo (this is close because Leo is probably the best pure initiator in the world, Shao plays Astra and Omen alot)
Zyppan = Chronicle
Suygetsu>> Alfajer
Cned <<< Derke (this was close too, both top 3 duelists atm but Derke been slightly better this tournament)
I think NaVi has the better individual players just barely
Why do people rate derke so highly tho?
He's usually insane, but I'm pretty sure he goes double negative everytime they face elimination against a big team, it happened against SEN, Kru, PRX, FPX, DRX...
The opposite could be said for cNed, when acend were good, he would step up everytime they're in danger and pull out massive performances against the biggest teams in the world.
For this game I'd say cNed >>> Derke
For a regular season Derke would destroy the other teams.
it's true dude.
Don't be blind. Go watch acs, player rating and Damage per round.
Alfa has a much higher output.
An plays any freaking agent in the game almost.
He's freaking cracked at Jett and Raze. Suygetsu not so much.
Suygetsu is fantastic player, but alfajer is better in my opinion and data proves it.
this tournament ? Or overall
Cause alfajer played raze and neon for fnatic, my guy you cannot compare those stats lmao
Also suygetsu dragged navi over the finish line to win a masters after Shao solo dragged them to semi's. Don't disrespect suygetsu's achievements.
He hasn't even been playing to his level this tournament yet.