wtf is wrong with them are they nepo or why are a lot of talents on tier 2 shitting on them rn
cloudberry [#3]It's not nepotism if an organization is committed to a project, regardless of whether it's theoretically better to drop everything and shift gears
i actually understand the long term projects but i dont understand the "long term players" thing they have, specially because sometimes they kick players who werent the issue or that had more potential and keep familiar faces over them ngl.
cloudberry [#3]It's not nepotism if an organization is committed to a project, regardless of whether it's theoretically better to drop everything and shift gears
nah its def nepotism, brazil/latam recycles the same washed players giving them time on each and every team before they decide to go for someone new, just cause they were on a team before in t1
koromast [#4]i actually understand the long term projects but i dont understand the "long term players" thing they have, specially because sometimes they kick players who werent the issue or that had more potential and keep familiar faces over them ngl.
Tbf 100 Thieves did originally intend to keep the entire roster for next season
ParodyAccount [#2]people don't realise there isn't that big of a gap between T1 and T2 skill wise. This isn't the case for all regions but very prevalent in NA
disgree, it's only close during the offseason. Look at sym at challengers > at sen inv -> right now. Only sucked during sen inv
cloudberry [#6]Tbf 100 Thieves did originally intend to keep the entire roster for next season
yeah bang for zander aint bad but i never understood if bang wanted to leave or they wanted to get zander over him, if 100t wanted zander i understand but bang was never bad enough to remove him imo.
koromast [#8]yeah bang for zander aint bad but i never understood if bang wanted to leave or they wanted to get zander over him, if 100t wanted zander i understand but bang was never bad enough to remove him imo.
sen gave him an offer and he preferred it over staying afaik
Tadpole3 [#9]wdym rn, 100lost to oxg at the end of 2023, so did g2, fnc lost to a japan team last year/2 years ago
i know level wise tier 2 teams arent far from tier 1 but orgless premier teams winning to top 5 of their vct rosters its new to me and a bit embarrasing to say the least
uwukitten [#10]sen gave him an offer and he preferred it over staying afaik
if thats the case then i think 100t did what they could, im still curious about wtf its wrong with the roster, it should be top tier on paper
ParodyAccount [#2]people don't realise there isn't that big of a gap between T1 and T2 skill wise. This isn't the case for all regions but very prevalent in NA
In this case what is considered "Skill"
Mechanics?
Game Knowledge?
Adaption?
Cant just generally say "Skill"
koromast [#12]if thats the case then i think 100t did what they could, im still curious about wtf its wrong with the roster, it should be top tier on paper
It's one off season match. And regardless, everyone in Americas upgraded big time while 100T only sidegraded realistically. They can still perform well but they're going against some insane competition.
Ballsamolee [#13]trust in plug has just been scrimming for a lot longer than 100T. 100T started scrimming not too long ago.
wrong PLUG was only scrimminh 4 days
bobwoblob [#15]It's one off season match. And regardless, everyone in Americas upgraded big time while 100T only sidegraded realistically. They can still perform well but they're going against some insane competition.
sidegrading from 5th on vct americas shouldnt look this bad honestly thats what bothers me