jdg pls
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
274 | 21 | / 10 / | 7 | +11 | 163 | 29% | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||
|
261 | 21 | / 12 / | 1 | +9 | 156 | 25% | 2 | 3 | -1 | |||
|
208 | 15 | / 15 / | 10 | 0 | 142 | 39% | 3 | 3 | 0 | |||
|
184 | 13 | / 11 / | 12 | +2 | 133 | 14% | 0 | 5 | -5 | |||
|
148 | 11 | / 13 / | 7 | -2 | 103 | 26% | 1 | 2 | -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
225 | 15 | / 15 / | 8 | 0 | 146 | 28% | 2 | 2 | 0 | |||
|
195 | 13 | / 15 / | 8 | -2 | 136 | 39% | 2 | 0 | +2 | |||
|
185 | 13 | / 17 / | 2 | -4 | 116 | 24% | 6 | 3 | +3 | |||
|
146 | 10 | / 17 / | 5 | -7 | 107 | 23% | 2 | 2 | 0 | |||
|
140 | 10 | / 17 / | 5 | -7 | 86 | 41% | 2 | 0 | +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
309 | 41 | / 17 / | 14 | +24 | 190 | 34% | 6 | 1 | +5 | |||
|
235 | 33 | / 18 / | 3 | +15 | 143 | 18% | 6 | 3 | +3 | |||
|
219 | 27 | / 25 / | 25 | +2 | 149 | 34% | 3 | 5 | -2 | |||
|
195 | 26 | / 21 / | 18 | +5 | 130 | 20% | 1 | 6 | -5 | |||
|
191 | 26 | / 20 / | 13 | +6 | 129 | 24% | 3 | 3 | 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
211 | 25 | / 30 / | 14 | -5 | 137 | 31% | 2 | 4 | -2 | |||
|
182 | 22 | / 32 / | 4 | -10 | 126 | 28% | 9 | 9 | 0 | |||
|
155 | 20 | / 30 / | 9 | -10 | 100 | 23% | 2 | 3 | -1 | |||
|
143 | 17 | / 30 / | 9 | -13 | 106 | 28% | 2 | 2 | 0 | |||
|
140 | 17 | / 31 / | 6 | -14 | 91 | 37% | 3 | 1 | +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
343 | 20 | / 7 / | 7 | +13 | 225 | 38% | 5 | 0 | +5 | |||
|
234 | 15 | / 7 / | 6 | +8 | 162 | 22% | 2 | 1 | +1 | |||
|
229 | 12 | / 10 / | 15 | +2 | 159 | 28% | 0 | 2 | -2 | |||
|
209 | 12 | / 6 / | 2 | +6 | 127 | 10% | 4 | 0 | +4 | |||
|
206 | 13 | / 10 / | 6 | +3 | 126 | 25% | 1 | 1 | 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
196 | 10 | / 15 / | 6 | -5 | 126 | 34% | 0 | 2 | -2 | |||
|
179 | 9 | / 15 / | 2 | -6 | 140 | 31% | 3 | 6 | -3 | |||
|
164 | 10 | / 13 / | 4 | -3 | 91 | 23% | 0 | 1 | -1 | |||
|
139 | 7 | / 14 / | 1 | -7 | 98 | 33% | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||
|
91 | 4 | / 15 / | 1 | -11 | 66 | 17% | 0 | 2 | -2 |
Does TEC deserve to make champs despite playing like the worst team in cn because they beat FPX? (who everyone considers the #1 team in cn). If we're judging who has been playing the best valorant in cn this split it's the 4 I said. EDG looked better against NOVA and BLG but I struggle to say they're deserving of the champs slot unless they look great in playoffs.