Has there been any player that has gotten a 0.00 rating? Is it even possible?
Edit: Whats the lowest rating you have ever seen?
0
0.00 rating
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
ayayaay [#3]legendary jessievash and jemkin 0.09
jessievash's age was higher than his acs and rating combined
ayayaay [#3]legendary jessievash and jemkin 0.09
also https://www.vlr.gg/183949/natus-vincere-vs-team-heretics-champions-tour-2023-emea-league-w3/?game=119204&tab=overview is prob the worst rating in t1
smthlikeyou11 [#6]also https://www.vlr.gg/183949/natus-vincere-vs-team-heretics-champions-tour-2023-emea-league-w3/?game=119204&tab=overview is prob the worst rating in t1
wtf
smthlikeyou11 [#6]also https://www.vlr.gg/183949/natus-vincere-vs-team-heretics-champions-tour-2023-emea-league-w3/?game=119204&tab=overview is prob the worst rating in t1
damn 0.03
smthlikeyou11 [#6]also https://www.vlr.gg/183949/natus-vincere-vs-team-heretics-champions-tour-2023-emea-league-w3/?game=119204&tab=overview is prob the worst rating in t1
wait thats impressive
smthlikeyou11 [#6]also https://www.vlr.gg/183949/natus-vincere-vs-team-heretics-champions-tour-2023-emea-league-w3/?game=119204&tab=overview is prob the worst rating in t1
Wtf lmaoo
FerahgoTheGreat [#14]The rating is built to asymptote at 0.0. Significantly less than 1% of ratings get below 0.1, and the system is built to keep them from going negative.
that makes sense but do u know the exact formula that the rating is calculated by? i cant seem to figure it out
also it would be fun to set 0.00 as the middleground as in the perfect positive/negative impact to see how negative ratings can get
B1itz [#2]it would be pretty much impossible because having pretty much any KAST score would give you a point
Thats not mathematically how that works. The rating is a linear combination of several individual statistical components (KAST is not used in the calculation). The distribution of each component can be approximated as a gaussian, and the overall rating also looks like a gaussian. A mathematical bell curve has a tail that goes to negative infinity, and because the rating is arbitrarily scaled to have a mean of 1.0 and a custom standard deviation, there is no mathematical reason the pure rating couldn't go negative. In practice, almost no ratings get below 0.1, and the algorithm is built to force an asymptote at 0.0, so negative ratings are not possible.
smthlikeyou11 [#15]that makes sense but do u know the exact formula that the rating is calculated by? i cant seem to figure it out
also it would be fun to set 0.00 as the middleground as in the perfect positive/negative impact to see how negative ratings can get
I do know the exact formula since I made the rating, but I can't distribute it. This article explains the general principles behind it.
FerahgoTheGreat [#14]The rating is built to asymptote at 0.0. Significantly less than 1% of ratings get below 0.1, and the system is built to keep them from going negative.
Due to rounding cutoffs, I think it would be possible for the rating to show as 0.00 on the website if the true value is <0.005, but I have never seen one that low.
FerahgoTheGreat [#17]I do know the exact formula since I made the rating, but I can't distribute it. This article explains the general principles behind it.
ty
B1itz [#2]it would be pretty much impossible because having pretty much any KAST score would give you a point
yeah Blitz you got fucking owned by FerahgoTheGoat
FerahgoTheGreat [#16]Thats not mathematically how that works. The rating is a linear combination of several individual statistical components (KAST is not used in the calculation). The distribution of each component can be approximated as a gaussian, and the overall rating also looks like a gaussian. A mathematical bell curve has a tail that goes to negative infinity, and because the rating is arbitrarily scaled to have a mean of 1.0 and a custom standard deviation, there is no mathematical reason the pure rating couldn't go negative. In practice, almost no ratings get below 0.1, and the algorithm is built to force an asymptote at 0.0, so negative ratings are not possible.
How's your nuclear engineering going Ferahgo?
B1itz [#2]it would be pretty much impossible because having pretty much any KAST score would give you a point
stupid fucking blitz forgot about the gaussian
CraigGarth01 [#21]How's your nuclear engineering going Ferahgo?
Pretty good. I got my Masters, and I am starting on a PhD.
Subreezy [#20]yeah Blitz you got fucking owned by FerahgoTheGoat
I confused RIB.gg rating with VLR.gg rating its over for me
smthlikeyou11 [#6]also https://www.vlr.gg/183949/natus-vincere-vs-team-heretics-champions-tour-2023-emea-league-w3/?game=119204&tab=overview is prob the worst rating in t1
This reminds me of a map TH had against EG I think it was. Keloqz went nuclear first half on defense and barely got a kill on attack iirc
FerahgoTheGreat [#23]Pretty good. I got my Masters, and I am starting on a PhD.
Oh damn, that's great
What topic will you be conducting your research on if I may ask?
B1itz [#24]I confused RIB.gg rating with VLR.gg rating its over for me
owned + ratio theres no coming back
FerahgoTheGreat [#14]The rating is built to asymptote at 0.0. Significantly less than 1% of ratings get below 0.1, and the system is built to keep them from going negative.
https://vlr.gg/312926/funcrew-vs-disorder-challengers-league-oceania-stage-1-uro16/?game=all&tab=overview
how tf did I get 0.05 for the first map??
Like my stats were not that bad compared to the rest of my team and their respective ratings.
Zerphyr1 [#28]https://vlr.gg/312926/funcrew-vs-disorder-challengers-league-oceania-stage-1-uro16/?game=all&tab=overview
how tf did I get 0.05 for the first map??Like my stats were not that bad compared to the rest of my team and their respective ratings.
Nah bro got obliterated
Discord