TL are going to shit on them
TL 2 - 0
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.49 1.16 1.80 | 224 191 256 | 21 8 13 | / 12 7 5 / | 5 2 3 | +9 +1 +8 | 87% 73% 100% | 150 115 183 | 33% 32% 34% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.16 0.51 1.76 | 202 83 313 | 16 3 13 | / 14 8 6 / | 12 5 7 | +2 -5 +7 | 83% 64% 100% | 150 53 240 | 32% 17% 37% | 3 0 3 | 2 2 0 | +1 -2 +3 | |
|
1.16 0.81 1.49 | 229 151 301 | 19 6 13 | / 18 9 9 / | 9 3 6 | +1 -3 +4 | 83% 73% 92% | 153 111 192 | 41% 25% 52% | 4 2 2 | 1 1 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.14 1.21 1.08 | 215 239 193 | 17 10 7 | / 15 8 7 / | 6 2 4 | +2 +2 0 | 74% 73% 75% | 152 167 138 | 30% 45% 17% | 2 1 1 | 4 1 3 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.89 1.13 0.67 | 172 229 121 | 12 8 4 | / 14 8 6 / | 7 2 5 | -2 0 -2 | 78% 73% 83% | 107 134 81 | 12% 10% 13% | 4 3 1 | 1 0 1 | +3 +3 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.42 1.29 1.56 | 269 229 314 | 22 10 12 | / 14 8 6 / | 1 0 1 | +8 +2 +6 | 78% 75% 82% | 189 168 212 | 42% 43% 41% | 4 3 1 | 1 1 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.02 0.55 1.54 | 190 94 294 | 15 4 11 | / 17 10 7 / | 13 6 7 | -2 -6 +4 | 78% 67% 91% | 133 60 213 | 33% 25% 36% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.98 0.65 1.35 | 218 208 231 | 18 8 10 | / 16 11 5 / | 3 2 1 | +2 -3 +5 | 70% 75% 64% | 153 144 164 | 32% 42% 25% | 2 1 1 | 5 5 0 | -3 -4 +1 | |
|
0.80 1.02 0.56 | 140 185 92 | 11 8 3 | / 17 9 8 / | 15 7 8 | -6 -1 -5 | 78% 75% 82% | 94 129 55 | 36% 37% 33% | 0 0 0 | 3 0 3 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
0.18 0.04 0.33 | 104 105 104 | 7 3 4 | / 21 12 9 / | 4 1 3 | -14 -9 -5 | 57% 33% 82% | 72 80 63 | 23% 24% 23% | 1 0 1 | 5 2 3 | -4 -2 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.24 1.07 1.15 | 213 246 199 | 52 27 25 | / 43 19 24 / | 13 5 8 | +9 +8 +1 | 72% 76% 69% | 145 146 144 | 30% 32% 29% | 5 4 1 | 3 1 2 | +2 +3 -1 | |
|
1.16 0.96 1.05 | 212 217 216 | 49 24 25 | / 46 18 28 / | 13 5 8 | +3 +6 -3 | 69% 69% 69% | 145 150 142 | 29% 36% 23% | 9 3 6 | 10 5 5 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.93 0.90 0.92 | 204 175 213 | 41 19 22 | / 45 18 27 / | 15 4 11 | -4 +1 -5 | 71% 76% 67% | 127 105 144 | 17% 8% 21% | 10 4 6 | 6 3 3 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
0.69 1.03 0.87 | 182 127 225 | 41 13 28 | / 51 21 30 / | 20 7 13 | -10 -8 -2 | 75% 76% 75% | 123 86 152 | 34% 23% 40% | 5 3 2 | 4 2 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.89 0.83 0.86 | 180 185 186 | 40 18 22 | / 49 20 29 / | 30 13 17 | -9 -2 -7 | 75% 72% 78% | 126 121 130 | 29% 29% 30% | 6 1 5 | 7 3 4 | -1 -2 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.37 1.08 1.24 | 226 229 227 | 54 32 22 | / 43 22 21 / | 25 13 12 | +11 +10 +1 | 78% 81% 76% | 149 149 149 | 31% 28% 35% | 4 1 3 | 6 2 4 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
1.20 1.29 1.24 | 218 212 234 | 49 28 21 | / 38 21 17 / | 12 5 7 | +11 +7 +4 | 72% 72% 72% | 155 154 157 | 36% 43% 31% | 5 3 2 | 3 2 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.92 1.23 1.06 | 226 218 224 | 49 26 23 | / 48 29 19 / | 22 12 10 | +1 -3 +4 | 77% 83% 69% | 149 145 154 | 32% 34% 30% | 11 6 5 | 9 8 1 | +2 -2 +4 | |
|
1.03 1.00 1.02 | 198 202 186 | 46 27 19 | / 46 25 21 / | 28 16 12 | 0 +2 -2 | 75% 75% 76% | 127 124 130 | 24% 22% 28% | 6 3 3 | 9 5 4 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.92 0.49 0.73 | 159 184 119 | 36 25 11 | / 48 25 23 / | 21 12 9 | -12 0 -12 | 66% 67% 66% | 103 129 72 | 28% 32% 21% | 4 3 1 | 8 3 5 | -4 0 -4 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.24 1.57 0.92 | 256 255 257 | 22 12 10 | / 16 5 11 / | 4 3 1 | +6 +7 -1 | 79% 83% 75% | 171 180 162 | 27% 34% 20% | 5 2 3 | 3 2 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.13 1.48 0.78 | 264 291 239 | 21 13 8 | / 18 7 11 / | 7 3 4 | +3 +6 -3 | 71% 83% 58% | 174 179 168 | 24% 26% 21% | 2 2 0 | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.88 1.43 0.32 | 212 339 87 | 17 14 3 | / 19 8 11 / | 13 6 7 | -2 +6 -8 | 75% 83% 67% | 136 223 50 | 31% 36% 15% | 1 1 0 | 4 0 4 | -3 +1 -4 | |
|
0.67 0.91 0.44 | 139 132 147 | 12 7 5 | / 16 5 11 / | 3 2 1 | -4 +2 -6 | 67% 92% 42% | 95 80 111 | 14% 5% 23% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.66 0.63 0.70 | 131 109 155 | 11 5 6 | / 18 7 11 / | 4 2 2 | -7 -2 -5 | 75% 83% 67% | 92 70 114 | 23% 20% 25% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.45 2.04 0.85 | 275 335 216 | 24 16 8 | / 15 5 10 / | 8 5 3 | +9 +11 -2 | 75% 92% 58% | 175 232 118 | 29% 25% 42% | 3 1 2 | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.21 1.39 1.04 | 209 227 192 | 19 11 8 | / 16 6 10 / | 9 6 3 | +3 +5 -2 | 83% 92% 75% | 130 116 144 | 25% 19% 33% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.17 1.20 1.14 | 214 196 233 | 16 8 8 | / 14 5 9 / | 7 4 3 | +2 +3 -1 | 67% 75% 58% | 148 141 154 | 35% 44% 30% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.80 1.12 0.47 | 171 236 107 | 14 10 4 | / 20 9 11 / | 4 3 1 | -6 +1 -7 | 75% 92% 58% | 120 155 86 | 27% 32% 19% | 5 3 2 | 2 1 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
0.77 1.22 0.32 | 157 200 116 | 14 10 4 | / 18 7 11 / | 8 6 2 | -4 +3 -7 | 63% 83% 42% | 110 146 74 | 31% 36% 21% | 2 2 0 | 3 1 2 | -1 +1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.27 0.62 1.60 | 301 163 371 | 17 4 13 | / 15 5 10 / | 5 0 5 | +2 -1 +3 | 67% 50% 75% | 195 102 241 | 23% 14% 24% | 4 0 4 | 2 2 0 | +2 -2 +4 | |
|
0.79 0.59 0.89 | 185 120 218 | 11 2 9 | / 15 5 10 / | 7 2 5 | -4 -3 -1 | 67% 67% 67% | 124 73 149 | 41% 22% 50% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.73 0.93 0.63 | 152 254 102 | 10 6 4 | / 13 5 8 / | 1 0 1 | -3 +1 -4 | 56% 67% 50% | 100 138 81 | 37% 50% 30% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.68 0.27 0.89 | 164 99 197 | 10 2 8 | / 15 5 10 / | 3 0 3 | -5 -3 -2 | 50% 33% 58% | 103 60 125 | 30% 22% 33% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.44 0.50 0.42 | 126 63 158 | 7 1 6 | / 16 4 12 / | 5 2 3 | -9 -3 -6 | 67% 67% 67% | 81 44 99 | 23% 14% 26% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.51 1.00 2.54 | 288 210 447 | 17 8 9 | / 12 9 3 / | 15 7 8 | +5 -1 +6 | 89% 83% 100% | 182 138 271 | 37% 29% 47% | 4 2 2 | 2 2 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.37 1.48 1.16 | 215 248 151 | 15 12 3 | / 9 6 3 / | 9 5 4 | +6 +6 0 | 83% 83% 83% | 134 160 83 | 29% 35% 18% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.23 1.50 0.67 | 214 259 126 | 15 12 3 | / 11 7 4 / | 4 2 2 | +4 +5 -1 | 83% 83% 83% | 134 155 92 | 33% 38% 20% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
1.10 1.10 1.09 | 170 211 88 | 11 10 1 | / 10 8 2 / | 4 1 3 | +1 +2 -1 | 72% 67% 83% | 122 153 61 | 29% 43% 8% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.03 0.67 1.76 | 244 193 347 | 16 8 8 | / 13 10 3 / | 4 3 1 | +3 -2 +5 | 61% 58% 67% | 164 128 236 | 18% 14% 22% | 3 1 2 | 5 5 0 | -2 -4 +2 |
flamecomet [#5]as a liquid fan NAVI 2-0 them, im tired of being delusional the truth is nats & enzo need to wake up and preform because the liquid fans have been losing patience for some time now.
My question is. Out of everyone on the APeks roster, how did the IGL end up being not only the worst player to come from it, but also the worst IGL? 3 players from APeks are now IGLs for partnered teams and Enzo is by far the worst one.
Penqu1N [#7]My question is. Out of everyone on the APeks roster, how did the IGL end up being not only the worst player to come from it, but also the worst IGL? 3 players from APeks are now IGLs for partnered teams and Enzo is by far the worst one.
I blame the coaching staff tbh Enzo's calling was definitely Tier 1 when he was in APEKS
flamecomet [#5]as a liquid fan NAVI 2-0 them, im tired of being delusional the truth is nats & enzo need to wake up and preform because the liquid fans have been losing patience for some time now.
i also agree w you, winning to navi would just be a miracle, but I still think that navi can 2-0 them, I hate the map pool they pick, I like enzo at first because I think he's more effective igl than redgar, but I just don't really see the point that an igl should be a bottom fragger or weak player bc he does the calls,and tbh nats did MORE igl calls than enzo just agreeing to nats all the time, I hate that he's one to be interviewed when they beat koi, when they all carry him. i still think how many teams they might beat this season, if they have igl like that they won't make it to champions, so many good players you can substitute to enzo. he's far to even call a mid player, bc he is not a good player. nats need a better igl. i know enzo try it hard but it's just not it, they need a more effective igl who also plays very well. they also need a better coach. everything that comes from their coach mouth is major copium.
Gutssz [#16]NAVI LIQUIDIN ANANAS
Mistic ve enzo tier 2 oyunculardır ama bence bütün takımı yeniden kurmaları gerekiyor koçuda yollamaları lazım
emirerays [#17]Mistic ve enzo tier 2 oyunculardır ama bence bütün takımı yeniden kurmaları gerekiyor koçuda yollamaları lazım
sikin geçin 26-0 atın kardesım ben mı soylıyım bunu
nAts Jamppi etrafına Sayfı tutup marteen + Enzo almak zor olmamalıydı mk
Gutssz [#18]sikin geçin 26-0 atın kardesım ben mı soylıyım bunu
nAts Jamppi etrafına Sayfı tutup marteen + Enzo almak zor olmamalıydı mk
maalesef ki tek akıllı sen değilsin
vV1S [#19]maalesef ki tek akıllı sen değilsin
hollanda + LOUD ne iyi duruyormus mk
micky van de ven misin be ag
jnm16 [#9]i also agree w you, winning to navi would just be a miracle, but I still think that navi can 2-0 them, I hate the map pool they pick, I like enzo at first because I think he's more effective igl than redgar, but I just don't really see the point that an igl should be a bottom fragger or weak player bc he does the calls,and tbh nats did MORE igl calls than enzo just agreeing to nats all the time, I hate that he's one to be interviewed when they beat koi, when they all carry him. i still think how many teams they might beat this season, if they have igl like that they won't make it to champions, so many good players you can substitute to enzo. he's far to even call a mid player, bc he is not a good player. nats need a better igl. i know enzo try it hard but it's just not it, they need a more effective igl who also plays very well. they also need a better coach. everything that comes from their coach mouth is major copium.
nAts doesn't trust enzo as IGL. nAts appear not to have the level of respect for the Apeks core. You will notice when he streams and duo with mistic or enzo he goes like "why? is there a problem? do you not agree?" when they discuss about a play or something.
zahin1018 [#8]I blame the coaching staff tbh Enzo's calling was definitely Tier 1 when he was in APEKS
Calling maybe, but dropping 6 kills a game is still terrible, regardless of if you’re an IGL or not. I agree, get rid of Emil though.
levIAFno [#40]Could be a NAVI win honestly, TL are not looking that good Recent Matches
Like a navi 2-0 xdd
9zze [#44]Imagine throwing a molly that loses you the map
nah his chances was 35-40% after he threw shit molly chances became like 5%
yippykovac [#50]Arrdis trying to stun with 10 seconds left then 1v1 mollying yourself thats just rough
Plain stupidity
AuraFLN [#62]What the hell did i watch?
Navi against VIT looked like Prime FNC and now they play like Koi and BBL combinated!WP TL i guess
valorant is a random game lmao what u expect
Gutssz [#20]hollanda + LOUD ne iyi duruyormus mk
micky van de ven misin be ag
LOUD'u kaldırdım ya, jinggg gelince PRX saflarına döndüm geri. Hollanda bayrağı da, Limburg'da yaşadığım için.
vV1S [#115]LOUD'u kaldırdım ya, jinggg gelince PRX saflarına döndüm geri. Hollanda bayrağı da, Limburg'da yaşadığım için.
Geçen sene TL'den tek istediğim adam gibi bir IGL almalarıydı ve gidip Enzo'yu aldılar. Neden diye de soramıyorum yani o kadar büyük bir organizasyon elinde imkan olsa değerlendirirlerdi diye düşünüyorum, kala kala Enzo'ya kaldık. Adam elinde odin olmasa frag alamıyor.
vV1S [#116]Geçen sene TL'den tek istediğim adam gibi bir IGL almalarıydı ve gidip Enzo'yu aldılar. Neden diye de soramıyorum yani o kadar büyük bir organizasyon elinde imkan olsa değerlendirirlerdi diye düşünüyorum, kala kala Enzo'ya kaldık. Adam elinde odin olmasa frag alamıyor.
vanity - Sayf - nAts - Jamppi - marteen kadrosunu deneyipte kuramadılarsa tek sebebi Liquid istemediğindendir herhalde yoksa Liquid bu oyunculardan ret yiyecek kadar küçük bir org değil
Overlay [#25]nAts doesn't trust enzo as IGL. nAts appear not to have the level of respect for the Apeks core. You will notice when he streams and duo with mistic or enzo he goes like "why? is there a problem? do you not agree?" when they discuss about a play or something.
they said they have chemistry on papers, but I feel like that chemistry will just washed nats and jamppi esp when enzo clutches and you know it all goes wrong, they just let it pass even though enzo could've clutched or have ez kills., enzo will just smile like he didn't do anything wrong will only troll. i don't think chemistry is something tl should focus on their roster. something's off really like I hope nats have better igl and teammates with no big ego. apeks core got big ego really.