Kang Kang
JINGGG
Leo
Less
Demon1 (smokes)
Unbeatable.
0
Best all star team. Only 1 player from each team
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
wykes [#5]Aspas - Duelist
kiNgg - Flex + Igl
Sacy - Initiator
Alfajer - Sentinel
Demon1 - Smokes
kiNgg igl… this team would lose to the Guard
Okoretro [#8]kiNgg igl… this team would lose to the Guard
kiNgg is a good igl, Onur wanted him, and onur is very harsh on that topic.
the problem of LEV is not him.
and with sacy helping on the mid round this team would be deadly. + highest rating for a flex player if im not mistaken, 1.21 on americas.
wykes [#9]kiNgg is a good igl, Onur wanted him, and onur is very harsh on that topic.
the problem of LEV is not him.
and with sacy helping on the mid round this team would be deadly. + highest rating for a flex player if im not mistaken, 1.21 on americas.
the problem with lev was kinggs subpar mid rounding and onurs refusal to antistrat
to this day i still dont know why he does not "believe" in anti strating
Okoretro [#11]the problem with lev was kinggs subpar mid rounding and onurs refusal to antistrat
to this day i still dont know why he does not "believe" in anti strating
where did he say that he does not believe in anti strat?
+sacy would fix mid round problem, and kingg is a solid IGL.
Okoretro [#11]the problem with lev was kinggs subpar mid rounding and onurs refusal to antistrat
to this day i still dont know why he does not "believe" in anti strating
Anti-strating is only useful if the enemy team is repeating some patterns during a certain period of time. So you will need:
1) Volume (Because you can't adapt based on 1 or 2 maps)
2) Time (Because you can't adapt based on maps played 1 or 2 months ago)
3) Explotaible Patterns (Patterns are not a bad thing, having non-balanced is).
If you played Poker at a decent level you will know what I am talking about.
Trying to anti-strat every team in every moment would be like to trying to predict the price of tomorrow based on the prices of the past. Only god can.
Also if you are focusing too much on the enemy team and not in your own plan your players will play the game expecting that the enemy do the thing you saw in the review. That could be a problem because if the enemy is doing something different and you don't adapt fast your team is going to play way too passive / reactive.
I think is a better approach to prepare your team to be capable to detect what the enemy is doing and adapt on the fly. This is a common knowledge shared among many players. For example Leaf was talking about it some time ago https://twitter.com/leaf_cs/status/1671717542593806339
There is one more thing. The better the team, the less exploitable patterns they will have.
Once Pep Guardiola told Marcelo Bielsa (I admire him) that no one knew more about Barcelona's playstyle than him. And Marcelo responded that information was useless. At the moment they tried to stop Barcelona it didn't help them at all. They lost 3-0 (ATH. Bilbao vs Barcelona, Copa del rey 2012). You can watch the story here if you are interested. He ends up admitting that he only did that job to feel better about himself. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkwKsHWvDGY
I hope I shared some light on this topic.
onurtgreat [#14]Anti-strating is only useful if the enemy team is repeating some patterns during a certain period of time. So you will need:
1) Volume (Because you can't adapt based on 1 or 2 maps)
2) Time (Because you can't adapt based on maps played 1 or 2 months ago)
3) Explotaible Patterns (Patterns are not a bad thing, having non-balanced is).
If you played Poker at a decent level you will know what I am talking about.
Trying to anti-strat every team in every moment would be like to trying to predict the price of tomorrow based on the prices of the past. Only god can.
Also if you are focusing too much on the enemy team and not in your own plan your players will play the game expecting that the enemy do the thing you saw in the review. That could be a problem because if the enemy is doing something different and you don't adapt fast your team is going to play way too passive / reactive.
I think is a better approach to prepare your team to be capable to detect what the enemy is doing and adapt on the fly. This is a common knowledge shared among many players. For example Leaf was talking about it some time ago https://twitter.com/leaf_cs/status/1671717542593806339
There is one more thing. The better the team, the less exploitable patterns they will have.
Once Pep Guardiola told Marcelo Bielsa (I admire him) that no one knew more about Barcelona's playstyle than him. And Marcelo responded that information was useless. At the moment they tried to stop Barcelona it didn't help them at all. They lost 3-0 (ATH. Bilbao vs Barcelona, Copa del rey 2012). You can watch the story here if you are interested. He ends up admitting that he only did that job to feel better about himself. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkwKsHWvDGY
I hope I shared some light on this topic.
W
onurtgreat [#14]Anti-strating is only useful if the enemy team is repeating some patterns during a certain period of time. So you will need:
1) Volume (Because you can't adapt based on 1 or 2 maps)
2) Time (Because you can't adapt based on maps played 1 or 2 months ago)
3) Explotaible Patterns (Patterns are not a bad thing, having non-balanced is).
If you played Poker at a decent level you will know what I am talking about.
Trying to anti-strat every team in every moment would be like to trying to predict the price of tomorrow based on the prices of the past. Only god can.
Also if you are focusing too much on the enemy team and not in your own plan your players will play the game expecting that the enemy do the thing you saw in the review. That could be a problem because if the enemy is doing something different and you don't adapt fast your team is going to play way too passive / reactive.
I think is a better approach to prepare your team to be capable to detect what the enemy is doing and adapt on the fly. This is a common knowledge shared among many players. For example Leaf was talking about it some time ago https://twitter.com/leaf_cs/status/1671717542593806339
There is one more thing. The better the team, the less exploitable patterns they will have.
Once Pep Guardiola told Marcelo Bielsa (I admire him) that no one knew more about Barcelona's playstyle than him. And Marcelo responded that information was useless. At the moment they tried to stop Barcelona it didn't help them at all. They lost 3-0 (ATH. Bilbao vs Barcelona, Copa del rey 2012). You can watch the story here if you are interested. He ends up admitting that he only did that job to feel better about himself. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkwKsHWvDGY
I hope I shared some light on this topic.
mi reyyy
onurtgreat [#14]Anti-strating is only useful if the enemy team is repeating some patterns during a certain period of time. So you will need:
1) Volume (Because you can't adapt based on 1 or 2 maps)
2) Time (Because you can't adapt based on maps played 1 or 2 months ago)
3) Explotaible Patterns (Patterns are not a bad thing, having non-balanced is).
If you played Poker at a decent level you will know what I am talking about.
Trying to anti-strat every team in every moment would be like to trying to predict the price of tomorrow based on the prices of the past. Only god can.
Also if you are focusing too much on the enemy team and not in your own plan your players will play the game expecting that the enemy do the thing you saw in the review. That could be a problem because if the enemy is doing something different and you don't adapt fast your team is going to play way too passive / reactive.
I think is a better approach to prepare your team to be capable to detect what the enemy is doing and adapt on the fly. This is a common knowledge shared among many players. For example Leaf was talking about it some time ago https://twitter.com/leaf_cs/status/1671717542593806339
There is one more thing. The better the team, the less exploitable patterns they will have.
Once Pep Guardiola told Marcelo Bielsa (I admire him) that no one knew more about Barcelona's playstyle than him. And Marcelo responded that information was useless. At the moment they tried to stop Barcelona it didn't help them at all. They lost 3-0 (ATH. Bilbao vs Barcelona, Copa del rey 2012). You can watch the story here if you are interested. He ends up admitting that he only did that job to feel better about himself. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkwKsHWvDGY
I hope I shared some light on this topic.
very insightful mr onur
Discord