Sentinals vs RNG
Sentinals 2-0
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.14 1.17 1.13 | 287 300 278 | 20 10 10 | / 16 6 10 / | 3 1 2 | +4 +4 0 | 75% 88% 67% | 183 182 184 | 27% 35% 22% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
1.04 0.76 1.23 | 264 202 307 | 19 6 13 | / 17 7 10 / | 3 2 1 | +2 -1 +3 | 65% 63% 67% | 167 156 175 | 28% 36% 24% | 5 2 3 | 2 2 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
0.96 0.65 1.17 | 208 160 241 | 15 5 10 | / 15 8 7 / | 4 3 1 | 0 -3 +3 | 70% 75% 67% | 147 113 170 | 15% 29% 11% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.81 0.57 0.97 | 198 172 216 | 12 3 9 | / 16 7 9 / | 5 3 2 | -4 -4 0 | 65% 63% 67% | 136 125 143 | 29% 24% 32% | 4 0 4 | 3 2 1 | +1 -2 +3 | |
|
0.51 0.57 0.47 | 131 147 122 | 8 3 5 | / 16 6 10 / | 5 4 1 | -8 -3 -5 | 65% 75% 58% | 95 92 98 | 22% 13% 30% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.27 1.11 1.52 | 261 299 205 | 20 14 6 | / 13 9 4 / | 4 2 2 | +7 +5 +2 | 75% 67% 88% | 154 178 118 | 36% 34% 42% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
1.25 1.18 1.34 | 317 258 407 | 22 12 10 | / 17 10 7 / | 7 2 5 | +5 +2 +3 | 75% 58% 100% | 183 178 190 | 13% 13% 12% | 1 1 0 | 3 3 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
1.00 0.81 1.29 | 220 214 229 | 15 8 7 | / 15 10 5 / | 5 4 1 | 0 -2 +2 | 75% 67% 88% | 132 135 127 | 18% 16% 22% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.99 0.83 1.24 | 147 139 160 | 9 5 4 | / 12 8 4 / | 10 4 6 | -3 -3 0 | 70% 58% 88% | 88 98 72 | 25% 29% 13% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.77 0.77 0.78 | 183 214 138 | 14 9 5 | / 17 11 6 / | 5 3 2 | -3 -2 -1 | 70% 67% 75% | 109 129 79 | 18% 11% 44% | 4 3 1 | 2 1 1 | +2 +2 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.08 1.44 1.27 | 245 218 272 | 50 21 29 | / 36 18 18 / | 16 6 10 | +14 +3 +11 | 73% 65% 80% | 153 140 165 | 24% 32% 18% | 6 3 3 | 4 3 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.18 1.06 1.11 | 226 234 224 | 48 25 23 | / 36 17 19 / | 12 7 5 | +12 +8 +4 | 77% 85% 70% | 140 139 142 | 21% 25% 19% | 3 1 2 | 3 0 3 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.88 1.25 1.08 | 243 240 244 | 46 20 26 | / 40 22 18 / | 14 9 5 | +6 -2 +8 | 80% 81% 80% | 145 141 148 | 22% 30% 17% | 7 4 3 | 6 3 3 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.60 1.40 1.03 | 248 163 320 | 45 12 33 | / 42 22 20 / | 14 7 7 | +3 -10 +13 | 73% 65% 80% | 152 119 180 | 22% 28% 20% | 15 5 10 | 8 5 3 | +7 0 +7 | |
|
1.13 0.63 0.86 | 173 206 143 | 35 20 15 | / 38 17 21 / | 15 9 6 | -3 +3 -6 | 75% 85% 67% | 100 119 84 | 15% 15% 15% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.94 1.09 1.01 | 228 229 230 | 48 27 21 | / 45 25 20 / | 9 5 4 | +3 +2 +1 | 59% 50% 69% | 134 139 128 | 35% 33% 37% | 1 0 1 | 4 2 2 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.77 1.09 0.92 | 209 198 219 | 41 19 22 | / 46 26 20 / | 12 7 5 | -5 -7 +2 | 63% 57% 69% | 125 124 125 | 20% 16% 26% | 6 4 2 | 5 3 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.74 1.11 0.92 | 174 149 201 | 31 14 17 | / 41 24 17 / | 20 9 11 | -10 -10 0 | 66% 57% 77% | 100 85 118 | 24% 26% 23% | 6 3 3 | 5 3 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.93 0.78 0.86 | 208 201 226 | 40 22 18 | / 47 25 22 / | 16 8 8 | -7 -3 -4 | 64% 53% 77% | 136 145 125 | 14% 15% 13% | 6 4 2 | 6 4 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.62 0.78 0.69 | 183 198 169 | 32 16 16 | / 45 28 17 / | 12 9 3 | -13 -12 -1 | 63% 60% 65% | 116 130 100 | 14% 16% 10% | 5 1 4 | 12 6 6 | -7 -5 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.44 1.23 1.85 | 249 243 262 | 18 11 7 | / 10 8 2 / | 3 2 1 | +8 +3 +5 | 67% 58% 83% | 143 149 131 | 22% 26% 14% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.33 1.36 1.27 | 230 241 210 | 16 11 5 | / 11 8 3 / | 7 6 1 | +5 +3 +2 | 89% 92% 83% | 141 150 124 | 16% 17% 13% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.33 1.23 1.53 | 270 220 371 | 19 11 8 | / 12 8 4 / | 7 3 4 | +7 +3 +4 | 94% 92% 100% | 135 132 141 | 16% 25% 7% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.84 1.04 0.45 | 237 272 169 | 13 10 3 | / 14 9 5 / | 7 5 2 | -1 +1 -2 | 89% 92% 83% | 159 201 75 | 29% 36% 8% | 2 1 1 | 4 2 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.78 0.56 1.22 | 191 184 206 | 12 7 5 | / 14 11 3 / | 5 3 2 | -2 -4 +2 | 72% 67% 83% | 123 134 101 | 20% 33% 4% | 5 4 1 | 4 3 1 | +1 +1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.28 1.43 1.21 | 266 327 236 | 16 7 9 | / 15 6 9 / | 5 1 4 | +1 +1 0 | 78% 83% 75% | 139 114 152 | 27% 27% 27% | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.06 0.35 1.41 | 217 123 264 | 14 2 12 | / 14 5 9 / | 3 2 1 | 0 -3 +3 | 56% 50% 58% | 130 68 161 | 22% 13% 24% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.62 0.50 0.67 | 161 134 176 | 9 2 7 | / 15 5 10 / | 4 2 2 | -6 -3 -3 | 67% 50% 75% | 99 85 106 | 4% 0% 8% | 2 1 1 | 2 0 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.55 0.45 0.61 | 186 149 205 | 12 4 8 | / 18 6 12 / | 2 1 1 | -6 -2 -4 | 44% 33% 50% | 110 73 128 | 28% 11% 35% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.51 0.32 0.61 | 175 170 178 | 10 2 8 | / 16 6 10 / | 3 2 1 | -6 -4 -2 | 61% 67% 58% | 109 106 110 | 6% 6% 6% | 2 0 2 | 4 1 3 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.52 0.71 1.93 | 356 108 481 | 21 2 19 | / 12 4 8 / | 4 1 3 | +9 -2 +11 | 83% 67% 92% | 199 82 257 | 20% 20% 20% | 6 1 5 | 1 0 1 | +5 +1 +4 | |
|
1.45 0.86 1.74 | 283 281 285 | 18 5 13 | / 11 5 6 / | 3 1 2 | +7 0 +7 | 83% 67% 92% | 128 59 163 | 23% 11% 26% | 4 2 2 | 1 1 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.36 1.20 1.44 | 223 187 242 | 13 4 9 | / 9 3 6 / | 10 2 8 | +4 +1 +3 | 89% 83% 92% | 148 100 172 | 22% 50% 15% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.87 0.83 0.89 | 161 131 177 | 12 4 8 | / 9 3 6 / | 2 0 2 | +3 +1 +2 | 67% 67% 67% | 91 58 108 | 21% 50% 17% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.78 1.67 0.34 | 118 255 50 | 8 6 2 | / 10 3 7 / | 3 2 1 | -2 +3 -5 | 67% 83% 58% | 71 127 43 | 6% 5% 8% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.17 1.01 1.49 | 238 200 314 | 16 9 7 | / 14 10 4 / | 3 2 1 | +2 -1 +3 | 56% 42% 83% | 135 132 143 | 41% 46% 36% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.94 0.97 0.87 | 226 220 239 | 13 8 5 | / 15 10 5 / | 4 2 2 | -2 -2 0 | 61% 50% 83% | 136 148 114 | 22% 23% 19% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.68 0.90 0.23 | 146 177 86 | 9 8 1 | / 15 10 5 / | 5 4 1 | -6 -2 -4 | 50% 50% 50% | 121 142 80 | 33% 35% 29% | 3 2 1 | 1 1 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.53 0.57 0.45 | 154 197 69 | 7 6 1 | / 14 12 2 / | 4 3 1 | -7 -6 -1 | 50% 50% 50% | 106 137 45 | 17% 24% 0% | 2 1 1 | 5 3 2 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.46 0.31 0.76 | 108 70 186 | 6 2 4 | / 14 10 4 / | 5 4 1 | -8 -8 0 | 50% 42% 67% | 76 58 111 | 20% 18% 21% | 0 0 0 | 4 3 1 | -4 -3 -1 |
Swiftmal [#8]Soniqs won’t beat renegades
we literally beat them twice in a row in convincing fashion
cloud9bluefan [#14]Honestly such a free bracket for sentinels but soni vs rng will be fun to watch considering their rivalry in nsg and smaller tournaments
L
HackNaija [#15]100t will lose to TSM, not even better than SoaR dont talk to me
guys mad cause his favorite team lost to 13 yr olds twice in a row lol get your Tier 3 soniqs outta here bud
NU_Peri [#1]Sentinals vs RNG
Sentinals 2-0
Unlucky for SEN they have to go against SQ. Next qualifiers maybe LMAO
Gomes255 [#17]yo what you feelin about this one Naija?
should be convincing 2-0, move them up to tier 1 val
FlamephoenixYz [#24]guys mad cause his favorite team lost to 13 yr olds twice in a row lol get your Tier 3 soniqs outta here bud
whos laughing now
hekzy [#33]I swear soniqs have been in NA for half a year and they've only played RNG and sentinels
3 months
Dylxn [#3]SEN vs RNG
Renegades have shown time and time again that they have what it takes to beat Soniqs, and I think they will once again.
cap
Dylxn [#3]SEN vs RNG
Renegades have shown time and time again that they have what it takes to beat Soniqs, and I think they will once again.
Soniqs beat them last theee times they played retard
HackNaija [#31]should be convincing 2-0, move them up to tier 1 val
truly the next berlin masters champions
Cheasle2 [#46]Should be a free win for Soniqs. Never even heard of Sentinels.
Lmfao prepare to be devastated
Enjibi [#19]This is most likely going to be SQ vs SEN if SQ continues the trend of beating RNG
unluko for RNG to lose close games. Still, hyped to see SEN-SQ rematch!
Soniqs 2-0 SEN, TenZ already has an excuse for losing lined up on Twitter before the match starts https://twitter.com/TenZOfficial/status/1411097387771170820
In all seriousness, SEN should be heavily favored but Soniqs are grinding hard in Tier 2 tournaments while apparently SEN haven't been scrimming, I really hope they don't get complacent.
Gloskii [#64]Lmfao iight remember that when my boys eat 🤣
"Lmfao iight remember that when my boys eat 🤣" please be less cringy next time
llAntll [#72]Sen 2-1 like last time, I assume they’ll play Icebox, Split and Haven so I have Sen winning Icebox, Sonics winning Split, and Sen taking Haven
last time they faced off in split soniqs got 13-0d by sen
RRoadRRunneRR [#74]sentinels will lose here (matchfixing once again!)
when you lose in ranked do you also blame it on your teammates matchfixing?
item [#70]Soniqs 2-0 SEN, TenZ already has an excuse for losing lined up on Twitter before the match starts https://twitter.com/TenZOfficial/status/1411097387771170820
In all seriousness, SEN should be heavily favored but Soniqs are grinding hard in Tier 2 tournaments while apparently SEN haven't been scrimming, I really hope they don't get complacent.
Really wish Soniqs win here :)
notkushal [#85]Does anybody know where is it going to be stream?
My guy download twitch and search nerd street gamers itll be live in 30 mins :)
cloud9bluefan [#14]Honestly such a free bracket for sentinels but soni vs rng will be fun to watch considering their rivalry in nsg and smaller tournaments
I mean, they should have the easiest bracket because no matter who they play they most likely qualify, so you would put teams that wouldn't qualify anyway against them
Rimuru_T [#20]SONIQ 2-1 SEN I BELIEVE, Shahzam will underperform, but still could go either way
If anyone underperforms it will not be shahzam, way too consistent
Gloskii [#64]Lmfao iight remember that when my boys eat 🤣
hello there, allow me to introduce myself, karma nice to meet u
Gomes255 [#105]To be honest i feel like Tenz is dragging sentinels down. I feel like Tenz is slowly becoming a boomer and focusing to much time on his girlfriend. I think they should sign someone like flexinja instead because he is much better mechanically
Nah sign Ninja
HackNaija [#15]100t will lose to TSM, not even better than SoaR dont talk to me
well you were right about soniqs v sen, but dead wrong with 100T lol
MilanTheMyth [#101]Looking at it live, Its funny now that an Australian team is 1-0 against Sentinels in a NA event.
OCE >EU proved lol
beatje [#110]https://twitter.com/tenzofficial/status/1411412433017610244?s=21
Typical the first thing every team that had a honeymoon phase blame after a loss is ping
PrTsty [#122]U have a sen banner
That’s just for decoration. When it really matters, the fans of underdogs will come out.
Nasreddin [#71]"Lmfao iight remember that when my boys eat 🤣" please be less cringy next time
Lmfao shut up pussy you soft in real life who says cringy you a whole boy 🥴💀 you don’t get no hoes and it shows 🤣🤣🤣
sheeesh_gamer [#132]I love that this is a dub for NA and an L for EU at the same time....
A Tier 2 NA team is strong and can take a map off of SEN.
Meanwhile the best EU teams could not get 1 map even.This is also an L for australia as their best team is still just tier 2.
an expected take from sheeesh gamer
beatje [#110]https://twitter.com/tenzofficial/status/1411412433017610244?s=21
what ping is he playing on? like 50? what a crybaby
sheeesh_gamer [#132]I love that this is a dub for NA and an L for EU at the same time....
A Tier 2 NA team is strong and can take a map off of SEN.
Meanwhile the best EU teams could not get 1 map even.This is also an L for australia as their best team is still just tier 2.
bro it aint over yet shut up before you jinx it
Gloskii [#125]Lmfao shut up pussy you soft in real life who says cringy you a whole boy 🥴💀 you don’t get no hoes and it shows 🤣🤣🤣
Lmfaoooooo Sen for the dub 🤣 I thought I bitch ni*** said some 😭🤣🤣🤣💀💀💀💀💀 smd
Derke_choked_in_finals [#120]Typical the first thing every team that had a honeymoon phase blame after a loss is ping
How is this the honeymoon. Didnt the honeymoon phase end when they were kicked out of qualifiers by BBG?
ArgieGR8ArgieB8ArgieM8 [#130]Anyone who thinks Soniqs have a chance on Haven is clowning. Go next qualifier.
where is ur fnatic flair?
Neon74 [#140]nt Soniqs, you at least made TenZ cry and write excuses on Twitter
as he 4ks them back to back
item [#70]Soniqs 2-0 SEN, TenZ already has an excuse for losing lined up on Twitter before the match starts https://twitter.com/TenZOfficial/status/1411097387771170820
In all seriousness, SEN should be heavily favored but Soniqs are grinding hard in Tier 2 tournaments while apparently SEN haven't been scrimming, I really hope they don't get complacent.
SEN have been scrimming but apparently they've been rolling all their teams so it's only been 1 hour max scrims.
sins [#145]where is ur fnatic flair?
where is ur flair? idk.. the forum bugs out every time there is high traffic and removes flairs for some reason
Neon74 [#140]nt Soniqs, you at least made TenZ cry and write excuses on Twitter
I know this is bait but at a high level 20ping diff compared to the rest of the lobby is a noticeable difference
ArgieGR8ArgieB8ArgieM8 [#148]where is ur flair? idk.. the forum bugs out every time there is high traffic and removes flairs for some reason
oh shit wtf server located in north korea or what
eMdeee [#149]I know this is bait but at a high level 20ping diff compared to the rest of the lobby is a noticeable difference
will he keep saying the same thing about the ping? Last time he tweeted he was moving to LA, then he said he did not have good ping and today he said he had the vaccine. Stop with excuses cause he's not the only one player from Canada
connorwalsh [#152]will he keep saying the same thing about the ping? Last time he tweeted he was moving to LA, then he said he did not have good ping and today he said he had the vaccine. Stop with excuses cause he's not the only one player from Canada
I mean we saw a big difference in performance from him online and at masters Lan. I think you can give him the benefit of doubt until proven otherwise. People were saying he would choke on Lan but he preformed better on Lan than he does online.
connorwalsh [#152]will he keep saying the same thing about the ping? Last time he tweeted he was moving to LA, then he said he did not have good ping and today he said he had the vaccine. Stop with excuses cause he's not the only one player from Canada
I mean if he keeps saying the ping is pissing him off then he should do something about it (ie move already) but I don't think him bitching about it is that deep
Baerne [#161]Wow, you're so mad
not rly dont care about LULtinels, they were shit on Icebox, seems like Shahz has no strats on Icebox
but TBH I don't blame them for not having strats, the map is so bad
sport2793 [#143]Stupid SQ fans, didn't learn your lesson from last time. You now know your place.
On a serious note, it's funny how months have passed yet SQs map pool hasn't changed at all. Tier 1 on Icebox, tier scrub on everything else.
sorry that they made your king (TenZ) cry on Twitter about living in canada after they lost first map
Neon74 [#163]not rly dont care about LULtinels, they were shit on Icebox, seems like Shahz has no strats on Icebox
but TBH I don't blame them for not having strats, the map is so bad
You know better, you should go pro honestly
Neon74 [#163]not rly dont care about LULtinels, they were shit on Icebox, seems like Shahz has no strats on Icebox
but TBH I don't blame them for not having strats, the map is so bad
they counterstrating i think, but the map is so bad
Neon74 [#134]what ping is he playing on? like 50? what a crybaby
thats shit for pro play dumbass, i agree tenz whines about stuff too much, but for pro play 50 ping is a sizeable disadvantage.
Neon74 [#163]not rly dont care about LULtinels, they were shit on Icebox, seems like Shahz has no strats on Icebox
but TBH I don't blame them for not having strats, the map is so bad
Thats why they lost to fnatic on icebox
gl1tch [#151]SQ FANS SILENTTTTT
Hardly bro, I think I can speak for all SQ fans and say we are really impressed with the effort shown. Super promising of their growth as players and as a team as a whole
GhostCat [#172]Thats why they lost to fnatic on icebox
sentinels lost to fnatic? or fnatic lost to sentinels? on icebox
sheeesh_gamer [#132]I love that this is a dub for NA and an L for EU at the same time....
A Tier 2 NA team is strong and can take a map off of SEN.
Meanwhile the best EU teams could not get 1 map even.This is also an L for australia as their best team is still just tier 2.
How is this a L for Australia? An Australian team was able to take 1 map off of the worlds best team.
sheeesh_gamer [#132]I love that this is a dub for NA and an L for EU at the same time....
A Tier 2 NA team is strong and can take a map off of SEN.
Meanwhile the best EU teams could not get 1 map even.This is also an L for australia as their best team is still just tier 2.
Wait... I don’t understand how you guys think sq is so called tier 2... they had a blow for blow game with the best team in the world ffs. If you pay any attention to valorant esports you would notice that, the only events sq “does bad” in they have alr qualified for finals. It is clear that they are better then at least renegades and if you look at the results they performed better then tier 1 Europe. Make up your mind...
Howard [#178]what happened to soniqs....
its the sentinels curse
u do reallly well against them and then u fall
like G2 beat them and then the y fell off
soniqs took a map off them and then they fell off