Ez 4 eg
Potter might manage to get above 10 kills across both maps
Temperature
EG
|
pho
EG
|
BRANTED
EG
|
roca
EG
|
potter
EG
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
7
4
+3
|
2
9
-7
|
8
3
+5
|
10
4
+6
|
6
3
+3
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
9
10
-1
|
3
2
+1
|
6
4
+2
|
8
4
+4
|
5
3
+2
|
TenZ
SEN
|
6
9
-3
|
9
7
+2
|
12
8
+4
|
8
4
+4
|
13
2
+11
|
dapr
SEN
|
9
6
+3
|
7
5
+2
|
4
3
+1
|
1
7
-6
|
7
5
+2
|
SicK
SEN
|
7
10
-3
|
9
7
+2
|
6
5
+1
|
9
4
+5
|
2
3
-1
|
Temperature
EG
|
pho
EG
|
BRANTED
EG
|
roca
EG
|
potter
EG
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
2
0
+2
|
0
1
-1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
1
3
-2
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
1
+0
|
2
1
+1
|
1
3
-2
|
2
2
+0
|
3
0
+3
|
dapr
SEN
|
1
2
-1
|
2
0
+2
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
SicK
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
1
0
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
0
1
-1
|
Temperature
EG
|
pho
EG
|
BRANTED
EG
|
roca
EG
|
potter
EG
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
|
2
0
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
10
|
2
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
75
|
1
|
0
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
6
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
7
|
0
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
3
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
43
|
2
|
1
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
4
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
5
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
1
|
0
|
Temperature
EG
|
|
1
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
0
|
0
|
pho
EG
|
|
7
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
0
|
1
|
roca
EG
|
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
0
|
0
|
potter
EG
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
6
|
0
|
BRANTED
EG
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
0
|
1
|
Temperature
EG
|
pho
EG
|
BRANTED
EG
|
roca
EG
|
potter
EG
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
5
1
+4
|
2
4
-2
|
5
2
+3
|
6
3
+3
|
4
3
+1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
3
6
-3
|
1
1
+0
|
4
2
+2
|
2
3
-1
|
3
2
+1
|
TenZ
SEN
|
2
4
-2
|
7
3
+4
|
4
6
-2
|
5
2
+3
|
6
1
+5
|
dapr
SEN
|
7
2
+5
|
3
3
+0
|
1
2
-1
|
1
4
-3
|
4
4
+0
|
SicK
SEN
|
4
7
-3
|
3
2
+1
|
5
3
+2
|
4
2
+2
|
1
1
+0
|
Temperature
EG
|
pho
EG
|
BRANTED
EG
|
roca
EG
|
potter
EG
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
2
1
+1
|
0
2
-2
|
2
1
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
dapr
SEN
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
1
+0
|
|
Temperature
EG
|
pho
EG
|
BRANTED
EG
|
roca
EG
|
potter
EG
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
|
2
0
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
3
Round 5
BRANTED
pho
Round 14
Temperature
potter
Round 23
pho
BRANTED
|
2
Round 3
pho
BRANTED
potter
Round 13
pho
BRANTED
roca
|
1
Round 15
potter
Temperature
roca
pho
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
1
|
0
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
1
Round 2
Temperature
BRANTED
|
2
Round 8
pho
roca
Temperature
Round 11
Temperature
pho
BRANTED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
5
|
0
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
1
Round 4
Temperature
pho
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
0
|
1
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
1
Round 19
roca
Temperature
|
3
Round 7
roca
pho
Temperature
Round 16
roca
potter
BRANTED
Round 17
BRANTED
Temperature
roca
|
1
Round 18
roca
BRANTED
potter
Temperature
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
0
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
2
Round 9
pho
Temperature
Round 11
pho
roca
|
1
Round 12
potter
pho
Temperature
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
1
|
0
|
Temperature
EG
|
|
|
4
Round 6
ShahZaM
dapr
SicK
Round 18
dapr
TenZ
ShahZaM
Round 19
pho
ShahZaM
TenZ
Round 21
ShahZaM
TenZ
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
0
|
0
|
pho
EG
|
|
3
Round 6
zombs
ShahZaM
Round 7
TenZ
dapr
Round 23
TenZ
SicK
|
1
Round 17
TenZ
dapr
zombs
|
|
|
1
Round 18
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
0
|
0
|
roca
EG
|
|
1
Round 3
dapr
TenZ
|
1
Round 10
dapr
ShahZaM
zombs
|
1
Round 22
SicK
dapr
zombs
ShahZaM
|
|
1
Round 3
TenZ
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
0
|
0
|
potter
EG
|
|
3
Round 1
zombs
dapr
Round 4
TenZ
dapr
Round 8
ShahZaM
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
5
|
0
|
BRANTED
EG
|
|
2
Round 2
TenZ
ShahZaM
Round 19
dapr
zombs
|
|
|
|
1
Round 19
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
0
|
1
|
Temperature
EG
|
pho
EG
|
BRANTED
EG
|
roca
EG
|
potter
EG
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
2
3
-1
|
0
5
-5
|
3
1
+2
|
4
1
+3
|
2
0
+2
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
6
4
+2
|
2
1
+1
|
2
2
+0
|
6
1
+5
|
2
1
+1
|
TenZ
SEN
|
4
5
-1
|
2
4
-2
|
8
2
+6
|
3
2
+1
|
7
1
+6
|
dapr
SEN
|
2
4
-2
|
4
2
+2
|
3
1
+2
|
0
3
-3
|
3
1
+2
|
SicK
SEN
|
3
3
+0
|
6
5
+1
|
1
2
-1
|
5
2
+3
|
1
2
-1
|
Temperature
EG
|
pho
EG
|
BRANTED
EG
|
roca
EG
|
potter
EG
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
1
1
+0
|
|
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
1
+0
|
|
1
1
+0
|
0
1
-1
|
2
0
+2
|
dapr
SEN
|
1
1
+0
|
1
0
+1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
Temperature
EG
|
pho
EG
|
BRANTED
EG
|
roca
EG
|
potter
EG
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
7
Round 2
Temperature
BRANTED
Round 4
Temperature
potter
Round 5
roca
pho
Round 6
BRANTED
potter
Round 9
BRANTED
potter
Round 15
potter
BRANTED
Round 16
BRANTED
potter
|
|
2
Round 3
roca
BRANTED
pho
potter
Round 7
potter
roca
BRANTED
Temperature
|
|
|
1
Round 3
potter
pho
|
|
|
|
82
|
0
|
0
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
5
Round 4
BRANTED
pho
SicK
Round 13
roca
pho
Round 14
potter
roca
Round 15
roca
pho
Round 19
roca
pho
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
2
|
0
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
2
Round 6
pho
roca
Round 18
roca
potter
|
3
Round 11
roca
Temperature
BRANTED
Round 12
BRANTED
Temperature
roca
Round 17
potter
Temperature
pho
|
|
|
|
1
Round 11
Temperature
BRANTED
|
|
|
|
53
|
2
|
0
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
2
Round 9
roca
Temperature
Round 19
Temperature
potter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
4
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
3
Round 13
BRANTED
potter
Round 16
Temperature
pho
Round 18
BRANTED
pho
|
|
|
|
1
Round 16
pho
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
0
|
0
|
Temperature
EG
|
|
1
Round 9
ShahZaM
TenZ
|
4
Round 1
dapr
ShahZaM
zombs
Round 8
ShahZaM
SicK
zombs
Round 11
SicK
zombs
dapr
Round 14
dapr
SicK
TenZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
0
|
0
|
pho
EG
|
|
4
Round 1
TenZ
SicK
Round 2
zombs
TenZ
Round 9
dapr
zombs
Round 19
dapr
TenZ
|
1
Round 16
TenZ
zombs
SicK
|
|
|
1
Round 9
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
0
|
1
|
roca
EG
|
|
|
2
Round 6
SicK
TenZ
dapr
Round 10
ShahZaM
zombs
dapr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
0
|
0
|
potter
EG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
1
|
0
|
BRANTED
EG
|
|
2
Round 2
SicK
dapr
Round 17
zombs
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
1
Round 17
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
0
|
0
|
Rogue_Angel [#6]sum 2 prove abt to beat EG lol
if im being honest with u, i think thats gonna happen, but 4da memes i guess
SEN bans ascent
EG bans breeze
SEN picks split
EG picks bind
EG bans icebox
Decider Haven
SEN starts CT side
EG starts split on defense and they really have an opportunity to put the clamps on SEN, lock them down, and take the half with a scoreline of something like 10-2, easily closing the map with 13-5
On bind, Potter's masterclass calling will be on full display with the teleports probably being on fire from such a frequent use. Some of you might not know this, but Potter is actually a tactical genius and she will hit them with the "go A, but end up going B" and her second tactic "go A, but actually go A" . Little tougher in the second half, but EG still takes it 13-9.
Luckily for SEN they will have another chance in the next qualifier, but it's back to the drawing board for them. EG 2-0, worst case scenario EG 2-1 if SEN steal a lucky overtime win.
#RunEGaming
lomepal [#13]sum2prove vs sen
Nah EG just trolling just like they would in this game but instead get rolled here
NSG_Observer_2 [#1]Ez 4 eg
Potter might manage to get above 10 kills across both maps
EG sweep, I have my broom ready to go ;) Edit: Y'all know I'm joking right...? JK EG COMEBACK EZ ROCA GONNA POP OFF
CalOtter [#30]2-0 EG
This will be a test for EG but they looked real impressive today.
Excited how good EG will do against an up and coming team.
nice template g
Sova_Viper_Breach_Cypher [#20]potter drops 30 both maps eg 2-0
this is the most based take i have ever seen and i love it
xi9i [#46]Bold Prediction:
One of these teams will win
i think one of these teams will lose, idk tho its probably just me
Apollyonic [#17]It's time bois. Top 2 NA Powerhouses facing off tomorrow. Sen v. EG
potter (best player) vs tenz ( second best player)
Sogou [#57]is potter actaully good or just pp above me just cap?
watch this match and learn about the magic of potter yourself
HackNaija [#63]Predictions for how many kills potter gets across two maps? I say 5
9
2 first map
7 second map
raka_gg [#10]SEN bans ascent
EG bans breeze
SEN picks split
EG picks bind
EG bans icebox
Decider Haven
SEN starts CT sideEG starts split on defense and they really have an opportunity to put the clamps on SEN, lock them down, and take the half with a scoreline of something like 10-2, easily closing the map with 13-5
On bind, Potter's masterclass calling will be on full display with the teleports probably being on fire from such a frequent use. Some of you might not know this, but Potter is actually a tactical genius and she will hit them with the "go A, but end up going B" and her second tactic "go A, but actually go A" . Little tougher in the second half, but EG still takes it 13-9.
Luckily for SEN they will have another chance in the next qualifier, but it's back to the drawing board for them. EG 2-0, worst case scenario EG 2-1 if SEN steal a lucky overtime win.
#RunEGaming
kekw
ToastByToast [#58]watch this match and learn about the magic of potter yourself
Can we watch anywhere?
NSG_Observer_2 [#1]Ez 4 eg
Potter might manage to get above 10 kills across both maps
The match won't be streamed??
HaSanity [#97]why tf is sen making eu look bad bro just 13-0 them
If u have ever watched Sentinels play, u know they are the kings of throwing leads. It happens 90% of the time. I have given up ever judging them purely by score.
raka_gg [#10]SEN bans ascent
EG bans breeze
SEN picks split
EG picks bind
EG bans icebox
Decider Haven
SEN starts CT sideEG starts split on defense and they really have an opportunity to put the clamps on SEN, lock them down, and take the half with a scoreline of something like 10-2, easily closing the map with 13-5
On bind, Potter's masterclass calling will be on full display with the teleports probably being on fire from such a frequent use. Some of you might not know this, but Potter is actually a tactical genius and she will hit them with the "go A, but end up going B" and her second tactic "go A, but actually go A" . Little tougher in the second half, but EG still takes it 13-9.
Luckily for SEN they will have another chance in the next qualifier, but it's back to the drawing board for them. EG 2-0, worst case scenario EG 2-1 if SEN steal a lucky overtime win.
#RunEGaming
Yikes
BIGGEST_LG_FAN [#105]potter 5-15 kekw eg is fking dumb for picking roca who never plays ranked or even cares about the game and for picking this actual robot potter, eg as an org will die soon and the owner will have no money fok you eg
Cringe comment
As an honest sentinels fan, I believe that I can speak on behalf of our entire fanbase when I say that we should have lost today! EG was clearly tactically superior and we only won because of the good starts to 2nd halves of both maps. Thankfully Tenz is just superior and was able to carry us all the way. After seeing this match, I think acquiring potter as an IGL should be our priority, so shazam could focus on awping and zombs or dapr should be removed from the roster.
raka_gg [#10]SEN bans ascent
EG bans breeze
SEN picks split
EG picks bind
EG bans icebox
Decider Haven
SEN starts CT sideEG starts split on defense and they really have an opportunity to put the clamps on SEN, lock them down, and take the half with a scoreline of something like 10-2, easily closing the map with 13-5
On bind, Potter's masterclass calling will be on full display with the teleports probably being on fire from such a frequent use. Some of you might not know this, but Potter is actually a tactical genius and she will hit them with the "go A, but end up going B" and her second tactic "go A, but actually go A" . Little tougher in the second half, but EG still takes it 13-9.
Luckily for SEN they will have another chance in the next qualifier, but it's back to the drawing board for them. EG 2-0, worst case scenario EG 2-1 if SEN steal a lucky overtime win.
#RunEGaming
jjsjs nice analysis
NSG_Observer_2 [#1]Ez 4 eg
Potter might manage to get above 10 kills across both maps
16 kills pretty close lmfaooo -potter +a random gold player
Apollyonic [#102]If u have ever watched Sentinels play, u know they are the kings of throwing leads. It happens 90% of the time. I have given up ever judging them purely by score.
lmaooo they play too much
raka_gg [#110]As an honest sentinels fan, I believe that I can speak on behalf of our entire fanbase when I say that we should have lost today! EG was clearly tactically superior and we only won because of the good starts to 2nd halves of both maps. Thankfully Tenz is just superior and was able to carry us all the way. After seeing this match, I think acquiring potter as an IGL should be our priority, so shazam could focus on awping and zombs or dapr should be removed from the roster.
Lol. you put a lot of effort into your bait comments, respect.
cerise [#117]seeing all the ez for eg comments is so funny after the sen 2-0
y'all rlly had that much confidence that a team that didn't make it past round of 64 last challengers would sweep the world champs?
I'm pretty sure 98 percent of them were trolling lol
hkim [#118]I'm pretty sure 98 percent of them were trolling lol
This.. Can't believe SEN fans think it's unironic. Well there's maybe 1 or 2 people who were unironic in their support for EG.
cerise [#117]seeing all the ez for eg comments is so funny after the sen 2-0
y'all rlly had that much confidence that a team that didn't make it past round of 64 last challengers would sweep the world champs?
What do you mean EG won
hkim [#118]I'm pretty sure 98 percent of them were trolling lol
i know lol, but there's people who were being entirely serious and it's hilarious
ArgieGR8ArgieB8ArgieM8 [#119]This.. Can't believe SEN fans think it's unironic. Well there's maybe 1 or 2 people who were unironic in their support for EG.
that's exactly my point bro- im not talking abt the ppl saying it ironically. i'm talking abt the ppl that were being serious and comparing EG (and now soniqs) to BBG and saying they'd upset again.
cerise [#123]that's exactly my point bro- im not talking abt the ppl saying it ironically. i'm talking abt the ppl that were being serious and comparing EG (and now soniqs) to BBG and saying they'd upset again.
Literally no one actually thought eg was gonna win lmaooo, the fact they got 10 rounds on the first map is kinda embarrassing for sentinels though, eg is like t3
McLumberjack [#126]Literally no one actually thought eg was gonna win lmaooo, the fact they got 10 rounds on the first map is kinda embarrassing for sentinels though, eg is like t3
idk man i spent like 5 minutes reading comments before saying anything and some ppl seemed pretty serious to me- as for the 10 round thing, it was bound to happen. it's basically SEN's thing to have a heavy lead and almost toss.