o no sudden death match then
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.23 1.28 1.18 | 194 212 178 | 15 7 8 | / 13 7 6 / | 12 6 6 | +2 0 +2 | 74% 73% 75% | 144 153 136 | 16% 15% 18% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.16 0.89 1.40 | 181 159 201 | 14 6 8 | / 13 8 5 / | 17 3 14 | +1 -2 +3 | 78% 64% 92% | 107 94 120 | 30% 50% 20% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.05 0.53 1.52 | 248 137 351 | 23 6 17 | / 16 9 7 / | 4 2 2 | +7 -3 +10 | 78% 55% 100% | 163 101 220 | 32% 29% 33% | 6 0 6 | 7 6 1 | -1 -6 +5 | |
|
0.92 1.16 0.71 | 183 230 140 | 16 10 6 | / 17 8 9 / | 15 7 8 | -1 +2 -3 | 74% 82% 67% | 111 134 90 | 24% 26% 21% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.89 0.63 1.14 | 153 85 216 | 14 4 10 | / 15 8 7 / | 1 1 0 | -1 -4 +3 | 57% 45% 67% | 97 55 136 | 24% 20% 24% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.16 1.27 1.03 | 194 258 125 | 18 12 6 | / 16 11 5 / | 11 4 7 | +2 +1 +1 | 70% 67% 73% | 116 163 66 | 31% 32% 27% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.12 1.13 1.10 | 223 221 226 | 16 8 8 | / 15 9 6 / | 4 2 2 | +1 -1 +2 | 65% 58% 73% | 145 150 139 | 15% 19% 11% | 2 1 1 | 2 0 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.06 0.90 1.23 | 205 131 287 | 15 5 10 | / 17 8 9 / | 6 4 2 | -2 -3 +1 | 70% 58% 82% | 132 88 181 | 31% 25% 35% | 4 0 4 | 2 2 0 | +2 -2 +4 | |
|
0.92 0.37 1.51 | 216 132 308 | 17 4 13 | / 19 12 7 / | 4 3 1 | -2 -8 +6 | 65% 58% 73% | 132 91 177 | 22% 25% 20% | 4 1 3 | 4 4 0 | 0 -3 +3 | |
|
0.65 0.68 0.62 | 106 118 95 | 8 5 3 | / 15 9 6 / | 10 5 5 | -7 -4 -3 | 74% 75% 73% | 65 69 61 | 25% 31% 20% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.15 1.21 1.18 | 209 211 210 | 51 25 26 | / 45 22 23 / | 38 14 24 | +6 +3 +3 | 76% 77% 76% | 143 138 148 | 21% 22% 20% | 7 3 4 | 3 3 0 | +4 0 +4 | |
|
1.23 1.08 1.16 | 208 228 184 | 52 29 23 | / 44 22 22 / | 37 15 22 | +8 +7 +1 | 76% 69% 84% | 120 134 106 | 23% 22% 23% | 2 2 0 | 3 2 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.04 1.13 1.09 | 205 187 224 | 53 24 29 | / 48 22 26 / | 17 9 8 | +5 +2 +3 | 65% 63% 68% | 137 126 148 | 17% 13% 19% | 5 0 5 | 6 4 2 | -1 -4 +3 | |
|
1.09 0.91 0.99 | 229 244 218 | 60 30 30 | / 52 25 27 / | 14 7 7 | +8 +5 +3 | 75% 69% 81% | 150 156 144 | 22% 22% 22% | 11 3 8 | 18 10 8 | -7 -7 0 | |
|
0.71 0.84 0.78 | 152 143 160 | 41 19 22 | / 52 26 26 / | 24 14 10 | -11 -7 -4 | 74% 74% 73% | 92 84 100 | 26% 30% 24% | 9 4 5 | 8 4 4 | +1 0 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.21 1.09 1.15 | 215 243 190 | 57 34 23 | / 49 27 22 / | 29 13 16 | +8 +7 +1 | 68% 73% 63% | 137 153 120 | 29% 29% 29% | 4 3 1 | 4 3 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.87 1.13 1.00 | 225 208 246 | 56 27 29 | / 56 29 27 / | 13 6 7 | 0 -2 +2 | 69% 65% 74% | 145 137 153 | 20% 24% 16% | 13 4 9 | 12 10 2 | +1 -6 +7 | |
|
1.15 0.84 1.00 | 215 230 200 | 50 28 22 | / 53 29 24 / | 16 7 9 | -3 -1 -2 | 68% 70% 66% | 147 158 136 | 21% 25% 16% | 10 5 5 | 7 2 5 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
0.90 0.85 0.88 | 174 152 198 | 43 19 24 | / 51 24 27 / | 20 14 6 | -8 -5 -3 | 75% 73% 77% | 109 97 121 | 24% 23% 24% | 9 3 6 | 8 5 3 | +1 -2 +3 | |
|
0.87 0.85 0.86 | 141 132 154 | 35 17 18 | / 48 25 23 / | 38 16 22 | -13 -8 -5 | 74% 76% 71% | 95 94 96 | 22% 36% 12% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.39 1.20 1.58 | 247 229 265 | 21 10 11 | / 15 8 7 / | 9 1 8 | +6 +2 +4 | 69% 69% 69% | 172 155 189 | 28% 26% 29% | 5 2 3 | 2 2 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
1.19 1.46 0.92 | 241 253 230 | 21 12 9 | / 19 7 12 / | 11 5 6 | +2 +5 -3 | 69% 77% 62% | 153 158 148 | 15% 14% 16% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
1.05 1.72 0.38 | 252 407 98 | 22 18 4 | / 19 9 10 / | 2 0 2 | +3 +9 -6 | 69% 69% 69% | 161 249 73 | 24% 30% 11% | 3 3 0 | 7 2 5 | -4 +1 -5 | |
|
0.73 0.60 0.87 | 139 115 164 | 13 5 8 | / 19 10 9 / | 8 7 1 | -6 -5 -1 | 77% 77% 77% | 84 65 103 | 31% 33% 30% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.63 0.41 0.85 | 117 93 142 | 11 4 7 | / 18 10 8 / | 3 2 1 | -7 -6 -1 | 65% 54% 77% | 70 59 82 | 44% 45% 43% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.43 1.36 1.51 | 242 213 272 | 21 9 12 | / 14 6 8 / | 14 7 7 | +7 +3 +4 | 77% 85% 69% | 159 139 179 | 30% 24% 36% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.99 0.92 1.06 | 162 119 206 | 14 5 9 | / 17 7 10 / | 16 5 11 | -3 -2 -1 | 77% 77% 77% | 105 90 120 | 14% 33% 5% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.94 1.09 0.80 | 233 259 208 | 21 13 8 | / 20 9 11 / | 2 0 2 | +1 +4 -3 | 65% 62% 69% | 149 157 141 | 25% 26% 25% | 6 3 3 | 4 3 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.92 0.94 0.91 | 210 215 206 | 19 10 9 | / 20 11 9 / | 7 3 4 | -1 -1 0 | 73% 85% 62% | 142 138 146 | 22% 28% 16% | 4 3 1 | 5 2 3 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.85 1.19 0.51 | 158 190 127 | 15 9 6 | / 17 6 11 / | 7 6 1 | -2 +3 -5 | 77% 92% 62% | 97 116 78 | 29% 23% 38% | 3 2 1 | 2 0 2 | +1 +2 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.75 2.55 1.02 | 327 454 210 | 27 19 8 | / 13 4 9 / | 17 10 7 | +14 +15 -1 | 87% 91% 83% | 188 263 119 | 13% 11% 15% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.16 0.97 1.34 | 220 212 228 | 18 8 10 | / 14 7 7 / | 5 3 2 | +4 +1 +3 | 70% 64% 75% | 159 158 160 | 14% 11% 17% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
0.91 0.97 0.85 | 186 190 183 | 15 8 7 | / 17 7 10 / | 17 7 10 | -2 +1 -3 | 87% 91% 83% | 109 101 117 | 19% 32% 13% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.88 0.90 0.87 | 187 157 215 | 15 6 9 | / 17 7 10 / | 8 5 3 | -2 -1 -1 | 78% 82% 75% | 125 100 147 | 12% 7% 17% | 2 0 2 | 4 2 2 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.68 0.40 0.94 | 134 88 177 | 12 4 8 | / 16 8 8 / | 1 0 1 | -4 -4 0 | 70% 64% 75% | 82 58 105 | 25% 38% 19% | 5 2 3 | 6 4 2 | -1 -2 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.14 1.12 1.15 | 227 227 228 | 18 10 8 | / 17 8 9 / | 7 3 4 | +1 +2 -1 | 78% 75% 82% | 153 161 145 | 14% 22% 8% | 3 0 3 | 4 3 1 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
0.97 1.40 0.51 | 213 256 166 | 15 10 5 | / 18 9 9 / | 5 2 3 | -3 +1 -4 | 65% 67% 64% | 156 188 121 | 27% 31% 23% | 4 1 3 | 0 0 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
0.92 1.00 0.83 | 155 160 150 | 13 7 6 | / 16 9 7 / | 12 6 6 | -3 -2 -1 | 70% 75% 64% | 114 125 102 | 33% 44% 24% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.84 1.01 0.66 | 210 260 157 | 18 13 5 | / 19 10 9 / | 4 2 2 | -1 +3 -4 | 57% 67% 45% | 133 160 103 | 26% 31% 20% | 2 2 0 | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.73 0.60 0.87 | 160 132 192 | 13 5 8 | / 17 10 7 / | 7 4 3 | -4 -5 +1 | 78% 67% 91% | 100 88 113 | 15% 21% 12% | 2 1 1 | 4 3 1 | -2 -2 0 |
Two of my favourite teams, but only one can make it.
T1 has players I’ve been following since they’ve been in OWL and are genuinely good in both games + I’ve been a huge fan of the T1 org since 2020 (yes when they had brax, azk, curry, steel, autimatic, ska, Spyder). While ZETA are the only Japanese squad in the league, have players that have been staples in the Japanese scene and can go toe-to-toe against the world’s best.
I don’t mind who makes it out of here, but i want ZETA to qualify.
T1 and ZETA are about to engage in an intense Best-of-3 Valorant match. This high-stakes encounter will determine the victor based on which team secures victories on two out of the three selected maps.
The first map in the rotation is Haven, known for its three bombsites and multiple strategic options. As the game begins, T1 and ZETA take their positions, ready to unleash their full potential. The initial rounds showcase both teams' meticulous preparation and solid execution. T1's strategies appear slightly more refined, allowing them to gain an early advantage. Their coordinated pushes and intelligent use of utility grant them crucial round wins, leading to a solid first-half performance. With a score of 9-3, T1 establishes a commanding lead.
However, ZETA is not one to back down easily. They rally their forces and adjust their tactics during the halftime break. The second half witnesses a resurgent ZETA, showing tremendous resilience and determination. Their defenders hold strong positions, denying T1 any easy access to the bombsites. ZETA's attackers exhibit impeccable coordination, executing flawless executes and catching T1 off guard. With a series of successful retakes and clutch plays, ZETA stages an impressive comeback, narrowing the score gap. The match becomes a nail-biting affair, as both teams battle fiercely to secure the crucial rounds needed for victory. However, T1's experience and composure prove vital in the face of ZETA's onslaught. They manage to secure the necessary rounds and ultimately emerge as the winners of Haven, with a final score of 13-11.
As the teams prepare for the second map, Split, the atmosphere becomes even more electric. Split, with its verticality and tight corridors, demands precise execution and effective teamwork. The early rounds showcase intense duels and calculated plays from both sides. T1's defenders hold their ground with impressive crossfires and quick rotations, thwarting ZETA's advances. ZETA, however, is relentless in their pursuit of victory. Their attackers strategize meticulously, exploiting the map's intricacies to gain advantages. ZETA's agents synergize flawlessly, setting up devastating executes and successfully planting the spike. Yet, T1 remains resilient, responding with sharp aim and clutch plays when it matters the most. With a combination of individual skill and coordinated teamwork, T1 secures crucial rounds, pushing the score in their favor. Despite ZETA's valiant efforts, T1 emerges triumphant on Split, concluding the map with a score of 13-9.
With two maps already decided, the tension intensifies as both teams head into the final map, Ascent. This decider map will determine the ultimate victor of the match. The momentum swings back and forth as T1 and ZETA engage in a battle of wits and skills. The rounds unfold with intense firefights, strategic plays, and calculated rotations. T1's attackers showcase precise execution and well-coordinated strategies, gaining the upper hand in crucial situations. ZETA's defenders display exceptional map control and effective utility usage, making it difficult for T1 to break through their defense. The match reaches its climax as both teams stand on the precipice of victory. In a thrilling exchange of blows, T1 manages to secure the final rounds needed to claim victory on Ascent, concluding the map with a score of 13-11.