ItsHunter [#38]
a bad game doesnt dictate a teams skill, this is what i cant stand about valo tards its almost like yall have only ever interacted with valorant esports and think youre a scholar on the subject.
There are so many variables that you have to take into account, a team cant be 100% every game and sometimes they even fall to less than 50% of their typical level but that doesnt mean theyre a bad team, they just need to bounce back.
Lev wouldve put up a really good fight against Navi had they been playing the way they did in their match against Zeta. Zeta didnt even look bad as well, Lev were just that much better
... you mean the thing I said at the bottom of my first reply with that this tourney isnt good for determining definitive ranking and that its subjective?
yes im aware of that and proceeded under the assumption that you had the reading comprehension to take my stance on that into account reading my following reply
you see the problem is the exact same thing you gave lev could be applied to other teams too. "Giants should have rolled NRG if they had outplayed nrg like they did Detonation, just a bad game, clearly they are better" - its just a pointless argument.
This tournament Lev were not a top tier team for their region; whether it was them underperforming, or whatever tf factor it was (we quite simply dont know), they didn't preform like Loud did.
But yes, technically the only team we know for certain that was good is fnatic, every other team is a question mark to some extend since it was single elim