Title
Nah they're not fine. You're extrapolating that EDG are better than a bunch of teams that they will NEVER play until Tokyo, based off their performance Vs 100T. Anyone who actually watches Val knows that's never an accurate way to rate teams. It never had been and never will. Only actual results matter.
People assess and speculate about teams and how they would do against other teams they haven't played yet all the time. The idea that there's something wrong with that is moronic. It's literally what all the analysts are doing when they're setting expectations going into these tournaments. Could it be wrong? Sure, but that doesn't mean we throw up our hands in the air and choose to not think about it.
Yeah people can do that if they want. Doesn't mean they're right. So if someone jumps out the window and says a team with ZERO Lan wins can beat 90% of a region with more exp, based on one game, I'm gonna call it stupid.
Ask yourself how that makes sense. EDG aren't better than 90% of teams from ANY of the leagues. That shouldn't be a hottake to anyone with common sense and critical thinking.
I can't believe people are arguing, yall are the only copers, literally all of EMEA apart from Navi and probably FNC have disappointed in this event.
The fact that only KC probably one of the bottom 15 teams in this tourney were the ones that made the second round just shows how much of a disappointment EMEA are.
The others had harder matches but they should not have lost in the fashion they all did.
top EMEA is, and will always be better than top NA
plus you had 5 teams and now you have 1 team
while we have 4 while having 10 in total
so we are statisticly better go get your copium somewhere else you braindead brainwhashed delusional NA fan, i think you guys have more excuses than people in your region