Xerxia 2-1 FPX
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.12 1.06 1.19 | 215 190 241 | 20 9 11 | / 18 11 7 / | 10 5 5 | +2 -2 +4 | 77% 77% 77% | 135 118 152 | 24% 19% 27% | 2 0 2 | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.12 1.30 0.95 | 214 256 173 | 19 12 7 | / 15 7 8 / | 7 1 6 | +4 +5 -1 | 81% 92% 69% | 130 158 102 | 38% 46% 29% | 3 1 2 | 2 0 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.06 1.19 0.94 | 222 274 170 | 20 14 6 | / 18 8 10 / | 3 1 2 | +2 +6 -4 | 62% 69% 54% | 141 169 112 | 40% 54% 23% | 4 3 1 | 3 3 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.95 0.69 1.20 | 201 187 217 | 18 8 10 | / 19 11 8 / | 5 2 3 | -1 -3 +2 | 73% 62% 85% | 129 113 145 | 33% 38% 30% | 3 2 1 | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.91 0.73 1.08 | 170 144 198 | 15 7 8 | / 17 8 9 / | 10 3 7 | -2 -1 -1 | 65% 62% 69% | 123 99 147 | 36% 47% 29% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.13 1.28 0.97 | 216 227 205 | 19 10 9 | / 15 7 8 / | 7 1 6 | +4 +3 +1 | 77% 69% 85% | 141 146 135 | 18% 27% 9% | 0 0 0 | 3 0 3 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
0.93 1.09 0.76 | 166 194 139 | 17 9 8 | / 18 8 10 / | 10 7 3 | -1 +1 -2 | 73% 77% 69% | 107 118 96 | 24% 19% 31% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.90 0.49 1.31 | 214 138 290 | 20 7 13 | / 20 10 10 / | 4 2 2 | 0 -3 +3 | 69% 69% 69% | 146 112 179 | 29% 50% 12% | 5 1 4 | 2 2 0 | +3 -1 +4 | |
|
0.90 0.82 0.99 | 203 198 208 | 17 8 9 | / 21 11 10 / | 6 3 3 | -4 -3 -1 | 77% 85% 69% | 144 139 148 | 18% 15% 20% | 3 1 2 | 3 3 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
0.88 1.08 0.67 | 179 199 161 | 14 9 5 | / 18 8 10 / | 5 2 3 | -4 +1 -5 | 69% 62% 77% | 132 145 119 | 31% 43% 21% | 4 3 1 | 5 2 3 | -1 +1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.16 1.35 1.26 | 239 211 266 | 60 26 34 | / 46 26 20 / | 19 9 10 | +14 0 +14 | 73% 64% 83% | 155 141 170 | 22% 20% 23% | 8 1 7 | 5 1 4 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
1.25 0.79 1.03 | 183 230 138 | 46 30 16 | / 42 21 21 / | 13 4 9 | +4 +9 -5 | 66% 69% 63% | 113 141 83 | 41% 42% 38% | 6 2 4 | 8 2 6 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.72 1.21 0.96 | 213 182 247 | 56 24 32 | / 53 29 24 / | 11 6 5 | +3 -5 +8 | 66% 58% 74% | 141 117 166 | 33% 35% 31% | 6 4 2 | 12 7 5 | -6 -3 -3 | |
|
0.81 1.07 0.94 | 180 160 201 | 43 20 23 | / 48 26 22 / | 23 8 15 | -5 -6 +1 | 72% 67% 77% | 126 106 145 | 38% 37% 39% | 4 2 2 | 3 3 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.75 0.88 0.82 | 194 195 197 | 46 24 22 | / 57 30 27 / | 16 8 8 | -11 -6 -5 | 62% 61% 63% | 127 130 123 | 27% 32% 21% | 10 6 4 | 9 8 1 | +1 -2 +3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.82 1.46 1.14 | 262 204 314 | 62 24 38 | / 53 28 25 / | 12 7 5 | +9 -4 +13 | 72% 66% 78% | 168 140 196 | 29% 35% 23% | 18 7 11 | 6 5 1 | +12 +2 +10 | |
|
1.26 0.96 1.11 | 217 232 203 | 53 30 23 | / 46 22 24 / | 18 3 15 | +7 +8 -1 | 72% 74% 69% | 133 139 127 | 20% 27% 15% | 6 3 3 | 9 3 6 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
1.01 0.83 0.92 | 177 207 149 | 44 27 17 | / 46 24 22 / | 14 5 9 | -2 +3 -5 | 73% 69% 78% | 123 138 109 | 30% 33% 27% | 6 4 2 | 7 3 4 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.87 0.86 0.87 | 166 161 170 | 43 21 22 | / 53 26 27 / | 28 14 14 | -10 -5 -5 | 69% 71% 67% | 108 95 120 | 20% 16% 24% | 3 1 2 | 7 3 4 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.64 1.08 0.86 | 183 145 223 | 44 14 30 | / 53 29 24 / | 15 11 4 | -9 -15 +6 | 69% 71% 67% | 132 110 153 | 17% 14% 20% | 4 1 3 | 5 5 0 | -1 -4 +3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.16 1.24 1.07 | 226 246 202 | 18 10 8 | / 15 8 7 / | 3 1 2 | +3 +2 +1 | 68% 50% 90% | 155 164 145 | 22% 22% 23% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.91 0.78 1.07 | 167 159 177 | 13 7 6 | / 14 8 6 / | 3 1 2 | -1 -1 0 | 55% 42% 70% | 102 99 106 | 37% 31% 45% | 3 1 2 | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.79 0.87 0.70 | 171 205 133 | 12 8 4 | / 17 11 6 / | 3 1 2 | -5 -3 -2 | 68% 58% 80% | 114 133 91 | 42% 36% 50% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.70 0.66 0.76 | 160 133 193 | 14 7 7 | / 18 9 9 / | 4 3 1 | -4 -2 -2 | 59% 67% 50% | 119 96 146 | 33% 31% 35% | 0 0 0 | 4 2 2 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.58 0.37 0.82 | 159 137 187 | 12 5 7 | / 19 12 7 / | 4 3 1 | -7 -7 0 | 55% 50% 60% | 103 89 120 | 35% 38% 33% | 4 2 2 | 1 1 0 | +3 +1 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.37 1.71 1.08 | 311 363 269 | 23 12 11 | / 15 6 9 / | 3 2 1 | +8 +6 +2 | 73% 70% 75% | 189 220 164 | 36% 37% 35% | 7 4 3 | 2 1 1 | +5 +3 +2 | |
|
1.22 1.40 1.06 | 188 234 151 | 17 10 7 | / 11 5 6 / | 5 2 3 | +6 +5 +1 | 82% 80% 83% | 123 140 110 | 22% 15% 30% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.14 1.14 1.14 | 202 195 208 | 15 8 7 | / 12 5 7 / | 6 1 5 | +3 +3 0 | 68% 80% 58% | 121 111 130 | 23% 14% 32% | 1 0 1 | 4 2 2 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
1.09 0.71 1.41 | 211 113 294 | 14 3 11 | / 17 8 9 / | 12 6 6 | -3 -5 +2 | 77% 80% 75% | 153 83 211 | 23% 11% 29% | 2 0 2 | 4 1 3 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.99 0.54 1.37 | 185 102 255 | 14 2 12 | / 14 8 6 / | 5 5 0 | 0 -6 +6 | 68% 70% 67% | 144 94 185 | 21% 18% 22% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.49 1.20 1.76 | 275 199 346 | 22 7 15 | / 13 7 6 / | 6 3 3 | +9 0 +9 | 74% 64% 83% | 177 142 209 | 18% 17% 19% | 3 0 3 | 1 0 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.23 0.82 1.61 | 279 230 324 | 24 9 15 | / 16 9 7 / | 2 1 1 | +8 0 +8 | 65% 45% 83% | 175 143 205 | 31% 35% 29% | 3 2 1 | 5 3 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
1.12 0.82 1.38 | 198 129 262 | 16 5 11 | / 14 7 7 / | 10 4 6 | +2 -2 +4 | 83% 82% 83% | 140 87 189 | 38% 23% 46% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.03 1.73 0.40 | 167 278 67 | 14 11 3 | / 13 6 7 / | 3 2 1 | +1 +5 -4 | 61% 73% 50% | 103 167 45 | 50% 47% 60% | 0 0 0 | 3 0 3 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
0.76 0.65 0.87 | 200 164 234 | 14 5 9 | / 20 10 10 / | 9 4 5 | -6 -5 -1 | 70% 64% 75% | 133 129 137 | 12% 10% 13% | 2 1 1 | 5 4 1 | -3 -3 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.21 0.43 2.06 | 261 142 392 | 19 5 14 | / 18 12 6 / | 5 3 2 | +1 -7 +8 | 74% 58% 91% | 174 105 250 | 22% 24% 21% | 6 2 4 | 2 2 0 | +4 0 +4 | |
|
1.06 1.33 0.77 | 232 268 194 | 19 12 7 | / 19 10 9 / | 5 1 4 | 0 +2 -2 | 70% 75% 64% | 135 155 114 | 21% 36% 9% | 5 3 2 | 2 1 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
0.68 0.52 0.86 | 162 124 206 | 13 4 9 | / 18 10 8 / | 4 3 1 | -5 -6 +1 | 61% 58% 64% | 108 93 123 | 13% 7% 19% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.68 0.61 0.75 | 164 195 131 | 13 8 5 | / 17 11 6 / | 4 1 3 | -4 -3 -1 | 70% 67% 73% | 113 128 98 | 39% 44% 33% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.59 0.77 0.40 | 121 167 72 | 12 9 3 | / 18 10 8 / | 6 1 5 | -6 -1 -5 | 57% 58% 55% | 66 81 49 | 13% 17% 6% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 |
p1lot [#21]EZ game for my kid ANGE1 with 50+ frags
he couldnt put up 50 in EMEA, def not gonna do it against major regions like APAC
number1_100T_fan [#30]FPX 2-0 XERXIA (no sub)
XERXIA 2-1 FPX (sub)
FPX subs are really weak.
Seider
Masked
Kereme
MitiYa [#41]Overrated Team ( XIA ) VS ( FPX ) Underrated Team
Lets Goo
Bruh who overrates xerxia 💀💀💀💀
delusional_TH [#38]If XERXIA win
EMEA : nahh FPX played with sub, XERXIA flukeIf XERXIA lost
EMEA : kewkkk FPX not even full power
But it is true. 3 of the players might not make it to Copenhagen
FlyingDoggoWoweeClap2 [#17]FPX FANS FUCKING DELUSIONAL LMAO I FUCKING LOVE IT
XIA 2-0 FPX NOT EVEN CLOSE
did u get banned or sth
archetype [#56]did u get banned or sth
nope just forgot my password and email
making this acc just for COPIUMhagen and go back touch grass
delusional_TH [#38]If XERXIA win
EMEA : nahh FPX played with sub, XERXIA flukeIf XERXIA lost
EMEA : kewkkk FPX not even full power
would like to see how xerxia would do with subs
no_noise_979 [#62]would like to see how xerxia would do with subs
i mean if its thai subs and we could get like full sense, fw or mith i think we would stand a chance...
mori-xoxu [#70]i mean if its thai subs and we could get like full sense, fw or mith i think we would stand a chance...
cant be from top team in your region tho, thatd be like fpx getting a sub from liquid, acend or navi
just stop acting like fpx gonna be able to play to their real potential because of course they arent
MitiYa [#41]Overrated Team ( XIA ) VS ( FPX ) Underrated Team
Lets Goo
why are you all so mad ? thats fact, FPX first time entering Master thats why i say Underrated, but xia(ex x10) has been to master 2-3 times
thatpower [#69]xerxia 2-0 fpx with subs won’t be good
Just about to say, with Suygetsu and Shao unlikely to join the team in Masters FPX chance is slim
no_noise_979 [#62]would like to see how xerxia would do with subs
don't be mad bro im just joking :) I personally really want FPX full roster to be able to come to master
MitiYa [#72]why are you all so mad ? thats fact, FPX first time entering Master thats why i say Underrated, but xia(ex x10) has been to master 2-3 times
So you mean the more a team enters masters the more they are overrated? 💀💀💀💀 Learn to understand the definition of English words first before using the word "overrated" xd
ntnoob [#2]2-0 incoming for fpx
13-0
13-0ANGE1 mvp
I’ve just saw angel in Kiev in park close to his house. I was a day after a final. And I said him I will bet on them , he answered that he will destroy everything
babysasuke [#23]he couldnt put up 50 in EMEA, def not gonna do it against major regions like APAC
yep apac players are for sure better then EMEA who won champions and masters yap
SuckUrMumBruv3 [#90]yep apac players are for sure better then EMEA who won champions and masters yap
power rankings (disregarding the past achievements)
APAC_jimmy [#19]Xerxia will expose this overrated team
the full team literally made it to emea finals twice, and with subs you can't call them overrated
Luck_ [#91]although fpx are missing half of their roster, xerxia are looking very bad rn, i think fpx 2-1
I think we qual to masters dude, like boom the 3rd best asian team, we smashed them in scrims, not smashed them like we beat them and then their excuse is that they were lagging or some shit and they stopped the scrim.
MomGoSky [#94]I think we qual to masters dude, like boom the 3rd best asian team, we smashed them in scrims, not smashed them like we beat them and then their excuse is that they were lagging or some shit and they stopped the scrim.
bro thinks hes on the team 💀💀💀💀💀💀
TheHowling03 [#101]Do we know yet if FPX has there full roster?
It seems like 4 players - Ardiis, Ange1, Zyppan, Shao and substitute for Suygetsu
DarkS1DE [#102]It seems like 4 players - Ardiis, Ange1, Zyppan, Shao and substitute for Suygetsu
really wished suygetsu would have been there, this could have been there tournament
ckotzer [#113]the fact that there is no suygetsu does not mean that xia will win, since the level of xia is much lower than fpx
cope xerxia 2-0
ckotzer [#113]the fact that there is no suygetsu does not mean that xia will win, since the level of xia is much lower than fpx
flag checks out, but nt god sscary gonna punish them
MitiYa [#117]This is The World I Love, When Someone Says FPX Overrated, But No One Votes Down Him, When I Say XIA Overrated Everyone Gets Angry + Vote Down Me, AMAZING World, I Love This World
Little boy is sad cuz others don't like ur opinion, little boy really cares about the likes so I'll give u one more down vote xD
annoybrocc02 [#103]really wished suygetsu would have been there, this could have been there tournament
So from what i understand there is still a chance he makes it if FPX get out of the group stage. Thats a big if though.
addicted_to_trouble [#124]Anyone betting on this and can give some input?
ez money on xerxia bro trust
addicted_to_trouble [#124]Anyone betting on this and can give some input?
over 2.5 unless fpx pick breeze, rest depend on the veto
addicted_to_trouble [#124]Anyone betting on this and can give some input?
Surf will smurf so 2-0 XIA
ScorpionHanzou [#143]I've got doubt about Ange1 leaving Ukraine. Aren't all Ukrainian men banned from leaving Ukraine?
he is currently already in copenhagen, so you dont need to worry about whether or not he can go! only one of the team cannot at the moment due to visa, suygetsu (russian)
hardstuckimmortal [#148]they really made roster changes ??
because they have a mixed roaster, so one of the Russian player couldn't get his visa, but I think he might come for the playoffs if they qualify
acels1 [#144]no idea who tf seider is, but it should be quick 2-0 for fpx
Seider is a banger player, 200+ ACS with almost every agent he plays in almost every match he plays. He won't be a trouble for FPX
mori-xoxu [#145]he is currently already in copenhagen, so you dont need to worry about whether or not he can go! only one of the team cannot at the moment due to visa, suygetsu (russian)
ok
MourninggStarr [#160]FPX will pull a Masters 1 FNATIC, they will not make it to playoffs because of sub issue. XERXIA and DRX goes to playoffs. GG
Situations are different
For Fnatic, Derke was the carry, without him they sucked and couldn't do anything all over the map, we saw it against M3C, against FPX, against G2
For FPX, Suygetsu is a bad loss, but every FPX player is strong and can pop off at any time
I.e. old Fnatic were hurt 3x more by losing Derke than FPX will be hurt by losing Suygetsu
Olofboost [#161]Situations are different
For Fnatic, Derke was the carry, without him they sucked and couldn't do anything all over the map, we saw it against M3C, against FPX, against G2
For FPX, Suygetsu is a bad loss, but every FPX player is strong and can pop off at any time
I.e. old Fnatic were hurt 3x more by losing Derke than FPX will be hurt by losing Suygetsu
Also fnc at that time didn't have a chamber player which was op at that time.
redlight [#10]FPX 2-1 (if with full roster)
XIA 2-0 (if FPX has 3 subs)
FPX 2-0 and wouldn't be close (if with full roster)
2-1 either way (if FPX has subs)
Anzaldinho [#164]Xerxia can win if surf shows up,otherwise FPX.Surf for some reason always drops the ball/chokes/panics on international LANs,sure he was good enough in APAC but if he shows up and does some crucial impact plays/entries like pati used to do then xerxia will evidently win
iceland was his first international LAN, no? X10/Xerxia duelist was Patiphan last year
Anzaldinho [#164]Xerxia can win if surf shows up,otherwise FPX.Surf for some reason always drops the ball/chokes/panics on international LANs,sure he was good enough in APAC but if he shows up and does some crucial impact plays/entries like pati used to do then xerxia will evidently win
Bro when xset playing im so confused
Anzaldinho [#164]Xerxia can win if surf shows up,otherwise FPX.Surf for some reason always drops the ball/chokes/panics on international LANs,sure he was good enough in APAC but if he shows up and does some crucial impact plays/entries like pati used to do then xerxia will evidently win
he wasn't even play bad in Iceland...
TheSpec7re [#154]Seider is a banger player, 200+ ACS with almost every agent he plays in almost every match he plays. He won't be a trouble for FPX
Yes and cant win a single series with lower league 🤣
Hyempanada [#170]Yes and cant win a single series with lower league 🤣
it's a team diff bro, he personally is a good player
r1ckhey [#176]Were FPX comming in russian with suygetsu in the roster?
Suygetsu couldn't get his visa so they're playing with a sub but he manages to get it before playoffs then he'll come back
TheSpec7re [#178]Suygetsu couldn't get his visa so they're playing with a sub but he manages to get it before playoffs then he'll come back
I meant communicating
KoreanOverlord [#188]After watching this map 1 I am getting increasingly confident fpx would get 2-0d by drx if they win
name + flag
XqcAbdul [#191]name + flag
Or maybe use those neural connectors and watch how mediocre both teams are playing
Theres a reason why PRX 3-0d XIA with ease
KoreanOverlord [#188]After watching this map 1 I am getting increasingly confident fpx would get 2-0d by drx if they win
Yeah bro DRX will win this event for sure! Not like people said same thing every time about previous events, not like DRX always disappointed!
Olofboost [#202]Yeah bro DRX will win this event for sure! Not like people said same thing every time about previous events, not like DRX always disappointed!
DRX will 2-0 FPX/XIA whether u like it or not
addicted_to_trouble [#124]Anyone betting on this and can give some input?
Fpx managed to ban both icebox and breeze so fpx 2-0*
Hyempanada [#212]Game 1 is so heartbreaking 😭 lose 3 eco? And losing a 2v4 and they retake so long 😩
+foxz threw the last round no one would push that especially you have info and alone :/
Azzlack [#194]Literally using operator and setup plays against a team with a sub???? so fucking cringe. Imagine u need to operator abuse vs a team with a sub (5v4)
op abusers at all cringe and bad at the game
Kibitz [#230]haven is chamber map lets see if Surf can keep his chamber up like before or not
Nah bro, he will pick jett fosho
Daniveus [#257]Surf destroyed them
he tried hard to carry them on all 3 maps. but it was so close, a few aim duels here and there.
MitiYa [#255]XIABOT So Much Throw, Dont hate me little kids LOL
cmon XIABOT FANS cmon vote down me to -100 votes
Defis [#261]GodPlusFenix exposed this overrated team
down vote upcoming to you bcs XIA fans mad LOL
FlyingDoggoWoweeClap2 [#17]FPX FANS FUCKING DELUSIONAL LMAO I FUCKING LOVE IT
XIA 2-0 FPX NOT EVEN CLOSE
Who is delusional now kekw
APAC_jimmy [#19]Xerxia will expose this overrated team
the only thing that got exposed is a one team region
Supahot666 [#266]เล่นโง่แบบนี้ก็แพ้ไปไอควายสมเพช
มีคนร้อนนนนเสียสองร้อวมาแช่งเขาแบบนี้ก็ไม่เอานะ
เขียร์ได้แต่ลงตังค์ให้ถูกด้วยไม่ใช่เสียมาแล้วแช่ง5555 สมเพช
Supahot666 [#266]เล่นโง่แบบนี้ก็แพ้ไปไอควายสมเพช
ขโมยตังค์พ่อแม่มาลงแล้วเสียชัวร์ มึงอ่ะที่น่าน่าสมเพช555555
LisiyNefor [#89]I’ve just saw angel in Kiev in park close to his house. I was a day after a final. And I said him I will bet on them , he answered that he will destroy everything
This aged perfectly
LisiyNefor [#89]I’ve just saw angel in Kiev in park close to his house. I was a day after a final. And I said him I will bet on them , he answered that he will destroy everything
so whether in vct now you bet on FPX again?