I said "which three" and "right now"

Remind me which three teams are in the upper semifinals right now?

Top 3 Americas is G2 MIBR KRÜ in some order, who said C9 was up there?

Working on it, gimme two weeks

He has trialed for NRG before (or at least has been rumoured to)

Yes (mostly) https://i.imgur.com/C0d6GVo.png

How do you consistently have some of the worst takes on this forum

Like 90% of this is wrong

Child labour laws

Done, good luck champ 🫡

Cya Clucker o7

I opened stream and it's just him breathing heavily

I skipped to a random point in the VOD and it's JessieVash whiffing an entire Vandal mag on an Outlaw with no ammo at close range

I love that Lmemore is back on a team but PLEASE let this go smoothly 😭

I'm using this flag because one of my best friends died. I'm the one who requested this flag be added to VLR, in fact

You can't just assume things like this

We're really saying "meme flags" now 💔

I don't care if he's fake flagging or trolling or whatever, this isn't justified.

I could be wrong but I think he's taking a mental break

All good lmao

She's a girl

Say it on your main. Oh wait, which one's your main again?

Doubling down only makes the bait worse in this case 0.5/8

Title too long + it's ChatGPT'd 1/8 nice try nihso

He did... questionable things to get them back

Should riot start scripting games to manufacture narratives?

No.

What's the point in putting a blank space between each individual tier? Isn't it redundant at that point?

He doesn't hide his face because he's ugly, what?

Not VALORANT, but Sandstorm somehow went from Geometry Dash (one of the first to verify Bloodbath) to Brawlhalla (arguably the best in the world for some time, popularized scythe and then greatsword)

This isn't actually the rule. I'm just demonstrating that if it were, nothing would change, and it therefore doesn't do any good to argue for it expecting a different outcome

Gonna assume this was prompted by the tie in Group Omega in Pacific.

Head-to-head between the four tied teams:

RRQ 2-1
TLN 2-1
T1 1-2
NS 1-2

That would put RRQ and TLN in a tie breaker for 1st place (RRQ wins), and T1 and NS in a tie breaker for 3rd place (T1 wins). This puts the order at RRQ, TLN, T1, and NS respectively.

TL;DR: Nothing changes.

😭

They can definitely try to ask for a reconsideration, but judging by the fact that Francis has already deleted his tweet, I think they've accepted the current outcome

6/10 pun btw

Yeah, this whole thing is definitely a huge misunderstanding, and the rules need to not only be rewritten for clarification, but also disclosed to teams in a way that's comprehensive.

Also, note: when it says "determines who advances," they mean which team advances past the tie breaker. Again, an instance of lack of clarity in wording

When going through a tie breaker, what we're trying to do isn't sort the teams, but rather decide a winner. So when we find a winner in RRQ between the four teams, there are now three teams who remain tied. That's when we move to a three-team tie breaker.

To clarify on the note, it's possible for a four-way tie breaker to break into two individual two-way tie breakers. For example, if TLN had the same map differential as RRQ, then they'd go into a tie breaker for 1st and 2nd, whilst T1 and NS would go into a separate tie breaker for 3rd and 4th.

Nope. I do have egg noodle soup from time to time, if that counts

This is a good way of putting it. Once you've won the tie breaker, it isn't necessary to participate in the ones that follow

Easier and/or more fair is always going to be subjective and rather opinionated. I'm not trying to argue for nor against... I'm just elaborating on why it is how it is

It's very, very simple.

There are four teams (RRQ, TLN, T1, NS), so we use the four-way tie breaker (map differential) to put RRQ in 1st.

Then there are three teams (TLN, T1, NS), so we use the three-way tie breaker (head-to-head) to put TLN in 2nd.

Then there are two teams (T1, NS), so we use the two-way tie breaker (head-to-head match score) to put T1 in 3rd and NS in 4th.

That's how these tie breakers work.

You're not looking at how many teams there are in the tie and then going down the respective list. You're trying to narrow down the number of teams in the tie by removing teams from it. We had 4 teams, so we narrowed it down to 3, and then to 2.

Maggi (I don't actually eat noodles I just had it one time as a kid)

May I help you?
We'll be asking the questions old man. Who are you?
Yu.
No, not me. You.
Yes, I'm Yu.
Just answer the damn question! Who are you?
I have told you!
Are you deaf?
No. Yu is blind.
I'm not blind. You blind.
That is what I just said.
That's what I'm asking you.
And Yu was answering.
Shut up! You!
Yes?
Not you. Him! What's your name?
Mi.
Yes, you.
I'm Mi.
He's Mi and I'm Yu.
And I'm about to whoop your old ass man because I am sick of playing games! You, me? Everybody's ass around here!

Has to be the 9 rounds from 3-11 to 12-11 at São Paulo, no?

This isn't even ragebait, it's just true

Indonesia casually winning both groups:

Case in point

I'd try to ragebait but you can't respond for another 8 minutes sooo

Who would nataNk replace? Because his roles overlap with sheydos and soulcas, who are two of KOI's better players

You'd have to play smokes I think but sure I'm all for it

Surely a team of Autumn SWERL pl1xx Maple +1 would make playoffs consistently

Does this mean you're not playing premier this week

Imagine making a roster change mid-Stage 1 and it's bringing in Governer

"KRÜ flag" 💔

Tough call. On one hand, GX won more than half a map per BO3 on average. On the other hand, APK didn't get 13-0'd by ANGE1. Definitely pretty 50-50

Since when did our goat Tacolilla care about what was meta