| Country: | Australia |
| Registered: | June 10, 2023 |
| Last post: | May 17, 2024 at 3:52 AM |
| Posts: | 6626 |
I do???
and edg legit clears trace??
trace are good but there is such a big tier gap between fpx+edg and the rest of CN.
edg and fpx clear every other team in china
S - Lev, Kru
A - 100T, Loud, C9
B - EG, G2, Sen
C - NRG
D - Mibr, furia
https://www.vlr.gg/search/threads/?q=sacy&index=titles&sort=replied
everytime sacy does bad there are hate threads.
https://www.vlr.gg/search/threads/?q=zekken&index=titles&sort=replied
same with zekken and legit every other sentinels member.
I am not saying there is no hate but I find almost every player apart from johnqt is getting similar levels of hate proportionate to their fans
idk if this is just an unconcious bias but I haven't seen any hate threads about sacy on vlr is quite some time. From memory he has the same amount as almost every other player on sentinels apart from johnqt.
100t.
nrg could very well show up but if they don't which has been pretty often then 100t should win.
kru has played very good this season but haven't destroyed any teams and don't look as good as lev.
lev has also played very consistently so far apart from their first game but c9 were just different then.
technically they need 11 more points for them to be guaranteed to make it. This is assuming kru wins playoffs and shanghai and wins 4 more matches in split 2 but don't make top 3 in split 2 playoffs.
Obviously this is impossible as even if sen dont make playoffs but win all their games in split 2 they would still need 7 more champ points,
and so they can never have a 100% chance of qualifying through champ points.
let's say kru wins playoffs but not shanghai and win 3 games in split 2 reg season. Sen would then need to win 3 to 4 out of 4 games in the regular season to have enough to make shanghai off champ points assuming kru dont make top 3.
geng get massacred
you
between shyy, johnqt, less, foxy9, benjyfishy, and nAts
https://www.vlr.gg/313336/disorder-vs-coconut-crushing-people-challengers-league-oceania-stage-1-lr4
Who's that jinx guy 🤔🤔
I did watch it and it was mid
I would say for iceland that zeta vs drx or zeta vs optic was better tbh. Although that final was very good as well
and just like that, he's gone
he didnt even play 100 rounds...
also look at his stats including kickoff.
https://www.vlr.gg/player/939/mwzera/?timespan=90d
HE HAS A 0.77 RAZE RATING
even take last year.
0.92 rating on raze
I still got the highest rating in my team overall though 😉
who tf cares if the chinese government knows I watch furry porn
https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/2004/champions-tour-2024-americas-stage-1
0.74 rating average
bro went 11/31
Lew needs to chill on the adderall usage.
bro got nuked
https://vlr.gg/312926/funcrew-vs-disorder-challengers-league-oceania-stage-1-uro16/?game=all&tab=overview
how tf did I get 0.05 for the first map??
Like my stats were not that bad compared to the rest of my team and their respective ratings.
:ccccc
not wrong, tec still have a higher chance over AG
same as the chances of g2 beating loud
thanks, I had a typo and meant 33-25
they will probably try harder next time as nobody likes being one of the worse teams.
that's not the only way. Your proposing something that is way less likely.
instead you have g2 lose 2-0 and nrg lose both games and nrg can't win more than 1 map combined so they lose like 2-0 100t and 2-1 eg.
After this sen will make it assuming that they beat furia 2-0 and get a decent amount of rounds off them.
weird
you're in the wrong.
1) it is not an over reaction to try and spread light on this situation as it can destroy flyuhs reputation. It's like the wardell situation for me, both flyuh and wardell weren't the ones stream sniping/ being creepy but they were queued with the one doing the stream sniping/ creepy messages; this holds wardell and flyuh as partially responsible for this and especially since they are supposed to be role models. I won't compare them any furthur though as wardells situation was much different as he knew in advance that he was queued with a stream sniper whereas flyuh did not know his brother was going to say those messages. Flyuh also can't just not queue with this guy as it's his younger brother and if flyuh wants a healthy and good relationship with his brother then discontinuing to play with him will negatively impact his relationship.
another reason I don't find this an over reaction is because I would objectively find that it's important to try and get rid of the creepy and weird people in the valorant community and if it's done by trying to expose them in a twitter post then so be it. Just a side note I would find that since flyuh was queued with his brother and it was his brother who was being inappropriate but also in the next swiftplay there was no more creepy stuff being said then I would be heavily inclined to believe that flyuh did nothing wrong in this situation (obviously flyuh could be lying about the fact that this was his brother but I highly doubt this is the case).
2) It seems a lot of your argument was just saying that tswiftfan is over reacting but another one of your popular arguments is that you find the stuff that flyuh brother said to be just a harmless joke and so there is no point in making a massive twitter post about this. I would disagree however as joking about fucking a 12 year old is not a light hearted joke and jokes about pedophilia and this kind of behaviour can normalise or trivialise the serious nature of child abuse, this can be harmful to survivors and society as a whole.
I understand some people like dark humour jokes but pedophilia and fucking someone who is 12 even if the other person is above 14 is illegal and is morally wrong, so joking about it can be seen as condoning illegal and harmful behaviour.
this is why the joke is harmful and has some weight to it.
end:
I would take some time to consider why it is morally wrong for a 14 year old to be fucking a 12 year old and why this joke is harmful.
Discord