also, I'd be open to actually have jinggg play clove on some maps. Clove is definitely viable, as shown by FPX and Oxygen in NA tier2
Flag: | United States |
Registered: | February 1, 2023 |
Last post: | November 10, 2024 at 12:45 PM |
Posts: | 2090 |
also, I'd be open to actually have jinggg play clove on some maps. Clove is definitely viable, as shown by FPX and Oxygen in NA tier2
I missed the part where neT helped M80 shit on Blinn college. Nothing against neT, just pointing out to you that dapr's secondary calling has shown demonstrable results.
Hear me out:
Neon, Phoenix, Gekko, Skye, Astra
Counterpoint: Have something entry on jett maps, forsaken play neon, and have Jinggg play phoenix. There will still be a couple of Raze maps, so Jinggg will play raze there. TBH, I would have jinggg play raze on the newer maps bc there isn't muscle memory that needs to be overwritten in terms of satchels.
Moving onto my idea for Phoenix, if you think about it, Phoenix is really a flash initiator.
Breach vs Phoenix:
2 flashes vs 2 flashes
aftershock vs molly
stun vs wall
Jinggg can flash for his teammates as well as himself. Plus he can use the wall/molly in set executes. Jinggg has shown comfort in the phoenix.
Solo phoenix duelist like Loud was trying to do is stupid, but Phoenix played as a secondary duelist really acts as a supporting flash initiator. + since Phoenix ult is low orb count, Jinggg will get run it backs online quickly, which will be super useful in retakes.
nah, they fit each other just fine
if he isn't being boosted, then bro has entered flow state.
I only mentioned you because you taunted me on an alt.
And stop capping. Only a guy who created an alt using a vpn in a different timezone would deny an account as being his alt because of different timezones. A normal user would simply deny having an alt; they wouldn't bother with checking timezones. It's hilarious how you out yourself. You did it with the "mintibars" alt too.
what Brimstan wrote in case he tries to edit:
"Last time I checked it was you that has been mentioning me non stop.
Also that isn't my alt because unless I operate in two different time zones, it isn't possible which you would know if you didn't have the critical thinking skills of a 3rd grader"
bro taunts me on his alt bc he is still pissed at me, I point out the real reason why he's doing it, and now he's replying to me on two accounts. This guy is an absolute clown.
Stay away from me you fucking freak.
I don't understand what you're looking to get out of this.
Bro let me have munchkin as an IGL. You don't have him in your lists.
bro said he owns himself lmao
keep malding brimstan
brother stop with these sub-par baits. We know you were originally a SEN flair.
he is a baiter. He used to shill for NRG and SEN.
he's probably a bandwaggoner. OG PRX fans are dissapointed at the recent result, but we meme on ourselves harder than anyone else.
welcome to vlr.gg, where attention-deprived children seek acknowledgement by spamming shit talk about the most clouted player who recently lost a game
ain't no way you revive this shit thread for this
PRX can come up with util combos termi could only dream of. That's not the problem. PRX players need:
it's very difficult. If i were PRX i would ban bind and float breeze, but idk.
Yeah I saw this linked somewhere else as well. Kind of adds to the hypocrisy of it.
I would appreciate a response from you to #140. Also, just because you are frustrated that your argument is getting weaker, that's not a good reason to devolve to ad hominems.
Yeah, i saw that too. I'm doing my best to engage genuinely though.
"I don’t even know what to say to this, I think this is ridiculous frankly but I can see I won’t change your mind. You have just decided to think that way without anything concrete to base it off of."
Because it is literally true. If a public figure sits by on the side while something happens, it means they functionally approve it because they aren't acting to stop it. It's very simple.
bro is mad his copy-paste spam got deleted
I have no idea why you're so hyper focused on gender. I made the thread about Yinsu (and Kaquka) because those were the two tweets I saw from a thread on the valorant competitive subreddit. Their gender has nothing to do with anything. And by the way, with all the things you're trying to imply, you're assuming that I'm a certain gender.
I think Yinsu didn't voice opposition because 1. she didn't voice any opposition publicly(which was the most important thing to do) and 2. she was on the desk and seemed to have fun with Steel's segment. As a public figure, not voicing opposition to something means you functionally approve of it.
If Tombizz was on the cast that day/saw the yay segment, then yes, everything I said here applies to him too. Tombizz's tweet didn't get reposted everywhere because he isn't as promiment as a figure as Yinsu and Kaquka. So sorry I didn't see Tombizz's tweet I guess? And back when Steel did the segment, I voiced disagreement about it and him specifically. There is no mysterious targeting of only female talent here.
With respect to Sideshow and Platchat, yes, the US gov does many bad things, but living in the US is 100% better than China. In this country you can say "Fuck Trump" and "Fuck Joe Biden" when they are in the most powerful position in the country without repercussions, which is something you cannot do in China. China is a totalitarian country; to say that the US is as totalitarian as China is asinine. And with respect to your Balla point, then kindly explain why Balla has joined the boys in Korea. Debating US vs China further would venture into politics, so let's not go there. The point of me bringing up plat chat was to show that Yinsu has the ability to voice disagreement without repercussions, so she should.
Yinsu literally created a podcast with Boaster recently that is picking up a following. And now you're just casting slander onto Sideshow's motives, when unlike Yinsu, Sideshow has been decently consistent in boycotting totalitarian regimes.
That's a really poignant thing to bring up given that Yinsu actually spread this sort of toxicity a while back towards soulcas
Your response is incoherent and doesn't really make sense to me. Could you reword it? I don't get what it is you're asking. Genuinely asking you to reword so I understand.
see #140 and the discussion leading up to it
Also, you see now why I directed you to #114 earlier? You just got two lengthy responses to one comment with overlapping arguments.
I'm saying that if Sideshow can literally boycott a masters event, making a tweet saying "I think the yay bashing segment on broadcast today was wrong. Let's not spread hate." is not too much to expect from Yinsu if she supposedly cares so much about player's mental health.
You jumping in on this doesn't change the fact that Chronicle owned you.
Talk is indeed cheap. Sideshow and the rest of platchat got quite a bit of backlash for boycotting casting in Shanghai, but they did it anyway.
What is dumb about it? Yes, there are toxic users here, and I discourage that too. How is that relevant to this?
No, she only has to discourage hate when she sees it, and definitely not encourage it, which is what that EMEA segment did.
As an employee, you always have the option to say "I'm not comfortable doing this" or "I think doing this thing is wrong". So even if it was pushed by Riot Production overlords, you have the choice to voice opposition. Or if she didn't know and it just happened while she was on the desk, she has the chance afterwards to say "Hey, I thought this segment was too much." But she didn't. If anything, in her interactions with Steel across various casts, she seems to goad on his hating. And before you try to say "she has to worry about job security", the entirety of plat chat is boycotting casting in Shanghai because of their disagreements with practices of the Chinese government. Making a tweet after the broadcast saying "Hey, i think this segment was harsh and unnecessary. I don't think we should encourage hate on the broadcast." would be appropriate if you truly care about the mental health of players in the scene. The problem I have with her isn't the fact of her defending her boyfriend; that's fine. The problem is that she is admonishing the audience for something she helped encourage towards others.
Now, coming onto what you said in #111. First of all, you are pushing an assumption about production control as fact. And as I said above, you still have the choice as an employee to voice disapproval. Secondly, there is evidence to suggest that the whole segment was planned by the broadcast talent/with broadcast talent approval. If you watch all the discussion that occurred around the time when Americas production showed FNS' stats from the MiBR game in 2023, the conclusions from that were that local production and desk analysts have a lot of control over the show, and if things were left entirely to them, they wouldn't fine anyone for shooting bodies. So if we're going to make assumptions based on data, it is more likely that Yinsu was at the very least passively involved in the creation of the segment.
Lastly, "she doesn't see the effect/toll of other players receiving hate" is such an infuriating and hair-splitting bullshit argument. As a human being capable of fucking logical reasoning, if you/a loved receiving hate negatively affects you, it is fucking OBVIOUS that someone receiving even more intense hate will be affected. In the case of yay, she even DID SEE how it was affecting him because of yay's depressed tweets. So it would be good of her to CONSISTENTLY discourage hate in the community, not only when it comes around to someone she cares about.
To wrap it up, no one is saying defending your loved ones is a bad thing. That is a mischaracterization of this thread. This thread is highlighting her hypocritical act, and the goal of it is to get her to start discouraging excessive hate whenever it happens, which she is in a position to do as a leading broadcast talent.
What are you yapping about? I was going to respond to you, but someone else already wrote what I was going to say. So I directed you to something someone else already said that I felt was relevant. No point in typing out something twice.
wait, brother, 21+7 doesn't equal 24...