Which was more dominant and why?
simply put Sentinels since they didnt drop a single map, let alone a series but i guess you can also take into consideration how close games were? especially the grand finals, although it was a 3-0 all the maps against Fnatic were super close but Gambit completely wiped NV/Optic + gambit first international 13-0. both dominant in their own ways imo
Ok that was definitely not based on feelings lol, if you watched the match you'd know how dominant gambit were in finals. Redgar literally picked reyna based off a twitter poll on a map they never ever play and they still won rushing a site every round. Even the yay clutch in their facecams everyone was chilling and laughing. Next map was pretty much the same, easily the most dominant lan finals till now
Sentinels. Not about who is better now (def M3C) but Sentinels were just so far ahead at the time. Not only did they win the tournament, no maps dropped but they carried this after tournament to qualify for berlin once again in dominant fashion. At Berlin, the commentators were constantly bigging up SEN. At champions it was the case for M3C, but not to the degree as this. Sentinels was basically the NIP of Valorant, I doubt a run like this will happen again. (GMB faced pretty good opposition in EU I would argue)