Optic 2-1 liquid
XIA
TL
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.98 0.59 1.24 | 229 205 246 | 15 5 10 | / 16 8 8 / | 5 3 2 | -1 -3 +2 | 70% 63% 75% | 141 129 148 | 12% 9% 14% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.89 0.19 1.36 | 224 129 288 | 15 3 12 | / 17 9 8 / | 6 1 5 | -2 -6 +4 | 60% 50% 67% | 150 80 198 | 18% 0% 24% | 4 1 3 | 5 4 1 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
0.89 0.60 1.07 | 175 142 198 | 12 4 8 | / 15 8 7 / | 6 1 5 | -3 -4 +1 | 65% 63% 67% | 117 83 139 | 16% 11% 19% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.66 0.53 0.74 | 124 134 118 | 8 4 4 | / 14 7 7 / | 4 2 2 | -6 -3 -3 | 65% 63% 67% | 82 84 81 | 19% 4% 35% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.65 0.07 1.03 | 139 73 183 | 10 2 8 | / 14 8 6 / | 1 1 0 | -4 -6 +2 | 60% 38% 75% | 80 59 94 | 12% 29% 6% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.34 1.22 1.52 | 306 280 347 | 21 12 9 | / 14 8 6 / | 6 2 4 | +7 +4 +3 | 90% 83% 100% | 206 180 246 | 32% 41% 27% | 4 1 3 | 2 1 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.34 1.18 1.58 | 220 181 280 | 18 9 9 | / 11 7 4 / | 6 3 3 | +7 +2 +5 | 85% 75% 100% | 148 122 187 | 38% 35% 40% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.34 0.78 2.18 | 241 175 341 | 18 8 10 | / 11 9 2 / | 1 0 1 | +7 -1 +8 | 70% 50% 100% | 140 109 186 | 15% 45% 6% | 5 2 3 | 0 0 0 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
1.01 0.42 1.90 | 205 113 344 | 14 4 10 | / 13 10 3 / | 3 2 1 | +1 -6 +7 | 70% 58% 88% | 132 77 216 | 16% 29% 12% | 0 0 0 | 4 4 0 | -4 -4 0 | |
|
0.61 0.60 0.62 | 67 98 21 | 5 4 1 | / 11 8 3 / | 2 1 1 | -6 -4 -2 | 65% 50% 88% | 46 73 6 | 29% 40% 0% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.36 1.16 1.25 | 226 258 208 | 60 33 27 | / 53 28 25 / | 32 14 18 | +7 +5 +2 | 75% 78% 73% | 160 175 146 | 22% 25% 20% | 4 1 3 | 3 0 3 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.04 0.83 0.93 | 173 195 155 | 46 24 22 | / 53 25 28 / | 10 7 3 | -7 -1 -6 | 67% 75% 60% | 120 140 102 | 24% 21% 28% | 8 2 6 | 3 2 1 | +5 0 +5 | |
|
0.56 1.15 0.87 | 207 168 239 | 52 23 29 | / 60 32 28 / | 22 8 14 | -8 -9 +1 | 66% 69% 63% | 143 118 165 | 23% 18% 27% | 6 1 5 | 11 9 2 | -5 -8 +3 | |
|
0.77 0.80 0.78 | 184 181 183 | 49 24 25 | / 60 29 31 / | 15 9 6 | -11 -5 -6 | 58% 56% 60% | 112 118 107 | 19% 20% 18% | 5 2 3 | 10 5 5 | -5 -3 -2 | |
|
0.48 0.94 0.72 | 183 166 198 | 49 21 28 | / 60 33 27 / | 6 4 2 | -11 -12 +1 | 59% 53% 65% | 107 101 113 | 19% 23% 15% | 11 3 8 | 15 11 4 | -4 -8 +4 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.12 1.39 1.25 | 274 247 295 | 68 33 35 | / 53 28 25 / | 34 16 18 | +15 +5 +10 | 82% 73% 92% | 173 159 188 | 27% 30% 24% | 14 5 9 | 7 5 2 | +7 0 +7 | |
|
1.39 1.04 1.22 | 272 334 207 | 75 47 28 | / 54 30 24 / | 9 5 4 | +21 +17 +4 | 66% 58% 75% | 179 220 134 | 23% 36% 8% | 10 5 5 | 9 5 4 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.89 1.28 1.07 | 218 170 279 | 51 20 31 | / 52 28 24 / | 36 22 14 | -1 -8 +7 | 79% 70% 89% | 145 112 181 | 21% 23% 19% | 8 2 6 | 8 7 1 | 0 -5 +5 | |
|
0.82 1.15 0.97 | 174 154 191 | 49 23 26 | / 50 25 25 / | 19 6 13 | -1 -2 +1 | 74% 63% 86% | 119 105 135 | 43% 38% 47% | 2 0 2 | 3 3 0 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
0.81 0.95 0.88 | 139 113 190 | 43 18 25 | / 47 23 24 / | 6 1 5 | -4 -5 +1 | 74% 73% 75% | 99 80 121 | 25% 36% 19% | 8 3 5 | 7 5 2 | +1 -2 +3 |
XIA
TL
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.24 1.42 1.06 | 239 250 228 | 21 10 11 | / 16 7 9 / | 5 4 1 | +5 +3 +2 | 75% 92% 58% | 164 194 134 | 27% 24% 31% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
1.23 1.41 1.05 | 248 306 191 | 20 13 7 | / 16 9 7 / | 8 4 4 | +4 +4 0 | 79% 83% 75% | 167 205 130 | 26% 27% 24% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.01 0.76 1.26 | 204 182 227 | 17 9 8 | / 17 9 8 / | 6 3 3 | 0 0 0 | 71% 75% 67% | 145 133 157 | 33% 24% 44% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.00 0.75 1.25 | 256 210 304 | 21 9 12 | / 20 10 10 / | 3 1 2 | +1 -1 +2 | 63% 50% 75% | 147 124 170 | 29% 47% 18% | 5 1 4 | 7 5 2 | -2 -4 +2 | |
|
0.67 0.65 0.69 | 149 148 152 | 13 7 6 | / 18 9 9 / | 5 2 3 | -5 -2 -3 | 46% 50% 42% | 88 93 82 | 23% 24% 22% | 1 1 0 | 5 3 2 | -4 -2 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.09 1.70 0.49 | 305 457 154 | 24 18 6 | / 21 10 11 / | 4 2 2 | +3 +8 -5 | 58% 58% 58% | 201 284 119 | 29% 44% 8% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.07 0.48 1.65 | 269 202 336 | 23 9 14 | / 20 12 8 / | 5 1 4 | +3 -3 +6 | 67% 42% 92% | 159 118 200 | 23% 18% 25% | 9 3 6 | 4 3 1 | +5 0 +5 | |
|
1.00 0.89 1.10 | 207 179 237 | 15 6 9 | / 18 9 9 / | 13 9 4 | -3 -3 0 | 71% 58% 83% | 136 118 155 | 31% 40% 27% | 3 0 3 | 2 2 0 | +1 -2 +3 | |
|
0.80 0.90 0.71 | 152 130 175 | 13 6 7 | / 15 6 9 / | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | 75% 75% 75% | 102 90 114 | 15% 17% 15% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.71 0.48 0.94 | 137 119 155 | 12 5 7 | / 18 9 9 / | 3 0 3 | -6 -4 -2 | 63% 50% 75% | 105 91 119 | 46% 46% 47% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 |
XIA
TL
XIA
TL
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.50 1.70 1.30 | 254 280 229 | 28 16 12 | / 22 11 11 / | 18 9 9 | +6 +5 +1 | 78% 81% 75% | 180 198 163 | 24% 29% 19% | 4 1 3 | 0 0 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
0.87 1.00 0.74 | 156 185 127 | 17 10 7 | / 23 11 12 / | 1 1 0 | -6 -1 -5 | 63% 69% 56% | 110 126 93 | 25% 29% 21% | 5 2 3 | 2 1 1 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.75 0.59 0.91 | 193 177 210 | 20 11 9 | / 26 14 12 / | 10 4 6 | -6 -3 -3 | 66% 75% 56% | 137 125 148 | 22% 21% 22% | 1 0 1 | 5 4 1 | -4 -4 0 | |
|
0.74 0.94 0.55 | 175 193 158 | 21 12 9 | / 26 12 14 / | 5 4 1 | -5 0 -5 | 59% 56% 63% | 113 131 96 | 27% 30% 22% | 1 0 1 | 4 2 2 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.56 0.47 0.65 | 154 180 129 | 18 10 8 | / 26 15 11 / | 2 2 0 | -8 -5 -3 | 56% 63% 50% | 95 105 85 | 14% 9% 21% | 4 2 2 | 6 4 2 | -2 -2 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.32 1.53 1.11 | 247 257 238 | 24 12 12 | / 19 8 11 / | 23 13 10 | +5 +4 +1 | 88% 88% 88% | 162 173 150 | 25% 30% 22% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.24 1.60 0.88 | 270 362 180 | 33 21 12 | / 22 11 11 / | 4 3 1 | +11 +10 +1 | 69% 63% 75% | 187 254 119 | 25% 30% 10% | 4 2 2 | 8 4 4 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
1.16 1.23 1.09 | 242 206 279 | 22 10 12 | / 21 9 12 / | 20 11 9 | +1 +1 0 | 91% 88% 94% | 158 134 183 | 18% 15% 21% | 5 2 3 | 2 1 1 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.10 0.91 1.29 | 197 111 285 | 25 8 17 | / 21 9 12 / | 2 0 2 | +4 -1 +5 | 78% 88% 69% | 131 79 183 | 31% 50% 24% | 6 1 5 | 2 2 0 | +4 -1 +5 | |
|
0.94 0.80 1.08 | 166 160 173 | 19 9 10 | / 21 9 12 / | 10 3 7 | -2 0 -2 | 75% 63% 88% | 111 102 121 | 45% 35% 54% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 |
bruh my pickems were soo good but then optic fucked me. I knew they wouldnt make playoffs but i thought they wouldnt lose map 1 either
Bruh I had nip as bottom bracket run didn’t predict them winning fnatic cuz I thought Derek was playing
TL vs Optic
Screamdak1ng vs El-Diablo
Optic 2-1. very close match and liquid qualify thru lower bracket
Xerxia 2-1, didn't think they'd be here but I think they're better than Liquid
Statistically speaking, SEA never won against an EMEA team ever. Ez money on Liquid
Liquid fluked their ass into here because Putin is a piece of shit. Ez money on Xerxia.
Agreed they were not supposed to be here, but that doesn't mean Liquid can't do anything
I think one team has to win 2-1 and I'm guessing it's TL 2-1 Xerxia
I don't think there will be 2-0 in this match
(from thailand)
Well, XERXIA definetely looks stronger than Liquid, so I'll predict a 2x1 XERXIA here.
Even if they lose I think they can qualify through lowers.
APAC, also known as "All Players Are Cracked", is by far the greatest region in Valorant. They have the best highlights, most handsome pros and smartest strats in all of Valorant. If you don't agree, you are probably a filthy Jett main.
2-1, not sure between XIA or LIQUID
cuz XIA might gets a slightly chance to W for this if LIQUID choked… (tbh, I think the LIQUID didn’t choke quite easily while meets XIA)
This might actually be the first time in val history where an apac team might go into a game as favourites over a major region team maybe not vote-wise but favourites as in analytically they were better and look like they play better type u know?
aim might be lil diff, but asian teams have many good strats and also xia through the smoke kills is kinda nuts. GLHF
Yeah! either of the teams could win but I am sure it will be 2-1 and atleast 2 close maps
I did this post my mistake. Anyone knows how to delete posts on this thing??
Doesn't matter who wins this, After yesterday I am sure Xia and TL qualify for playoffs. XIA might win againt Liquid sending them to lower bracket tho but GL to both teams!
xia aim looked sharp asf against optic so hopefully we see some close games
Liquid 2-1 Xia normally but if Xia play like yesterday wont suprised 2-1 for Xia and Liquid vs Kru last spot playoffs
I think yesterday Scream was underperforming quite a bit. If he turn on his beast mode, They're fucked.
From what we've seen yesterday from Xerxia, this will be a fucking bangger!
Lets go liquid!! EMEA on top!
XIA 2-1 lulquid. ScreaM tilted and punch his brother nivera cause missed the OP shot hihi
Supporting Scream and brudda but I also want more thailand to keep going, lfg xia
what happened to odds? from 3 to 1.6 on XERXIA. matchfixed confirmed as FNC match with "2 stand-ins"
insane 2-0 fluke vs optic gaming, just to lose a 6-1 lead on icebox vs liquid, wp thailand
lol TL could have won Icebox easily by having Jampi OPing at B but Scream just have to wall it off
rip 3500
Lose every man advantage after 9-7
+6 in opening duels and still lose map..
Everyone on xerxia is really good! The teamplay and util is pretty good, but I find its especially cool how they manage to scale up to sites perfectly while managing to save most of their util for takes
if u lose 1-2 to LULQUID you are not good team, just saying it
at least in EU
KRU lose to liquid 3 times but they beat gambit one map and fnatic, so KRU is bad?? Valorant doesn't work like that brother, it's not counter strike
if they lose against optic or xerxia = yes they are bad
u can't call a team good when they can not make it to playoffs
i dont care about pasts results, and how good they were 4 month ago
Both team with the cringiest comps : it's either Jampi go kill or Crws just wall.
/s
What a fucking series!!!!
XERXIA you guys are beasts. So happy for liquid though. Let's gooo
man both teams played out of their minds, but after this, I can confidently say that NA truly is just bad kekw
Sad to see xerxia fall for a team that didn't even deserve to qualify. Ggs
actually qualify or not TL is a top tier team. EU qualifiers also hard, and g2 hardly make into group stage and now they are 2nd seed of emea
Jamppi actually saved the day for liquid on map 3. Those entries on attack from a short were insane. Also his ult was so good, getting two frags on ult every time. If not for him, liquid would have lost for sure.
He carried them back into the map on Icebox too. They were losing 6-1 and he started popping off getting 2-3 kills with instant headshots and really carried the comeback to 6-6. Then in the 2nd half they had him playing A when Xerxia just went B every round and abused them with KJ/Viper after plant setups
NT Xia u guys played well TL are back in correct form and showed they prep this
Stupid liq noobs , don't even deserve to be here . Lucky shits getting carried by one player . As usual , they will choke in playoffs and lose with huge margins . Bunch of stealers who can never win the tourney .
dude, it's true that they is there becuz of fluke. but they also dont deserve the hate because of that. They dont even steal anything
geez, chill
« Replying to this : Stupid liq noobs , don't even deserve to be here . Lucky shits getting carried by one player . As usual , they will choke in playoffs and lose with huge margins . Bunch of stealers who can never win the tourney . » In case you edit the post (imgur.com/a/xj7udTS)
To think that Liquid is already in playoffs when they were gonna be out of the tourney.. EMEA region as a whole is just too strong man, too many good teams.
Very well played by Xerxia, they also deserve to go playoffs tbh, after seeing how they played these 2 matches they can beat OpTic/KRU to qualify.
You really think KRU and Xerxia are weak teams? Do you watch valorant esports?
haha u have to see foxz stream, he said surf was just following the instruction from him because he knows surf have minim experience in tournament. Meanwhile pati have a lot experience so he knows when he should play with team or just go with individual step up
I think Xerxia still have a chance if they are to fight with Team Liquid again. I haven't watch the 3rd map yet but from the first 2 maps, their 2 initiators could have better assisted their entry fragger with some utils to ease his stress. Nevertheless, I think Xerxia did a very good job fighting against an EMEA team. Great job my Thai friends!!! :) sScary with a 6k on icebox!!! Wow!
edit* ok, I've watched map 3. 17 15. it was a close call!!! Xerxia is strong!!! I have faith in them!!!
this is the first time im appreciating an APAC team. holy molly these boys SLAP