mibr 2-0 on sentinels
cope for toronto qual <3
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.08 1.40 0.86 | 199 200 199 | 16 7 9 | / 15 4 11 / | 0 0 0 | +1 +3 -2 | 60% 75% 50% | 126 136 119 | 56% 67% 50% | 3 2 1 | 2 0 2 | +1 +2 -1 | |
![]() |
1.07 0.58 1.39 | 191 79 267 | 13 2 11 | / 13 5 8 / | 4 4 0 | 0 -3 +3 | 55% 63% 50% | 134 64 181 | 52% 29% 60% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
![]() |
0.85 0.73 0.93 | 146 142 150 | 10 4 6 | / 14 5 9 / | 3 2 1 | -4 -1 -3 | 65% 75% 58% | 93 75 105 | 35% 20% 44% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
![]() |
0.64 1.13 0.31 | 182 297 105 | 11 8 3 | / 17 7 10 / | 3 2 1 | -6 +1 -7 | 60% 75% 50% | 128 207 76 | 25% 28% 20% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
![]() |
0.52 0.76 0.36 | 134 177 106 | 7 4 3 | / 16 6 10 / | 9 2 7 | -9 -2 -7 | 55% 50% 58% | 89 105 78 | 24% 25% 23% | 1 1 0 | 4 2 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.57 1.58 1.54 | 211 209 214 | 15 9 6 | / 7 4 3 / | 13 10 3 | +8 +5 +3 | 95% 100% 88% | 146 126 177 | 44% 45% 43% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
![]() |
1.52 1.85 1.03 | 346 430 222 | 25 19 6 | / 13 7 6 / | 3 1 2 | +12 +12 0 | 70% 75% 63% | 209 244 157 | 26% 30% 17% | 7 6 1 | 3 1 2 | +4 +5 -1 | |
![]() |
1.09 1.03 1.18 | 158 123 210 | 11 5 6 | / 10 5 5 / | 6 3 3 | +1 0 +1 | 95% 92% 100% | 102 85 127 | 23% 36% 16% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
![]() |
0.95 0.98 0.91 | 194 227 145 | 16 11 5 | / 13 8 5 / | 4 2 2 | +3 +3 0 | 60% 58% 63% | 116 133 91 | 39% 36% 50% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
![]() |
0.58 0.51 0.68 | 112 98 133 | 8 4 4 | / 14 8 6 / | 5 4 1 | -6 -4 -2 | 60% 42% 88% | 68 67 71 | 24% 20% 28% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
0.97 1.17 1.08 | 174 166 187 | 27 11 16 | / 29 13 16 / | 10 5 5 | -2 -2 0 | 68% 65% 71% | 124 113 133 | 27% 17% 36% | 1 0 1 | 3 0 3 | -2 0 -2 | |
![]() |
1.15 1.01 1.07 | 200 185 212 | 35 16 19 | / 31 13 18 / | 4 1 3 | +4 +3 +1 | 66% 70% 63% | 134 124 141 | 38% 37% 38% | 4 2 2 | 4 1 3 | 0 +1 -1 | |
![]() ![]() |
0.84 0.99 0.92 | 215 228 210 | 34 16 18 | / 36 18 18 / | 8 3 5 | -2 -2 0 | 66% 65% 67% | 147 157 138 | 21% 25% 18% | 10 5 5 | 8 5 3 | +2 0 +2 | |
![]() |
0.49 1.18 0.87 | 172 90 236 | 26 6 20 | / 33 15 18 / | 17 7 10 | -7 -9 +2 | 59% 50% 67% | 112 57 157 | 32% 18% 38% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |
![]() |
0.63 0.51 0.56 | 129 159 103 | 16 10 6 | / 35 18 17 / | 21 7 14 | -19 -8 -11 | 64% 60% 67% | 84 92 78 | 19% 18% 20% | 3 3 0 | 6 3 3 | -3 0 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.52 1.45 1.49 | 313 349 265 | 49 30 19 | / 27 16 11 / | 9 4 5 | +22 +14 +8 | 70% 71% 70% | 186 198 172 | 28% 32% 23% | 12 9 3 | 7 4 3 | +5 +5 0 | |
![]() ![]() |
1.15 1.41 1.27 | 204 184 227 | 32 16 16 | / 23 14 9 / | 20 13 7 | +9 +2 +7 | 86% 92% 80% | 132 109 160 | 32% 32% 31% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
![]() |
0.86 1.47 1.13 | 218 184 262 | 36 16 20 | / 28 17 11 / | 20 9 11 | +8 -1 +9 | 66% 58% 75% | 133 109 161 | 36% 39% 33% | 7 4 3 | 4 2 2 | +3 +2 +1 | |
![]() ![]() |
1.11 1.16 1.13 | 200 186 225 | 33 16 17 | / 27 14 13 / | 16 9 7 | +6 +2 +4 | 84% 83% 85% | 125 119 131 | 20% 24% 16% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
![]() |
0.51 0.44 0.48 | 102 111 88 | 14 9 5 | / 33 18 15 / | 14 6 8 | -19 -9 -10 | 66% 54% 80% | 68 75 60 | 34% 42% 26% | 2 1 1 | 4 1 3 | -2 0 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.28 1.14 1.42 | 202 181 224 | 17 7 10 | / 15 8 7 / | 7 3 4 | +2 -1 +3 | 71% 58% 83% | 149 138 160 | 23% 16% 31% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
![]() |
1.15 0.64 1.66 | 248 182 315 | 23 8 15 | / 19 11 8 / | 5 1 4 | +4 -3 +7 | 71% 58% 83% | 163 124 201 | 18% 21% 17% | 8 4 4 | 5 4 1 | +3 0 +3 | |
![]() |
1.07 0.99 1.16 | 200 176 225 | 19 9 10 | / 16 9 7 / | 4 1 3 | +3 0 +3 | 71% 67% 75% | 140 117 163 | 28% 24% 31% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
![]() |
0.70 0.43 0.98 | 152 98 206 | 13 4 9 | / 20 10 10 / | 13 3 10 | -7 -6 -1 | 63% 42% 83% | 94 53 134 | 20% 13% 23% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
![]() |
0.60 0.54 0.66 | 124 148 101 | 9 6 3 | / 19 12 7 / | 12 5 7 | -10 -6 -4 | 71% 67% 75% | 81 84 77 | 15% 12% 18% | 2 2 0 | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.46 1.19 1.73 | 280 267 294 | 24 11 13 | / 14 9 5 / | 6 3 3 | +10 +2 +8 | 71% 67% 75% | 167 152 183 | 30% 34% 27% | 5 3 2 | 4 3 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
![]() |
1.29 0.74 1.84 | 241 142 341 | 20 5 15 | / 15 9 6 / | 16 7 9 | +5 -4 +9 | 71% 58% 83% | 146 85 208 | 34% 44% 30% | 4 2 2 | 3 2 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
![]() |
1.17 1.19 1.15 | 241 249 234 | 22 11 11 | / 17 9 8 / | 10 6 4 | +5 +2 +3 | 75% 75% 75% | 144 153 134 | 18% 19% 17% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
![]() |
1.02 0.72 1.32 | 197 159 235 | 17 7 10 | / 16 10 6 / | 7 3 4 | +1 -3 +4 | 79% 83% 75% | 121 92 150 | 22% 19% 24% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
![]() |
0.39 0.51 0.27 | 91 125 57 | 6 5 1 | / 19 10 9 / | 9 2 7 | -13 -5 -8 | 71% 67% 75% | 68 83 52 | 50% 73% 22% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 |
In the SEN G2 game, when both teams practically perma-banned Fracture, SEN was the one who ended up banning it, so I don't see why it would be different here. I'd say SEN picking Pearl makes sense, or Haven both have a 50/50 chance of getting picked, SEN banning Ascent makes 0 sense, though? MIBR has a 0% win rate on that map, losing to Furia and G2, while SEN has a 100% win rate. MIBR banning Split also doesn't make much sense over Haven because SEN have a 75% win rate on Haven and MIBR have a 67% win rate on it, while on Split, SEN have a 67% win rate and MIBR have a 100%.
I do agree that it will be a 2-1 either way.