i'm bored

wheefelinloof

8/4 was my first idea, but after writing the script of tomorrow video (That is now fully ready ^-^), I feel now 8/4 wouldn't be the worst of the 2 world

• 10/2 : (With T2 team allowed to qual), allow stability and everyone to be represented especially in APAC where it's almost 1 team = 1 market (Plus a JP team easily removable, and the 3 KR team that are fully historic and hard to kick out), and still OCE and VN not being represented
• 6/6 : would be great for China and AMER, because we can have a group of partner (with rivalry that build of time), and a group of ascension (and bottom 2 being relegated), and still being sure that every market have representation. But for APAC where it's nearly impossible to kickanyone without loosing any market (beside ZETA or DFM and maybe DRX or GEN), and may need to split in 2 (Wish is good new for OCE that can finally have a spot). Of course we need a rule that ensure no T2 region steal the 6 spot (And have 3 team or 4 ascension spot maximum per T2 region)
• 8/4 : We can't make the 2 group and it's bad, because it's important for competitive integrity that every ascension team are in the same group so we can really now wish one deserve the relegation, and we still need to wipeout too many team. We still need the "3 ascention team per T2 max", but it would be mush less efficient since it's allow only 1 place for the other T2
• 9/3 : Is good, RIP DFM or ZETA, and still give a potential spot for CIS and MENA without kicking too many teams, solve the issue of having a finalist relegated and make things easier since we don't need the "3 team max per T2" rule

So

• Good : 10/2, 9/3, 6/6 (APAC split in 2)
• Bad : 8/4, 6/6 (no split)

so was it bait or nah

I don't think anyone need to desribe the current situation since we know it.

So prescriptive only please.

What ? A T2 team in T1 is a T1 team ?