Best Bind comp = 0 Sentinel

48,5% Non MIrror Winrate, not great :/

Really good question

• 1/ it's NonMirror Winrate and not only Win Rate
• 2/ the sample is Tier 1 and Tier 2, split 2 (I consider make Split 1 too to have a better samplesize, but the meta kinda shifted with Viper nerf, so I prefered not to do it), since I have both Split 1 and 2 I have a samplesize big enough to have something intresting. I have 5994 composition to analysis overall, and 806 on Bind only.
• 3/ If thats not enough, I calculate the P-value to see if my data are significant or if I need to just stay suspicious but not be sure, (And what I call the polarised P-value, it’s just 1-pval or pval-1, so in a blink of an eye you can see if the data the percent of chance the NMWR is it’s because of noise or not)

Does it answer to your question or do you need more precision ^^ ?

I made a full video that explain the concept of archetype : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGHldAjmDes (And the start of the video make a full summup of what are the archetype

In short term : "Composition archetype" is the roles of your archetype.

• In the class nomenclature, it counts how many duelist, initiator, sentinel, controller you have in your composition. Every composition have at least 1 1 initiator and 1 controller, and usually 1 duelist, so the name of the archetype is the 1st letter of the 2 remaining class agent
• In the spell nomenclature, it asks if you have one diver, one flasher, one recon, one sentinel, one controller, if one lack, the archetype is named 0-X (X being the first letter of the spell that missing) so "0S" is 0-sentinel archetype, "classical", are composition where one specific agent do one specific spell, "hybrid" are composition that have an agent that do 2 things and so it opens a spot for a remaining agent.

I s a little bit more clear ? ^-^

She and Iso are so weird, that the only 2 agents that have no dive, no flash, no regen, no sent spell, no controller spell, and they are fucking TOP 3 on overall map (Clove completing the top 3 is also hilarious). Sage is top 1, 58,5% NMWR on 318, pval 0.2, (So PPV 99.8%), her data are absolutely significant, she is an absolute nonsense and will be absolutely busted after an up.

I'm a statistician more than an analyst, so maybe I should really study how Sage play to have a so good result... Maybe one of her strength is being an absolute counter to the postplant meta. Then, I think she usually replaces an initiator flasher, and flasher are bad (Breach 45%, Kayo 48%, Gekko and Skye are ok but replace usually the recon, so the spot is still open for her)

I have so many things to say about her, she was my main, and she is still my most played agent, and I'm still cluless on how to analyze her, it's a subject I will HAVE to work on, because, Sage is still not classed in the class meta because, well... I can't consider her as a Sentinel, not possible, she was never played as such, doesn't have the spell, and it makes no sense to put her in, I'm still considering putting her in controller, maybe even in Initiator if I realize her wall is most used to take space aggressively. If she is already a hidden OP, and she is about to receive an up, she will be picked, I can't continue class her in her own special role (Named 7)

I can't wait to see the up, this will probably help me to take a decision.

Please if you have any analyze about her tell me. (Gonna be usefull for my next video)