rare atom
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
298 | 26 | / 12 / | 7 | +14 | ||||||||
|
260 | 22 | / 14 / | 10 | +8 | ||||||||
|
255 | 21 | / 16 / | 7 | +5 | ||||||||
|
189 | 14 | / 18 / | 6 | -4 | ||||||||
|
117 | 9 | / 15 / | 18 | -6 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
251 | 19 | / 20 / | 6 | -1 | ||||||||
|
193 | 16 | / 17 / | 6 | -1 | ||||||||
|
185 | 15 | / 17 / | 2 | -2 | ||||||||
|
175 | 12 | / 18 / | 6 | -6 | ||||||||
|
153 | 13 | / 21 / | 3 | -8 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
211 | 41 | / 41 / | 16 | 0 | ||||||||
|
199 | 41 | / 42 / | 10 | -1 | ||||||||
|
156 | 27 | / 44 / | 8 | -17 | ||||||||
|
144 | 29 | / 43 / | 12 | -14 | ||||||||
|
142 | 23 | / 44 / | 29 | -21 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
312 | 57 | / 31 / | 15 | +26 | ||||||||
|
275 | 53 | / 40 / | 12 | +13 | ||||||||
|
205 | 39 | / 32 / | 11 | +7 | ||||||||
|
196 | 40 | / 29 / | 22 | +11 | ||||||||
|
116 | 25 | / 30 / | 18 | -5 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
207 | 10 | / 14 / | 6 | -4 | ||||||||
|
184 | 9 | / 15 / | 7 | -6 | ||||||||
|
179 | 10 | / 16 / | 3 | -6 | ||||||||
|
132 | 7 | / 14 / | 1 | -7 | ||||||||
|
115 | 5 | / 13 / | 2 | -8 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
414 | 25 | / 6 / | 6 | +19 | ||||||||
|
247 | 15 | / 11 / | 4 | +4 | ||||||||
|
228 | 13 | / 10 / | 5 | +3 | ||||||||
|
189 | 12 | / 8 / | 8 | +4 | ||||||||
|
108 | 7 | / 6 / | 6 | +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
167 | 9 | / 13 / | 0 | -4 | ||||||||
|
165 | 8 | / 13 / | 0 | -5 | ||||||||
|
124 | 5 | / 14 / | 4 | -9 | ||||||||
|
121 | 5 | / 14 / | 0 | -9 | ||||||||
|
46 | 1 | / 13 / | 4 | -12 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
347 | 20 | / 7 / | 3 | +13 | ||||||||
|
327 | 19 | / 9 / | 2 | +10 | ||||||||
|
206 | 12 | / 4 / | 8 | +8 | ||||||||
|
202 | 11 | / 5 / | 4 | +6 | ||||||||
|
86 | 5 | / 3 / | 9 | +2 |
No don't worry!
I've only seen YOU play twice on XLG, but so far I think it's safe to say that Trace isn't missing out on anything. He's had some good moments but nothing special. Is he T1 material? I think just.
Overall he's not amazing but definitely not a bad player. If he works on his consistency and produce more positive results regularly then it would mean the world for XLG.
We'll have to see more from him though, but i hope that helps!
If you are having a hard time comprehending it to the point where you think it's absurd, then maybe think of the alternative: there is no matchfixing and that XLG came out on top this time because they were just better.
After all, that's sports. Upsets happen. I'm not defending matchfixing and saying that there is no matchfixing, but I think there's always a B you can consider before jumping from A to C.