DRX take | VLR.gg

#1

The way I understand it, Flashback and this person had intimate relations (but not a relationship), and they are both young. This person then had intercourse, and told Flashback to not to ejaculate whilst inside, but he did anyway.

my take is:
There is absolutely no way to know if this was an accident or malicious. As the intercourse was consensual, the absence of a condom was too (No evidence to suggest otherwise). Therefore this was a possibility all along, and they should've known it. To me this just seems like a story wildly blown out of proportion, two adolescents who messed up.

side note: The reason why I'm not hesitant to mention Flashback by name is because all evidence, including replies from the alleged 'victim' strongly point towards him being the alleged 'attacker'.

#2

AlexSMTx

13

Frags

+

–

so they had consensual relations, and the allegations started bc he ended inside? I thought it was gonna be something crazier like actually forcing someone to have intercourse

#3

fun_at_the_waterslide

6

Frags

+

–

My point exactly, that's what it seemed like when I first read about the drama but the more I looked at the sources the more it started to seem like the former.

#7

AlexSMTx

6

Frags

+

–

Definitely blown out of proportion imo, not saying ignoring such request is fine but the magnitude of this whole thing seems just crazy. Specially at that age where adolescents start experimenting with such stuff. I'm just saying I've seen some threads where they paint what he did like straight up r4pe, when bro could probably be getting cancelled bc he couldn't hold it in long enough before pulling out 😭

#4

kanyefan4238173

6

Frags

+

–

what im getting from this is that he just nutted fast and got lost in the moment

#6

fun_at_the_waterslide

3

Frags

+

–

basically yeah

#5

Denjisideals

4

Frags

+

–

They keep changing the narratives. One moment it's a minor the next it's SA the next it is non consentual nutting. I don't know what is even happening

#8

merciless-pity8989-89

3

Frags

+

–

last one

#9

fun_at_the_waterslide

3

Frags

+

–

It seems to be the last one, unless there is more evidence that comes out, but it seems unlikely that there will be anything else to be said by a primary source that would drastically change what we are talking about here

#10

jubby

-2

Frags

+

–

I think before Champs start, DRX will be putting out another statement about the accused player and whether they'll play or not. Due to roster locks happening soon, they will be forced to either suspend the player and pick up a sub or have the accused play during Champs.

#11

fun_at_the_waterslide

1

Frags

+

–

Yeah that's a possibility.
To clarify I was talking more about anything that may change the allegations being made

#12

jubby

0

Frags

+

–

Yeah, I get what you mean. I'm just confused about the allegations and if they "make sense" kinda.

#13

Utolevia

0

Frags

+

–

The victim's points are valid, but her intention to get back at the accused is also malicious considering the timing.

If anyone remembers fl1pzjder and TenTen drama, we already know that the conduct of a professional esports player is something that both orgs and Riot take seriously, so I'm not surprised if this player gets kicked considering the circumstances:

Cheating on someone
Non-consensual Ejac
Not properly resolving his relationship issues before going pro / not disclosing it to the org beforehand