Could someone give me a TLDR?
Here is a link to a video for the 100t drama
https://www.youtube.com/live/bRmjTxqTBiw?si=1m0FmpJGhwZNiZhH
Basically Dryad (LATAM Analysist if you don't know her) was talking about 100T and said that based on some interview answers that she thinks their internal team chem is horrible, but the way she worded it made it seem like the opinion she gave was fact, so 100T players took offense. Obviously Boostio replied saying we are perfectly fine internally and was just annoyed because analysist said an opinion that was spoken like a fact
I think its poor wording on her part in that case
it should be common knowledge that anything you say on the internet will be taken as fact by a sum of people regardless if it was an opinion or not.
I think the correct wording could have been something like
"From the interviews I have had with them, they seem very open about their issues. I could be wrong but it could mean they have slight internal issues"
or something along the lines of this
Im sure if the 100t players didnt see the public take dryads comment as truth they would not have said anything about it