I think they have the perfect balance of aim and good strats, yeah Pacific has some cracked aimers and EU have good set plays but it seems like Americas are the most versatile and coordinated. Bump if agree π₯
At Shanghai:
NA team seed 1
NA team 2-0 in groups
2 NA/3 SA player team 1-1 in groups
4 out of 4 pure SA teams did not make Shanghai
even though it was mickey mouse
4/5 NA player team won Madrid
In the past:
4 NA teams have won intl. LANs
1 BR team has one an intl. LAN
like bro sure BR has some amazing AMAZING individual players (current and past loud roster(s) except for qck, heat is great, mwzera SOMETIMES, etc)
but like dont just straight up lie
LATAM and BR are the same region bro... they're both Latin America. The only difference is that Valorant picked up more in Brazil compared to other Latin American countries (where valorant was pretty much dead compared to its main competitor cs), so Riot had to combine teams from both North America and South America to fill the gap (and invent the LATAM leagues, which were 2... LATAM North and LATAM South)
You have to be delusional to call the region not dead when you have players from over 30 countries all crammed in 2 teams, because there's virtually no other top teams to join. And even then, those LATAM teams still end up with North American players on the roster.
Your entire argument is based on nothing... each region is 1 region, and will concentrate even more into 1 region the longer this franchise system continues. All top players eventually will end up coming from the VCT hubs or their proximities.