MADRID PROVING WHY THEIR THE COMEBACK KINGS…. HARRY KANE IS CURSED 💀💀
7
HALA MADRID
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
Well, there was extra stoppage after the 90th minute. But yeah it prolly wasnt 5 minutes.
Personally, offside rule varies alot from league to league, if the UCL goes by the rule that any part of the body count. Its a goal, but if its only parts that you can touch the ball then his knee might cause an offside
You gotta look at Rudiger's foot, and Bayern's player knee. We can debate but that's what people are getting wrong, it's not if it's not offside it is a goal, Lunin didn't even dive, play was over
This is not comparable to a goal wrongly called offside
It's comparable to stopping a counterattack for a foul that's not a foul
Clearly on, look at my comment at #35. Even if it was off, that situation warranted a no offside call anyways. (Also ignore this guy's too much time claim, the incident happened at 12 minutes and there was 9 minutes extra time plus referee signaled that he was giving a few more minutes at the end of the 9 minutes because of time wasting.
-
Player wasn't off? Defender's trailing boot keeps him on. Pic Compare to the line of color change on the grass (a bit hard to see).
-
Despite the ball being intended for him, the defender made clear contact and headed the ball away, resulting in a new change of play, making the question of offside irrelevant. Had the ball for example grazed the defender's head and landed in front of the Bayern player who shot/passed it (and assuming he was off) then it's a fair offside.
At the end of the day, it was a referring mistake which unfortunately happens. The assistant ref should not have raised his flag but stick to the convention of waiting for the play to be over before raising it, especially when it's so tight like that (imagine if they had blown the whistle on the other end of the field for when Madrid scored off the initial offside call and the play stopped before the ball went in, only to find out it wasn't off after). The referee should have also not have been reactionary to the assistant ref's flag raise and not blown the whistle so soon, hence the reason they couldn't go back on the play and review it. Had it been reviewed though, I have no doubt the goal would have stood. Also, the ref signaled with his hand that he added a few more additional minutes on the clock because of wasted time towards the end of the extra 9 minutes.
Yeah I get that, but it was a refereeing mistake. Like I already said, it wasn't offside, and even if he was the situation of the play does not warrant an offside call. Yes the whistle blow was a confusing mistake, but at the end of the day, there is no doubt that it was a wrong call in favor of Madrid.
we can debate the offside but that's the whole point, this is not comparable with a goal called offside wrongly, it's comparable to stopping the counterattack for an offensive foul that's not a foul, everything that happens after does not count. So it is a much lesser mistake and if you take into account it was 5 minutes overtime for no reason calling it a robbery is more than a reach
You just said a whole lot of nothing. But no it's not debatable, anyone with 2 eyes can see that it was on, plus like I already said several times, the defender made clear contact and headed the ball away, resulting in a new change of play making that offside call irrelevant. Also, there was 9 minutes of additional time, and on top of that, the referee signaled with his hand that he was adding a few more additional minutes towards the end of the 9 min because of time wasting. That specific instance occurred at 12 minutes added time. Your argument about going overtime makes zero sense.
He said he was adding 2 min with his fingers, that's 3 so that does make sense.
If you read what I just said it is perfectly understandable you just don't wanna hear it. I'm saying regardless of what you think of the offside anything that happened after the whistle does not matter dude. You cannot assume it would have ended in a goal you just can't.
This is not like if they scored a goal and then reviewed it wrong, it's not even comparable to that situation
Yes I know they blew the whistle, I acknowledged that earlier. Ironically it seems perhaps you weren't reading what I said? Referees always let the play go on, especially if there are people on the floor or players wasting time (as was the case here). You're acting like you never see a ref go a minute over? In fact, almost every game the ref lets it play on for a bit longer. Again, your argument about the time makes no sense.
The denial and excuses of such a blatant mistake is insane ngl.
Discord