Giants seemed pretty good in LCQ, also 3 0'd Navi in a clean fashion
BLG BEAT NRG 2-0 WHILE EDG SMOKED CHINA QUALIFIERS
ODDS ARE 75:25 IN FAVOR OF EDG
how does that relate to giants
I am trying to say edg are much stronger than giants by this relation
but there is no relation
Nrg> Giants Bilibili<EDG Bilibili>nrg Giants <bilibili Giants<<edg
Current NRG is not better than Giants
You are delusional NA glazer fanboying Asian teams
say what you want but nrg got 4th at tokyo and giants' only achievement is beating a weak and trash navi. also edg clears bilibili a lot, so edg should win.
Wait and see
nrg mickey run, none of the teams they beat won a game after they lost to them
Well they should still be pretty equal to Giants so EDG > Giants still
if we are using lock in then we can use 100t > edg and there we get some very weird relations such as 100 > edg Mibr > 100 Mibr >> edg
EDG < TL TL < Navi Navi < NRG NRG < BLG BLG < EDG
EDG <<<< EDG
EDG <<<< EDG DAMNNNNNNNN son
NRG is better than Giants EDG is better than BLG by a big gap BLG smoked NRG therefore EDG is better than Giants
We can also look at it this way: EDG struggled against a slumping Na'vi at Tokyo and Giants owned them in LCQ, therefore, Giants have a good chance?
EDG improvement from Navi game to loud game simply states that they have a higher ceiling than giants
But Loud were already slumping, they have internal problems
how does ceiling equate to a 75 percent win probability especially for a team that hasnt exactly shown that they can live up to that ceiling
what is blud wafflin about??
don't underestimate giants. they win over edg
I have faith in EDG 2-0