this is based off REGIONAL DEPTH at the peak of each region's best teams. how a region ranking SHOULD be done
EMEA
NA
BR
EA (east asia)
APAC
LATAM
I'm sorry but those of us that are rational and not trying to push a narrative aren't going to just accept that. Until winning champions is actually significantly harder than winning other international tournaments, (which hasn't been the case so far) no one's perception of overall regional strength, or at least strength of top teams from participating regions, which is what is really being tested, is going to change with one tournament win.