1

suygetsu deleted tweet

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
trembolonaRage

https://prnt.sc/8m7RuhNqynVP

why did he delete the tweet?
is he scared of RIOT?
was it really illegal?

#2
ChubbyChoob
0
Frags
+

rematch !!!

#15
Quagmire
-1
Frags
+

nah

#18
ChubbyChoob
-2
Frags
+

why tho ?? Suygetsu literally cheated

#37
ASHAS-ASDASDASGASA
2
Frags
+

bro they owned kru

#42
idkmate99
1
Frags
+

13-9 while using an exploit is owned?

Owned on Ascent, but not the exploit map

#31
pokez
0
Frags
+

there will be no rematch he used it once and kru won that round

#3
ValulrantLUL
2
Frags
+

probably banned after the match, he wouldnt have used it if he had known

#4
h9zard
18
Frags
+

they should have done the same thing with Vivo Keyd at Champs last year. the inconsistency in their rules is so unprofessional.

#7
ChubbyChoob
1
Frags
+

true , Riot hate SA

#11
h9zard
1
Frags
+

yeah thats what I said for sure

#23
NG1nS
0
Frags
+

lol

#9
charizard_123
0
Frags
+

That was already known to be not allowed iirc

#29
h9zard
0
Frags
+

no i dont think so. I mean why would they change the ruling if is was known to be not allowed?

#46
charizard_123
1
Frags
+

I think x10 got punished for using the same camera. It definitely was a known banned thing. People were just blaming riot for inconsistency in punishment

#12
TheHowling03
2
Frags
+

Idk. The wall is a debatable subject, the cam was not.

#25
h9zard
0
Frags
+

why?

#36
goofy_goober
1
Frags
+

cos x10 and VGIA got punished for the same cam

#40
h9zard
0
Frags
+

so why didnt FPX get punished if x10 and VGIA got punished?

edit: my not saying FPX should get punished. Im just pissed at Riot for being inconsistent with their rulings historically.

#43
ASHAS-ASDASDASGASA
0
Frags
+

i think vk does that even though they know it's bug. But that wall is not in bug list.

#45
h9zard
0
Frags
+

what abt x10 and Vgia or whoever did it first. they still got punished right?

#47
goofy_goober
0
Frags
+

yes cos in the tourney they were playing in riot has alr stated that its an exploit, but it might have been missing from champs rulebook

#48
ASHAS-ASDASDASGASA
0
Frags
+

I don't know who did it first but x10 did that August 13,2021 while Keyd Star did it December 5. Surely they know that but they still do it.

#50
charizard_123
0
Frags
+

You cant be punished for using a game mechanic that isn’t explicitly stated to be not allowed. Imagine if tomorrow they decide to make smoking illegal, should they convict the people who smoked before? It wouldnt make sense

#38
patuj
1
Frags
+

I guess the difference is that the cam bug gave VK advantage by seeing something the enemy couldn't, but I guess you can still see the Viper wall gap from both sides. So in theory it doesn't give the other side an advantage. But you are true with inconsistencies, but that is just my guess of why it went like this now.

#41
NG1nS
2
Frags
+

there's no inconsistency, that bug was used in 2 different regions and had the same punishment which is losing the map immediately, but BR got the special treatment that champions bcz of the pressure they had on twitter about it

if there's any inconsistency it was favoring VK

#6
DNRIIS
0
Frags
+

VK used camera rematch 0-7, FPX used wall only one warning.

#14
chloeburbank
0
Frags
+

1 round vs 7 rounds tho

#24
NG1nS
0
Frags
+

VK got only -7 rounds when 2 teams in APAC and EU used the same bug and lost the map immediately πŸ’€ talk about favourites

#27
dapada
-1
Frags
+

ikrπŸ’€πŸ’€πŸ’€

#28
wizardbot
-1
Frags
+

The cam was a known bug, wall isnt

#34
idkmate99
0
Frags
+

Classic EMEA not going to be punished for yet another exploit

Thanks Rito

#5
soraol
0
Frags
+

wtf?

#8
DoubleWideSurpriseYeah
0
Frags
+

oh wait

#10
Revlo
-1
Frags
+

fpx exploiting, rematch needs to happen

#17
PicKaRuu
-1
Frags
+

isn't gonna change anything anyways

#22
Revlo
1
Frags
+

a +7 advantage would win them icebox

#13
pitchfork
0
Frags
+

hm

#16
dapada
1
Frags
+

bro asking for a rematchπŸ’€πŸ’€πŸ’€
it was a one time thing and they lost that round iirc

#19
KoreanOverlord
10
Frags
+

Lmfao if wall gets banned and they dont get any repercussions

Brazil fans can genuinely complain about acend incident

#30
NG1nS
0
Frags
+

explain why ???
VK got only -7 rounds when 2 teams in APAC and EU used the same bug before them and lost the map immediately πŸ’€

althought i definitely think that if it's a bug they shouls replay the rounds that he used it if it gave them any advantage (i'm not delusional like some minority of fans)

#20
Iper
11
Frags
+

that means he probably got a warning to not use it again during the match the same thing that happened when TL face LOUD in masters 1 which both Scream and Less used exploits on Icebox and Ascent

#21
dapada
0
Frags
+

W

#26
trembolonaRage
0
Frags
+

why delete the tweet tho?

#32
Mkin11
4
Frags
+

to prevent people from talking about it and create unnecessary drama

#33
NG1nS
-6
Frags
+

bcz he doesn't want people like u to fuxking stalk and make it their personality? idk think about it

#35
KoreanOverlord
-3
Frags
+

Because classic riot pr control facist style

#44
SigmaMale
0
Frags
+

?

#39
sj67atg6
0
Frags
+

acend 2.0?

#49
JsT_
0
Frags
+

could someone link a clip of the wall please?
edit : wait , are you talking about the viper wall on icebox A?

#51
pokez
0
Frags
+

yes

#52
ASHAS-ASDASDASGASA
0
Frags
+

yes

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment