why did he delete the tweet?
is he scared of RIOT?
was it really illegal?
ValulrantLUL [#3]probably banned after the match, he wouldnt have used it if he had known
they should have done the same thing with Vivo Keyd at Champs last year. the inconsistency in their rules is so unprofessional.
ValulrantLUL [#3]probably banned after the match, he wouldnt have used it if he had known
VK used camera rematch 0-7, FPX used wall only one warning.
h9zard [#4]they should have done the same thing with Vivo Keyd at Champs last year. the inconsistency in their rules is so unprofessional.
true , Riot hate SA
h9zard [#4]they should have done the same thing with Vivo Keyd at Champs last year. the inconsistency in their rules is so unprofessional.
That was already known to be not allowed iirc
h9zard [#4]they should have done the same thing with Vivo Keyd at Champs last year. the inconsistency in their rules is so unprofessional.
Idk. The wall is a debatable subject, the cam was not.
Iper [#20]that means he probably got a warning to not use it again during the match the same thing that happened when TL face LOUD in masters 1 which both Scream and Less used exploits on Icebox and Ascent
W
DNRIIS [#6]VK used camera rematch 0-7, FPX used wall only one warning.
VK got only -7 rounds when 2 teams in APAC and EU used the same bug and lost the map immediately π talk about favourites
Iper [#20]that means he probably got a warning to not use it again during the match the same thing that happened when TL face LOUD in masters 1 which both Scream and Less used exploits on Icebox and Ascent
why delete the tweet tho?
NG1nS [#24]VK got only -7 rounds when 2 teams in APAC and EU used the same bug and lost the map immediately π talk about favourites
ikrπππ
DNRIIS [#6]VK used camera rematch 0-7, FPX used wall only one warning.
The cam was a known bug, wall isnt
charizard_123 [#9]That was already known to be not allowed iirc
no i dont think so. I mean why would they change the ruling if is was known to be not allowed?
KoreanOverlord [#19]Lmfao if wall gets banned and they dont get any repercussions
Brazil fans can genuinely complain about acend incident
explain why ???
VK got only -7 rounds when 2 teams in APAC and EU used the same bug before them and lost the map immediately π
althought i definitely think that if it's a bug they shouls replay the rounds that he used it if it gave them any advantage (i'm not delusional like some minority of fans)
trembolonaRage [#26]why delete the tweet tho?
to prevent people from talking about it and create unnecessary drama
trembolonaRage [#26]why delete the tweet tho?
bcz he doesn't want people like u to fuxking stalk and make it their personality? idk think about it
ValulrantLUL [#3]probably banned after the match, he wouldnt have used it if he had known
Classic EMEA not going to be punished for yet another exploit
Thanks Rito
h9zard [#4]they should have done the same thing with Vivo Keyd at Champs last year. the inconsistency in their rules is so unprofessional.
I guess the difference is that the cam bug gave VK advantage by seeing something the enemy couldn't, but I guess you can still see the Viper wall gap from both sides. So in theory it doesn't give the other side an advantage. But you are true with inconsistencies, but that is just my guess of why it went like this now.
goofy_goober [#36]cos x10 and VGIA got punished for the same cam
so why didnt FPX get punished if x10 and VGIA got punished?
edit: my not saying FPX should get punished. Im just pissed at Riot for being inconsistent with their rulings historically.
h9zard [#4]they should have done the same thing with Vivo Keyd at Champs last year. the inconsistency in their rules is so unprofessional.
there's no inconsistency, that bug was used in 2 different regions and had the same punishment which is losing the map immediately, but BR got the special treatment that champions bcz of the pressure they had on twitter about it
if there's any inconsistency it was favoring VK
ASHAS-ASDASDASGASA [#37]bro they owned kru
13-9 while using an exploit is owned?
Owned on Ascent, but not the exploit map
h9zard [#40]so why didnt FPX get punished if x10 and VGIA got punished?
edit: my not saying FPX should get punished. Im just pissed at Riot for being inconsistent with their rulings historically.
i think vk does that even though they know it's bug. But that wall is not in bug list.
ASHAS-ASDASDASGASA [#43]i think vk does that even though they know it's bug. But that wall is not in bug list.
what abt x10 and Vgia or whoever did it first. they still got punished right?
h9zard [#29]no i dont think so. I mean why would they change the ruling if is was known to be not allowed?
I think x10 got punished for using the same camera. It definitely was a known banned thing. People were just blaming riot for inconsistency in punishment
h9zard [#45]what abt x10 and Vgia or whoever did it first. they still got punished right?
yes cos in the tourney they were playing in riot has alr stated that its an exploit, but it might have been missing from champs rulebook
h9zard [#45]what abt x10 and Vgia or whoever did it first. they still got punished right?
I don't know who did it first but x10 did that August 13,2021 while Keyd Star did it December 5. Surely they know that but they still do it.
h9zard [#45]what abt x10 and Vgia or whoever did it first. they still got punished right?
You cant be punished for using a game mechanic that isnβt explicitly stated to be not allowed. Imagine if tomorrow they decide to make smoking illegal, should they convict the people who smoked before? It wouldnt make sense
JsT_ [#49]could someone link a clip of the wall please?
edit : wait , are you talking about the viper wall on icebox A?
yes
JsT_ [#49]could someone link a clip of the wall please?
edit : wait , are you talking about the viper wall on icebox A?
yes