im saying that optic and loud doing successful then could have been a fluke due to the fact that the meta was completely new at the time, and now that teams have adapted they might do shit now
m1 was a fluke tourney cuz no good eu teams/subs/or travel restricts were there
zeta wouldnt make it out of groups cuz of fnc, drx
g2 shit team wouldnt make it out of groups tho
fpx would roll as 1st seed
they wont and nothing is a fLuKe tOurnAment, teams improve or do you want to call every tournament a fluke because there haven't been repeats of winners
Yeah yeah yeah, fluke this, fluke that, the tournament would be real exciting if the exact same teams made every masters and placed exactly the same every time right?
Maybe underdogs winning actually make the tournament more exciting.