Masters 1 was a fluke tournament?

If Optic lose this game, I'm convinced Masters 1 was a fluke tournament

nah meta was just massively different from then compared to champions

they wont and nothing is a fLuKe tOurnAment, teams improve or do you want to call every tournament a fluke because there haven't been repeats of winners

I think now with fade as a counter to explosive neon they might lose but that does not make m1 a fluke

There’s never been a team on a good run that this website has not tried to claim is a fluke. A lot of donkeys roam this site

here we go again

sheahhhh [#3]

they wont and nothing is a fLuKe tOurnAment, teams improve or do you want to call every tournament a fluke because there haven't been repeats of winners

the whole EU wasn't there

Meta changes teams improve nothing else

SENzombs [#2]

nah meta was just massively different from then compared to champions

.

Loud and Zeta both weak and both were top-3

Makes you question how good Reykjavik was lol

TL and G2

Does it answer your question?

everything is a fluke bro

antikapasiki [#9]

.

still i do think meta has changed a lot since master 1, with fade, neon, and JETT NERF first time on international LAN

NG1nS [#6]

here we go again

right? wish everyone would just chill

Neon jett and sova was nerfed, fade was introduced. The game has changed nothing else, no fluke.

.

antikapasiki [#9]

.

im saying that optic and loud doing successful then could have been a fluke due to the fact that the meta was completely new at the time, and now that teams have adapted they might do shit now

Hecking_Love_Tenz [#7]

the whole EU wasn't there

conveniently ignoring the fact that G2 was second seed from EU lmao

CorpL [#13]

still i do think meta has changed a lot since master 1, with fade, neon, and JETT NERF first time on international LAN

neon was there last time too,optic played it well

Yeah yeah yeah, fluke this, fluke that, the tournament would be real exciting if the exact same teams made every masters and placed exactly the same every time right?

Maybe underdogs winning actually make the tournament more exciting.

since_beta [#19]

neon was there last time too,optic played it well

but optic was basically the only team that was using neon then. Like we still saw jett a lot.

Hecking_Love_Tenz [#7]

the whole EU wasn't there

G2 shit on full roster fnatic, and they went there

Fluke this fluke that stupid users like u stfu

CorpL [#21]

but optic was basically the only team that was using neon then. Like we still saw jett a lot.

optic abused chamber first too

Olofboost [#10]

Loud and Zeta both weak and both were top-3

Makes you question how good Reykjavik was lol

listen skill wise this is definitely the best masters but i don't think it was that bad

NG1nS [#25]

listen skill wise this is definitely the best masters but i don't think it was that bad

I mean we sent G2 and Liquid, NA sent Guard

SENzombs [#2]

nah meta was just massively different from then compared to champions

m1 was a fluke tourney cuz no good eu teams/subs/or travel restricts were there
zeta wouldnt make it out of groups cuz of fnc, drx
g2 shit team wouldnt make it out of groups tho
fpx would roll as 1st seed

sentinelmain377 [#27]

m1 was a fluke tourney cuz no good eu teams/subs/or travel restricts were there
zeta wouldnt make it out of groups cuz of fnc, drx
g2 shit team wouldnt make it out of groups tho
fpx would roll as 1st seed

fair

Okayyyyyy [#5]

There’s never been a team on a good run that this website has not tried to claim is a fluke. A lot of donkeys roam this site

Gambit era from Master 3 and champion.. otherwise no one really stayed at the top

Loud biggest fluke in valorant history

bro after jett nerf jett players actually exposed KEKW

Ullyr [#31]

bro after jett nerf jett players actually exposed KEKW

f0rsaken too