FPX 2-0
ACE
M3C
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.99 1.41 0.35 | 238 302 144 | 16 13 3 | / 18 10 8 / | 8 4 4 | -2 +3 -5 | 80% 75% 88% | 157 188 111 | 36% 38% 33% | 2 1 1 | 2 0 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.98 0.78 1.28 | 204 182 237 | 14 7 7 | / 17 10 7 / | 4 2 2 | -3 -3 0 | 50% 50% 50% | 139 134 147 | 28% 26% 32% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.90 0.73 1.17 | 187 168 216 | 13 7 6 | / 16 10 6 / | 4 3 1 | -3 -3 0 | 50% 50% 50% | 129 115 150 | 13% 11% 14% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.61 0.90 0.19 | 131 147 108 | 9 7 2 | / 17 9 8 / | 4 2 2 | -8 -2 -6 | 60% 75% 38% | 87 94 76 | 18% 36% 5% | 2 1 1 | 3 2 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.59 0.47 0.75 | 158 135 195 | 11 6 5 | / 18 11 7 / | 6 4 2 | -7 -5 -2 | 60% 58% 63% | 99 88 114 | 19% 20% 17% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.37 2.15 0.85 | 245 318 198 | 17 10 7 | / 10 2 8 / | 9 5 4 | +7 +8 -1 | 95% 100% 92% | 157 191 135 | 32% 33% 30% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.26 1.12 1.36 | 196 180 207 | 15 5 10 | / 10 4 6 / | 4 3 1 | +5 +1 +4 | 85% 88% 83% | 132 97 156 | 38% 63% 31% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.24 1.39 1.14 | 264 263 266 | 20 8 12 | / 14 5 9 / | 2 1 1 | +6 +3 +3 | 80% 75% 83% | 173 163 179 | 29% 17% 40% | 1 1 0 | 4 2 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
1.16 1.26 1.09 | 251 312 211 | 16 8 8 | / 14 6 8 / | 9 3 6 | +2 +2 0 | 65% 63% 67% | 171 225 135 | 36% 40% 32% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.96 0.48 1.27 | 242 153 303 | 18 5 13 | / 15 6 9 / | 1 0 1 | +3 -1 +4 | 65% 50% 75% | 160 118 187 | 50% 42% 54% | 5 1 4 | 3 1 2 | +2 0 +2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.09 1.31 1.19 | 233 200 286 | 41 19 22 | / 38 20 18 / | 15 7 8 | +3 -1 +4 | 62% 63% 61% | 166 145 191 | 27% 24% 32% | 3 1 2 | 2 2 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.82 0.97 0.89 | 192 186 213 | 34 18 16 | / 39 22 17 / | 17 8 9 | -5 -4 -1 | 70% 63% 78% | 129 124 134 | 20% 18% 23% | 7 3 4 | 4 2 2 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.79 0.99 0.89 | 202 217 190 | 36 19 17 | / 39 24 15 / | 7 6 1 | -3 -5 +2 | 60% 63% 57% | 122 136 106 | 21% 23% 19% | 7 5 2 | 7 4 3 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.84 0.88 0.86 | 177 175 200 | 32 17 15 | / 40 22 18 / | 9 5 4 | -8 -5 -3 | 62% 70% 52% | 124 114 137 | 25% 37% 13% | 5 2 3 | 8 6 2 | -3 -4 +1 | |
|
0.97 0.58 0.79 | 194 232 131 | 31 21 10 | / 41 23 18 / | 17 11 6 | -10 -2 -8 | 68% 70% 65% | 124 145 99 | 30% 29% 32% | 2 1 1 | 5 1 4 | -3 0 -3 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.70 1.28 1.47 | 252 269 241 | 47 23 24 | / 28 11 17 / | 17 10 7 | +19 +12 +7 | 86% 87% 85% | 157 165 150 | 37% 40% 34% | 3 3 0 | 2 0 2 | +1 +3 -2 | |
|
1.08 1.32 1.21 | 270 219 317 | 51 19 32 | / 39 17 22 / | 7 3 4 | +12 +2 +10 | 80% 83% 78% | 177 143 206 | 27% 20% 32% | 5 2 3 | 6 3 3 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.00 0.91 0.95 | 178 184 167 | 31 15 16 | / 32 15 17 / | 7 5 2 | -1 0 -1 | 72% 65% 78% | 122 121 122 | 42% 52% 35% | 8 4 4 | 9 6 3 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.77 1.09 0.94 | 208 190 207 | 33 13 20 | / 37 19 18 / | 16 7 9 | -4 -6 +2 | 68% 70% 67% | 142 144 140 | 40% 44% 36% | 3 0 3 | 4 2 2 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.72 0.91 0.82 | 209 182 221 | 35 16 19 | / 38 18 20 / | 9 3 6 | -3 -2 -1 | 74% 61% 85% | 134 116 149 | 36% 39% 35% | 7 2 5 | 3 1 2 | +4 +1 +3 |
ACE
M3C
ACE
M3C
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.33 1.33 1.33 | 262 213 312 | 27 12 15 | / 21 10 11 / | 11 5 6 | +6 +2 +4 | 70% 73% 67% | 184 153 215 | 27% 22% 32% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.09 1.09 1.09 | 225 228 223 | 23 12 11 | / 21 11 10 / | 11 4 7 | +2 +1 +1 | 77% 67% 87% | 149 152 145 | 22% 17% 27% | 4 2 2 | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.02 0.80 1.24 | 223 197 249 | 23 10 13 | / 23 13 10 / | 5 3 2 | 0 -3 +3 | 63% 67% 60% | 149 129 169 | 30% 38% 21% | 3 1 2 | 5 4 1 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
0.88 0.85 0.90 | 216 256 176 | 23 12 11 | / 23 14 9 / | 3 3 0 | 0 -2 +2 | 67% 73% 60% | 117 152 82 | 28% 29% 25% | 5 3 2 | 6 3 3 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.66 0.61 0.70 | 150 176 124 | 15 8 7 | / 23 13 10 / | 9 7 2 | -8 -5 -3 | 60% 67% 53% | 102 112 92 | 24% 19% 30% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.54 1.46 1.62 | 259 242 276 | 30 13 17 | / 18 9 9 / | 8 5 3 | +12 +4 +8 | 80% 80% 80% | 157 151 162 | 41% 46% 36% | 2 2 0 | 1 0 1 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
1.20 0.92 1.47 | 276 195 358 | 31 11 20 | / 25 12 13 / | 5 2 3 | +6 -1 +7 | 80% 87% 73% | 180 132 228 | 26% 23% 28% | 4 1 3 | 2 1 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.80 0.50 1.10 | 164 126 204 | 17 5 12 | / 23 13 10 / | 7 4 3 | -6 -8 +2 | 70% 73% 67% | 123 101 144 | 44% 50% 41% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.75 0.93 0.56 | 159 186 134 | 16 10 6 | / 22 11 11 / | 3 2 1 | -6 -1 -5 | 63% 53% 73% | 114 134 95 | 47% 48% 45% | 7 3 4 | 8 6 2 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
0.73 0.84 0.62 | 176 197 155 | 17 11 6 | / 23 12 11 / | 8 3 5 | -6 -1 -5 | 80% 67% 93% | 117 115 119 | 27% 38% 16% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 |
wdym def not TL are good to beat FPX and if they beat them its a close match if not then FPX win 2-0 hard
no, I don't think tl need a team game, they win if the individual is strong, and fpx has everything, defeat against acend can not be considered as the end of fpx, since they were in terrible preparation, only one player played on each card, the rest seemed to have been substituted
Can't believe these guys are still believing at TL after roughly getting out of playoffs lmao
liquid won 4 and lost 1 to the top seed in their group, same with fpx, why is it so hard to believe?
edit: my bad forgot to include that fpx even lost to acend
Because FPX is still one of the top teams at EMEA. They don't look rough at all and remember that they've beat TL 2 times at the stage 1 EMEA. Tendency is that FPX will choke it again when they have the chance to go for this Masters.
i think its ez for Acend cuz they have very good win strike so its ez and acend also had hard enemy, when in that time gambit had only hard team liquid. I think its will be 2-1, where win for acend on bind, and win for gambit on fracture and decider.
the meeting of these two teams = war of the gods.
Two VALORANT legends in history.
I cant wait for this.
ACE 2-1
ACE 2-1 GAMBIT FIRST MAP GAMBIT 13-11 WIN, 2th MAP ACEND 13-6 WIN, 3TH MAP ACEND 13-8 WIN
Why the fk are people saying FPX under this thread lmfao??? This match is between M3C and Acend FFS
its because fpx was originally on this side of the bracket but then swapped bruh use your head
Why russian team playing on champions tournament, if they're didn't openly show an attitude toward the war???
You mean the players? All of them including coach did openly share negative thoughts about the war on social medias
ATM acend is the better team but im not sure but im rooting for m3c/gambit
They do, he's a temporary coach till the time M3C find an org. But they do have a coach: https://twitter.com/Gray4er
On current form Acend should take this comfortably. But if Deffo can find his mojo might be a close game.
Hope we see a close game tho 🤞
This is a very weird game
It feels like both teams can play much better but they don't want to
so fucking dissapointed bro, what happened to the acend? this guys 13-0'd gambit on bind and now barely winning any rounds.