fnatic gonna eat optic with this lineup
boaster>fns
alfa>>>victor
mistic<<marved
derke~yay
fearoth>>>crashies
Although chet is an amazing coach, he gonna anti strat the fuck outta fnc and play some cringe comp real nice
Crashies is better than Enzo, I feel like. And so is FNS is better than boaster in IGLing. Also viktor maybe inconsistent sometimes but that doesn't mean, he is less better than alfa.
Tbh these types of comparisons are useless. You can't know how top teams for diff regions look like against each other without actually seeing them play.
Fnatic do be lookin nice tho
agree with what you said at last but, crashies and enzo cant be compared same with fns and boaster , unless we have a real match happen in between the teams. but crashies is no where near alfa, people are talking about alfa reaching top 5 in the world after some more time(probably a year) and victor isnt anywhere near that. sure victor is good but when comparing one on one alfa takes the dub
boaster>fns
alfa>>>>victor
mistic>marved (sorry but mistic underrated af, also different roles, mistic isnt controller anymore, would still say mistic is better, marved kinda overhyped atm for performing well in some matches against worse teams, he was overperforming imo, mistic is consistently better)
derke>>yay
fearoth>>crashies
mini > chet
cope? how are drx and prx good? would they beat guild, full strenght fnatic, fpx or m3c? also no1 expected shit from them, they got nothing to lose, now they have expectations, people will expect them to do well this masters, I dont think they will perform that well without having nothing to lose anymore (talking about prx), drx is just bad atm they need roster changes and coaching staff that can make them play a more sustainable branch of valorant
because NA know its just hyping up nothing else they do it for fun, I actually think that and I think most high level players in EU do, many said it too, Optic literally didnt have a challenge apart from Loud, maybe too much ego but I think last masters was just unlucky circustances and the gap is still big comparing EMEA to other regions, like, I see FPX, Fnatic and Guild, you cant tell me optic who won masters are better than them, I would even bet LAN m3c or Acend would beat Optic
not that it matters because val is a team game, but these are the only correct rankings
FNS>Boaster (FNS won a Masters and has been runner-up at berlin, Boaster only got to finals in the first masters when the game was newer)
Marved>Mistic (both are good, but marved's impact is so easy to see in comparison to mistic relying more on team to win, marved sometimes takes games into his own hands)
Alfa>Victor (Vic is a great player but Alfa is Just on another level)
Yay > Derke (Derke is a beast but has yet to really prove himself on LAN imo)
Enzo=Crashies (both good support players and aim is solid on both players)
Chet> minijake (Chet won a masters)
Optic would win 3-2 VS Fnatic imo, Optics map pool is insane
not as good tho, fans on vlr were literally shitting on victor and calling for him to be replaced until masters playoffs, he clearly isnt close to a guy who is top1 acs in the hardest region? victor is mid table in acs in a less competitive region, sorry but he is worldclass but just one more in the elite, alfajer is just the elite of the elite
ok boaster reached finals when the game was new totally agree. but fns literally won a trophy when the best region in the world wasnt there to compete that means that victory cant be taken in the same regards. if you actually believe in your point then you have to agree that optic won an easier tournament
difficult question to answer, individually, optic win. but as a team, hell no. all these comments comparing the wrong things.
boaster=fns
mistic<marved
derke=yay
alfajer>victor
enzo=<crashies (could go either way)
on paper it looks equal but we are not comparing individuals we are comparing teams and right now i have no doubt FNC take the W.