vlr wrong vetos? i think big pick bind navi pick ascent, right?
completed
... 37 more matches
Saturday, May 28th
10:00 AM EDT
Patch 4.09
NAVI ban Fracture; BIG ban Breeze; NAVI pick Bind; BIG pick Ascent; NAVI ban Icebox; BIG ban Split; Haven remains
Betting
Anonymous Betting & Instant Crypto Withdrawals
Ended
Use code VLR for $25 in free bets with first deposit.
Ended
Maps/Stats
13
BIG
9 /
4
Bind
PICK
49:16
Natus Vincere
3 /
6
9
BIG 
NAVI
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.32 0.91 1.66 | 225 184 261 | 18 6 12 | / 10 7 3 / | 3 2 1 | +8 -1 +9 | 77% 70% 83% | 153 123 178 | 48% 35% 57% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.27 0.21 2.15 | 274 138 389 | 20 4 16 | / 13 9 4 / | 9 4 5 | +7 -5 +12 | 73% 50% 92% | 205 111 284 | 19% 25% 18% | 2 1 1 | 4 4 0 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
1.26 1.55 1.03 | 193 300 105 | 15 11 4 | / 11 7 4 / | 9 2 7 | +4 +4 0 | 77% 80% 75% | 115 179 62 | 34% 46% 14% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.94 0.91 0.96 | 186 212 165 | 15 8 7 | / 16 10 6 / | 2 0 2 | -1 -2 +1 | 59% 60% 58% | 122 134 111 | 31% 50% 17% | 5 1 4 | 5 1 4 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.71 0.54 0.85 | 173 132 208 | 13 5 8 | / 19 9 10 / | 5 2 3 | -6 -4 -2 | 82% 70% 92% | 114 81 142 | 9% 5% 13% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.23 0.61 1.98 | 226 115 359 | 18 4 14 | / 14 9 5 / | 2 0 2 | +4 -5 +9 | 68% 50% 90% | 154 83 240 | 17% 14% 18% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.94 1.39 0.40 | 215 272 148 | 17 12 5 | / 16 8 8 / | 1 0 1 | +1 +4 -3 | 68% 75% 60% | 125 155 90 | 38% 39% 35% | 4 2 2 | 2 0 2 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
|
0.87 0.74 1.03 | 207 208 207 | 15 8 7 | / 18 11 7 / | 4 2 2 | -3 -3 0 | 55% 25% 90% | 138 137 139 | 31% 33% 27% | 3 1 2 | 4 4 0 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
|
0.83 0.42 1.32 | 139 60 236 | 9 1 8 | / 15 10 5 / | 9 7 2 | -6 -9 +3 | 73% 67% 80% | 94 38 161 | 16% 7% 19% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.53 0.27 0.85 | 138 66 226 | 10 2 8 | / 18 10 8 / | 7 3 4 | -8 -8 0 | 64% 50% 80% | 84 50 124 | 11% 5% 18% | 1 0 1 | 4 3 1 | -3 -3 0 |
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0.79 1.36 1.06 | 206 171 249 | 45 19 26 | / 40 26 14 / | 12 7 5 | +5 -7 +12 | 67% 56% 80% | 137 115 161 | 29% 22% 36% | 6 3 3 | 8 6 2 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
0.52 1.52 0.99 | 214 158 284 | 47 17 30 | / 44 28 16 / | 18 12 6 | +3 -11 +14 | 63% 50% 77% | 152 115 194 | 22% 27% 19% | 9 4 5 | 11 10 1 | -2 -6 +4 | |
|
1.16 0.78 0.98 | 196 243 146 | 45 30 15 | / 47 28 19 / | 7 1 6 | -2 +2 -4 | 61% 62% 60% | 130 154 104 | 28% 38% 17% | 8 3 5 | 6 2 4 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.09 0.79 0.95 | 166 217 112 | 36 24 12 | / 42 26 16 / | 20 10 10 | -6 -2 -4 | 67% 71% 63% | 107 136 74 | 22% 28% 13% | 2 1 1 | 5 2 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.58 0.77 0.67 | 156 124 193 | 34 15 19 | / 50 28 22 / | 11 6 5 | -16 -13 -3 | 70% 62% 80% | 106 87 128 | 16% 16% 16% | 2 0 2 | 7 3 4 | -5 -3 -2 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.96 1.42 1.20 | 252 221 277 | 58 23 35 | / 46 24 22 / | 14 6 8 | +12 -1 +13 | 73% 53% 91% | 162 140 182 | 31% 31% 32% | 10 3 7 | 6 6 0 | +4 -3 +7 | |
|
|
0.94 1.29 1.13 | 206 147 259 | 47 15 32 | / 39 18 21 / | 9 6 3 | +8 -3 +11 | 72% 70% 74% | 130 103 154 | 16% 24% 13% | 12 4 8 | 4 1 3 | +8 +3 +5 | |
|
|
0.75 1.45 1.12 | 215 153 269 | 50 16 34 | / 41 22 19 / | 23 10 13 | +9 -6 +15 | 72% 67% 76% | 129 90 164 | 21% 15% 25% | 7 2 5 | 9 7 2 | -2 -5 +3 | |
|
|
1.23 0.68 0.94 | 183 228 146 | 40 24 16 | / 41 19 22 / | 12 4 8 | -1 +5 -6 | 67% 77% 59% | 120 150 93 | 22% 22% 22% | 6 3 3 | 6 0 6 | 0 +3 -3 | |
|
|
0.75 0.95 0.85 | 141 119 159 | 28 11 17 | / 40 20 20 / | 31 13 18 | -12 -9 -3 | 78% 77% 79% | 88 69 105 | 18% 21% 17% | 2 2 0 | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 |
9
BIG
5 /
4
Ascent
PICK
50:23
Natus Vincere
7 /
6
13
BIG
NAVI
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.09 0.93 1.28 | 224 185 271 | 16 7 9 | / 13 8 5 / | 4 2 2 | +3 -1 +4 | 64% 58% 70% | 148 125 175 | 22% 16% 28% | 5 3 2 | 1 1 0 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
|
1.00 1.40 0.52 | 245 326 147 | 19 14 5 | / 17 9 8 / | 2 1 1 | +2 +5 -3 | 64% 75% 50% | 158 204 103 | 24% 31% 15% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
|
0.94 0.79 1.14 | 238 227 253 | 17 9 8 | / 16 9 7 / | 6 5 1 | +1 0 +1 | 64% 67% 60% | 156 164 147 | 28% 40% 17% | 4 2 2 | 3 2 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
|
0.88 1.01 0.72 | 179 210 144 | 14 9 5 | / 16 9 7 / | 4 2 2 | -2 0 -2 | 64% 75% 50% | 111 119 103 | 23% 32% 14% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
|
0.70 0.59 0.84 | 138 119 162 | 10 5 5 | / 13 9 4 / | 6 4 2 | -3 -4 +1 | 82% 75% 90% | 101 86 118 | 21% 31% 12% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.50 1.17 1.78 | 270 223 310 | 22 8 14 | / 13 6 7 / | 6 2 4 | +9 +2 +7 | 68% 70% 67% | 168 134 198 | 35% 32% 37% | 4 1 3 | 4 3 1 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
|
1.41 1.27 1.52 | 237 234 241 | 20 9 11 | / 15 7 8 / | 5 1 4 | +5 +2 +3 | 77% 70% 83% | 162 142 179 | 35% 31% 40% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
|
0.97 1.16 0.82 | 191 153 224 | 14 5 9 | / 16 5 11 / | 7 6 1 | -2 0 -2 | 68% 100% 42% | 119 109 127 | 12% 27% 4% | 4 2 2 | 4 1 3 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
|
0.83 1.05 0.65 | 170 231 121 | 12 8 4 | / 16 8 8 / | 4 1 3 | -4 0 -4 | 64% 70% 58% | 124 169 86 | 17% 13% 20% | 0 0 0 | 3 0 3 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
|
0.60 0.58 0.63 | 109 96 121 | 7 3 4 | / 16 6 10 / | 11 4 7 | -9 -3 -6 | 73% 80% 67% | 66 51 78 | 17% 23% 14% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 |
7
BIG
4 /
3
Haven
38:02
Natus Vincere
8 /
5
13
BIG
NAVI
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.02 1.14 0.83 | 157 185 117 | 11 8 3 | / 14 9 5 / | 3 0 3 | -3 -1 -2 | 60% 50% 75% | 109 119 93 | 32% 41% 21% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
|
0.73 0.54 1.01 | 169 148 202 | 11 6 5 | / 17 11 6 / | 5 3 2 | -6 -5 -1 | 60% 42% 88% | 107 99 118 | 19% 18% 20% | 0 0 0 | 5 4 1 | -5 -4 -1 | |
|
|
0.73 0.51 1.07 | 130 107 165 | 10 4 6 | / 15 10 5 / | 3 3 0 | -5 -6 +1 | 50% 33% 75% | 89 70 117 | 19% 10% 40% | 3 1 2 | 4 4 0 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
|
0.69 0.80 0.53 | 125 154 84 | 7 4 3 | / 15 10 5 / | 7 6 1 | -8 -6 -2 | 60% 58% 63% | 93 117 56 | 10% 10% 8% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
|
0.60 0.60 0.58 | 157 122 210 | 11 5 6 | / 18 10 8 / | 0 0 0 | -7 -5 -2 | 45% 42% 50% | 104 95 119 | 20% 15% 23% | 0 0 0 | 5 3 2 | -5 -3 -2 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.35 0.96 1.61 | 236 195 264 | 18 6 12 | / 10 6 4 / | 10 5 5 | +8 0 +8 | 85% 88% 83% | 137 97 163 | 15% 10% 18% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
|
1.34 0.89 1.64 | 312 225 371 | 23 6 17 | / 13 6 7 / | 5 3 2 | +10 0 +10 | 90% 75% 100% | 190 141 222 | 29% 26% 30% | 6 1 5 | 2 2 0 | +4 -1 +5 | |
|
|
1.18 1.17 1.19 | 200 187 210 | 15 6 9 | / 9 4 5 / | 0 0 0 | +6 +2 +4 | 80% 63% 92% | 116 126 110 | 18% 31% 13% | 5 1 4 | 0 0 0 | +5 +1 +4 | |
|
|
1.15 1.45 0.96 | 174 235 134 | 12 7 5 | / 9 4 5 / | 11 2 9 | +3 +3 0 | 90% 88% 92% | 107 137 86 | 22% 33% 15% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
|
1.05 1.21 0.94 | 164 157 169 | 11 4 7 | / 9 3 6 / | 7 3 4 | +2 +1 +1 | 70% 88% 58% | 109 118 103 | 16% 17% 15% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 |
Head-to-head
Past Matches
That is an interesting opinion, but he still would be better than Obnoks and probably by far, Obnoks really is doing a lot of fundamental mistakes that costs BIG a lot of rounds, the way he just decides to peek things seems weird. I personally think that Magnum could be a good fit for BIG with his expercience in Tier 1 other than that he is also is grinding a lot which could mean that he may be even improving, which I didn't see from Obnoks at all in recent times, that guy is still dry peeking a lot and his utility usage is just not good enough/ or not impressive with the agents he plays.
Bro the only reason Magnum and old Fnatic were relevant and belonged to tier1 was Derke
Derke won them rounds, maps, series, without him they'd be worthess garbage
You should stop overrating players just because they've been to several LANs and they have so-called experience, it doesn't make them any better than others
Discord