V1 2-1 C9
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.45 1.85 1.09 | 270 333 214 | 23 14 9 | / 13 5 8 / | 1 0 1 | +10 +9 +1 | 83% 100% 67% | 151 188 117 | 16% 27% 5% | 8 5 3 | 0 0 0 | +8 +5 +3 | |
|
1.22 1.53 0.93 | 189 237 145 | 17 10 7 | / 13 6 7 / | 6 4 2 | +4 +4 0 | 78% 91% 67% | 121 135 108 | 35% 40% 31% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.98 0.58 1.35 | 237 150 319 | 18 5 13 | / 17 8 9 / | 6 3 3 | +1 -3 +4 | 70% 73% 67% | 154 101 203 | 21% 20% 21% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.95 1.17 0.75 | 180 247 119 | 15 10 5 | / 15 8 7 / | 3 2 1 | 0 +2 -2 | 65% 73% 58% | 126 167 89 | 30% 34% 22% | 3 3 0 | 2 1 1 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.69 0.70 0.69 | 105 134 79 | 8 5 3 | / 13 7 6 / | 4 1 3 | -5 -2 -3 | 65% 73% 58% | 73 100 48 | 29% 33% 23% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.93 0.90 0.97 | 201 147 262 | 16 6 10 | / 17 9 8 / | 4 3 1 | -1 -3 +2 | 74% 75% 73% | 133 97 172 | 21% 27% 19% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.91 0.91 0.90 | 177 163 192 | 16 8 8 | / 15 8 7 / | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | 65% 58% 73% | 108 96 121 | 42% 50% 37% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.90 1.65 0.07 | 189 314 54 | 15 14 1 | / 15 7 8 / | 5 2 3 | 0 +7 -7 | 57% 67% 45% | 131 206 50 | 26% 27% 20% | 1 1 0 | 5 2 3 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
0.87 0.68 1.07 | 160 102 225 | 12 3 9 | / 15 8 7 / | 5 2 3 | -3 -5 +2 | 83% 75% 91% | 118 87 151 | 31% 22% 38% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.61 0.69 0.51 | 146 140 155 | 12 6 6 | / 19 9 10 / | 4 3 1 | -7 -3 -4 | 52% 58% 45% | 97 84 112 | 32% 9% 50% | 2 1 1 | 6 2 4 | -4 -1 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.68 1.28 1.44 | 279 310 257 | 42 20 22 | / 23 9 14 / | 2 0 2 | +19 +11 +8 | 80% 94% 71% | 159 178 147 | 16% 33% 5% | 12 6 6 | 2 0 2 | +10 +6 +4 | |
|
1.55 1.20 1.34 | 273 309 226 | 37 18 19 | / 23 10 13 / | 7 4 3 | +14 +8 +6 | 75% 81% 71% | 169 197 150 | 22% 24% 19% | 9 5 4 | 2 1 1 | +7 +4 +3 | |
|
1.47 1.10 1.25 | 184 212 166 | 29 13 16 | / 20 8 12 / | 13 10 3 | +9 +5 +4 | 78% 88% 71% | 117 127 110 | 28% 39% 21% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.75 0.89 0.83 | 182 169 206 | 26 9 17 | / 28 11 17 / | 10 5 5 | -2 -2 0 | 73% 75% 71% | 121 103 134 | 24% 24% 25% | 3 1 2 | 4 2 2 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.79 0.79 0.79 | 162 170 142 | 20 9 11 | / 24 11 13 / | 10 3 7 | -4 -2 -2 | 78% 81% 75% | 98 115 87 | 21% 21% 21% | 3 1 2 | 2 0 2 | +1 +1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.22 0.64 0.99 | 223 242 183 | 28 19 9 | / 29 16 13 / | 8 4 4 | -1 +3 -4 | 63% 63% 63% | 144 163 116 | 30% 22% 52% | 1 1 0 | 6 3 3 | -5 -2 -3 | |
|
0.97 0.95 0.96 | 178 152 213 | 22 11 11 | / 28 16 12 / | 18 10 8 | -6 -5 -1 | 85% 79% 94% | 120 98 154 | 30% 26% 35% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.97 0.62 0.81 | 162 178 143 | 25 17 8 | / 29 17 12 / | 2 1 1 | -4 0 -4 | 65% 71% 56% | 103 109 94 | 44% 48% 39% | 4 4 0 | 4 2 2 | 0 +2 -2 | |
|
0.79 0.79 0.79 | 175 148 227 | 25 12 13 | / 32 19 13 / | 5 4 1 | -7 -7 0 | 63% 58% 69% | 119 101 148 | 25% 28% 22% | 3 2 1 | 6 4 2 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.47 0.49 0.48 | 131 122 151 | 18 10 8 | / 36 21 15 / | 7 4 3 | -18 -11 -7 | 55% 58% 50% | 87 71 111 | 27% 14% 41% | 2 1 1 | 9 5 4 | -7 -4 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.86 2.39 1.64 | 366 445 333 | 22 8 14 | / 8 2 6 / | 4 2 2 | +14 +6 +8 | 88% 100% 83% | 228 265 212 | 16% 13% 18% | 6 2 4 | 0 0 0 | +6 +2 +4 | |
|
1.41 1.28 1.47 | 287 258 300 | 19 6 13 | / 10 4 6 / | 1 0 1 | +9 +2 +7 | 76% 80% 75% | 170 155 176 | 17% 50% 5% | 4 1 3 | 2 0 2 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.29 1.35 1.27 | 178 156 188 | 12 3 9 | / 7 2 5 / | 7 6 1 | +5 +1 +4 | 76% 80% 75% | 112 109 113 | 18% 38% 12% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.92 0.98 0.89 | 218 250 205 | 12 4 8 | / 11 4 7 / | 6 2 4 | +1 0 +1 | 94% 100% 92% | 133 148 126 | 16% 11% 20% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.64 1.14 0.43 | 127 212 93 | 8 4 4 | / 11 3 8 / | 4 2 2 | -3 +1 -4 | 76% 80% 75% | 76 106 64 | 33% 29% 40% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.11 0.78 1.88 | 257 170 467 | 13 5 8 | / 14 9 5 / | 3 2 1 | -1 -4 +3 | 71% 58% 100% | 162 120 262 | 35% 15% 77% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.10 1.27 0.69 | 196 202 185 | 10 8 2 | / 13 8 5 / | 13 8 5 | -3 0 -3 | 88% 83% 100% | 124 108 162 | 29% 29% 30% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.67 1.03 0.02 | 146 193 36 | 9 9 0 | / 14 9 5 / | 1 1 0 | -5 0 -5 | 65% 83% 20% | 97 122 36 | 48% 47% 50% | 2 2 0 | 3 1 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.59 0.68 0.39 | 148 148 149 | 9 6 3 | / 15 10 5 / | 1 1 0 | -6 -4 -2 | 47% 42% 60% | 101 105 94 | 30% 29% 33% | 1 1 0 | 4 3 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.31 0.26 0.44 | 115 104 142 | 6 4 2 | / 17 12 5 / | 3 1 2 | -11 -8 -3 | 59% 58% 60% | 73 59 108 | 23% 18% 31% | 0 0 0 | 3 3 0 | -3 -3 0 |
Acro_ [#3]C9 2-1 V1
just because V1 beat a 5th (Sen) and 4th (Optic) in NA doesnt mean they can beat C9, the best in NA is C9 2nd is V1
Acro_ [#4]just because V1 beat a 5th (Sen) and 4th (Optic) in NA doesnt mean they can beat C9, the best in NA is C9 2nd is V1
agreed, if they dont choke and get to grand finals it could go either way tbh
justron40 [#9]C9 2-1 V1
gotta stick to my pickem
Its says Bo3 below the days counting down to the match bozo, and i think only lbf and gf are bo5 for NA
Acro_ [#10]Its says Bo3 below the days counting down to the match bozo, and i think only lbf and gf are bo5 for NA
it's not updated yet because it happens in more than a week later.
justron40 [#11]it's not updated yet because it happens in more than a week later.
no i’m pretty sure it’s a BO3 because the bo5 is the grand final this is upper final
optic 2-1, MARK MY WORDS, no team in NA COMES CLOSE to how well optic uses util and plays as a team. every other team in na like sen, xset, tgrd, c9, has to rely on individuals, I am confident that optic is the only team in NA who can win a game with both of their star players missing, while valorant is about adaptation, its hard to see a better team in NA than optic TBH. Sometimes they get outgunned but if they are hitting I think they are easiliy NA's best.
BIGGEST_LG_FAN [#27]optic 2-1, MARK MY WORDS, no team in NA COMES CLOSE to how well optic uses util and plays as a team. every other team in na like sen, xset, tgrd, c9, has to rely on individuals, I am confident that optic is the only team in NA who can win a game with both of their star players missing, while valorant is about adaptation, its hard to see a better team in NA than optic TBH. Sometimes they get outgunned but if they are hitting I think they are easiliy NA's best.
they lost to x10 lol
unknown_trash [#22]i think it will be an LG 2-1 optic. everyone will underestimate them until they destroy everyone
nah, optic is na's best team
KoreanOverlord [#28]they lost to x10 lol
lan is different, your vision strikers would know that, also notice how I said "no team in NA" :D
Acro_ [#4]just because V1 beat a 5th (Sen) and 4th (Optic) in NA doesnt mean they can beat C9, the best in NA is C9 2nd is V1
Lol this didn't age well
AVE_TRUE_TO_CAESAR [#40]trent gonna sova diff crashies hard
sayaplayer is a much more consistent oper than yay imo
last time I checked Sayaplayer wasn't consistent against C9
KoreanOverlord [#28]they lost to x10 lol
They lost to X10 when Victor was in bad conditioning. Nice
BIGGEST_LG_FAN [#27]optic 2-1, MARK MY WORDS, no team in NA COMES CLOSE to how well optic uses util and plays as a team. every other team in na like sen, xset, tgrd, c9, has to rely on individuals, I am confident that optic is the only team in NA who can win a game with both of their star players missing, while valorant is about adaptation, its hard to see a better team in NA than optic TBH. Sometimes they get outgunned but if they are hitting I think they are easiliy NA's best.
I dont think optic can win without yay popping off. optic is so inconsistent. but when they are in good form they are so much better than NA other teams.
MrN00b7 [#1]V1 2-1 C9
Good luck to both teams! The team that wins this match will qualify for Masters Iceland!
AVE_TRUE_TO_CAESAR [#40]trent gonna sova diff crashies hard
sayaplayer is a much more consistent oper than yay imo
Trash opinion, yay is best player NA, owns that fraud
AVE_TRUE_TO_CAESAR [#40]trent gonna sova diff crashies hard
sayaplayer is a much more consistent oper than yay imo
lol how delusional are u if think sayaplayer is more consistent on op than yayster
hehe444 [#47]I dont think optic can win without yay popping off. optic is so inconsistent. but when they are in good form they are so much better than NA other teams.
optic really isnt that inconsistent, since beta, them and sen have been the most consistent teams in NA. Plus every team relies on their jett to pop off.
Optic 2-0 or 2-1 in worst case scenario. I don't see a world where Guard beats Optic. Guard only really plays Haven, Icebox, Bind and a bit of Ascent. With Optic's win today against C9 I think its evident that Optic is way better on Bind and Ascent than any other NA team, and clearly much better on Haven than Guard. Guard haven't been looking as good on Haven, and their only "good" map is icebox which I guess Optic would ban immediately.
BIGGEST_LG_FAN [#29]nah, optic is na's best team
Ayo hold up you're cheering on the wrong team, but I agree
MEMEMINISTER [#56]Funny how c9 & V1 both are the most mentioned teams in the thread and none of them made it to the upper finals.
top seed means nothing because of old patch and because it gives you nothing in playoffs(not even start in upper round 2 like in emea)
so team that achived it obviosly fought for nothing
DayZ- [#59]Optic 2-0 or 2-1 in worst case scenario. I don't see a world where Guard beats Optic. Guard only really plays Haven, Icebox, Bind and a bit of Ascent. With Optic's win today against C9 I think its evident that Optic is way better on Bind and Ascent than any other NA team, and clearly much better on Haven than Guard. Guard haven't been looking as good on Haven, and their only "good" map is icebox which I guess Optic would ban immediately.
Icebox unstoppable Haven solid Bind is deadly Fracture solid Split not much data Ascent great both always perma ban breeze I don’t see ur point
Cylo [#70]As a SEN fan just promise me whoever makes it to Reykjavik just bring it home for NA
felt that bro
Cylo [#69]I wish SEN was here 😪
all good I believe that SEN will learn this run and bounce back for sure with a better comp read and form
Cylo [#70]As a SEN fan just promise me whoever makes it to Reykjavik just bring it home for NA
The Guard will bring it home no kapp
Hampoise [#62]Icebox unstoppable Haven solid Bind is deadly Fracture solid Split not much data Ascent great both always perma ban breeze I don’t see ur point
Bind is deadly? they might be one of the better teams on bind but not the best which i believe Optic is. Their Ascent is in no way great lmao wtf
hehe444 [#46]Optic are so inconsistent. I dont think optic going masters is good for NA.
Optic have gotten so much better since their first loss against Rise. Wouldn't be surprised if they fix it all and own everyone in masters
DayZ- [#59]Optic 2-0 or 2-1 in worst case scenario. I don't see a world where Guard beats Optic. Guard only really plays Haven, Icebox, Bind and a bit of Ascent. With Optic's win today against C9 I think its evident that Optic is way better on Bind and Ascent than any other NA team, and clearly much better on Haven than Guard. Guard haven't been looking as good on Haven, and their only "good" map is icebox which I guess Optic would ban immediately.
guard going to ban haven for sure. they are really predictable on haven
Cylo [#70]As a SEN fan just promise me whoever makes it to Reykjavik just bring it home for NA
Can't wait to see sayaplayer the last hope for American valorant
Acro_ [#4]just because V1 beat a 5th (Sen) and 4th (Optic) in NA doesnt mean they can beat C9, the best in NA is C9 2nd is V1
Optic beat Cloud9, so what?
Femly [#85]fns with word.exe
optic 2-0
fns without word.exe
guard 2-0
Bro i told you go to a therapist
Lewkiss [#88]Huge OpTiC fan, love all the individuals and love watching them play. I really hope they take lot's of time to focus on this match over the next few days before this game with The Guard. Trying to stay optimistic OpTic 2-0
So brother use optic flair and join the underlord optic gang
SENBobstar [#15]Bro Saya vs YAY gonna be lit!! 🔥
Bro Guard gonna put in PROD as a sub for one map if they up. (For anyone that doesn't know, which I'm sure u guys already do, Prod is signed to Guard as a Content Creator)
Cylo [#70]As a SEN fan just promise me whoever makes it to Reykjavik just bring it home for NA
ikr, I'm an OpTic fan, but in the end I root for NA above all.
pewpew [#93]Dude, I am watching EMEA Challengers and no way NA wins against EU. It's almost like if they got so much better and NA got much worse lol.
You're braindead. the fact the SEN fell off, and other teams have passed them, shows how much NA has gotten better.
Revlo [#97]You're braindead. the fact the SEN fell off, and other teams have passed them, shows how much NA has gotten better.
do you even watch the games lol. The synergy is completely off for SEN and its not any better for NA teams compared to EMEA top teams. Your whole family is braindead LMAO.
SENBobstar [#95]Bro Guard gonna put in PROD as a sub for one map if they up. (For anyone that doesn't know, which I'm sure u guys already do, Prod is signed to Guard as a Content Creator)
W guard if they do that in seeding match
Lewkiss [#88]Huge OpTiC fan, love all the individuals and love watching them play. I really hope they take lot's of time to focus on this match over the next few days before this game with The Guard. Trying to stay optimistic OpTic 2-0
welcome to the greenwall where we pray everyday to our gods hoping for a FNS stream
Hampoise [#62]Icebox unstoppable Haven solid Bind is deadly Fracture solid Split not much data Ascent great both always perma ban breeze I don’t see ur point
optic went toe to toe with gambit on bind and demolished V1 and cloud9 on ascent , their icebox dogshit though
hehe444 [#46]Optic are so inconsistent. I dont think optic going masters is good for NA.
quite the opposite optic is the only teams that has consistently reached NA challengers semifinals every time they played it, if optic qualifies for iceland after beating guard , they will have played more matches on international LANs than any other NA team .
But its also quite obvious why they arent as popular as sentinels or Guard or 100T...They make dogshit content
Chocolate_Mint_Icecream [#105]welcome to the greenwall where we pray everyday to our gods hoping for a FNS stream
Agreed 💯
DogeForPres [#104]W guard if they do that in seeding match
I respect the Guard cuz they put fans first, the viewers get the best experience. Their video producers are crazy talented as well 🔥
OpTic have consistently played in every big event in NA. Sure, they’ve often finished 2-8th in those events, unlike SEN who won most of them in 2021. But, with the downfall of SEN, OpTic is clearly the most consistent team left in NA. I think they take this one and qualify. Let’s go ex-Wardell-teammates FNS and yay.
pewpew [#101]do you even watch the games lol. The synergy is completely off for SEN and its not any better for NA teams compared to EMEA top teams. Your whole family is braindead LMAO.
Were you born this stupid and arrogant or did you evolve?
pssssss [#117]Were you born this stupid and arrogant or did you evolve?
there you go, another one with braindead family. You surely were born stupid and arrogant with that type of comments lol. Uneducated motherfucker, your mom is proud of you for being stupid LMAOOO
User011098 [#120]2-0 guard optic not there yet they still need experience like the guard👍
Man said optic needs experience and not guard🤣
juno_VLR [#115]OpTic have consistently played in every big event in NA. Sure, they’ve often finished 2-8th in those events, unlike SEN who won most of them in 2021. But, with the downfall of SEN, OpTic is clearly the most consistent team left in NA. I think they take this one and qualify. Let’s go ex-Wardell-teammates FNS and yay.
Well, sentinels have been amazing since the beginning vs optic who's been good since masters 3
VALoka [#145]net trollin
He is doing his best lol. Net is just losing gun fights, not "trolling" with bad positioning or non-sense peeks.
DogeForPres [#104]W guard if they do that in seeding match
Are you saying this is a seeding match? It's literally to qualify for Iceland. Only the grand final is a seeding match.
celouzemkar [#149]This stupid idiot`s pick attack on Optic map, so stupid, win only one pistol round, Guard so stupud like my 97 y.o. grandma, they have zero brain
They wanted to lose faster. That's why
Sprouts [#152]Trolled the map picks so fucking bad :(
Why would you pick split over icebox or even haven
I agree!
Acro_ [#4]just because V1 beat a 5th (Sen) and 4th (Optic) in NA doesnt mean they can beat C9, the best in NA is C9 2nd is V1
optic on top rn, unlucky
SilentCypher [#170]Dare I say they didn't get the chance to perform on their usual level as Saya didn't get to play Jett. Both maps needed Raze so the picks were kinda weird. I do believe Saya's impact with Jett and especially her ult is something that's terrifying
and I hope you know that yay is a different level than Saya
Wardy [#147]Are you saying this is a seeding match? It's literally to qualify for Iceland. Only the grand final is a seeding match.
no im saying if guard qualify and play prod in seeding