They won't lost today sorry haters
⣞⢽⢪⢣⢣⢣⢫⡺⡵⣝⡮⣗⢷⢽⢽⢽⣮⡷⡽⣜⣜⢮⢺⣜⢷⢽⢝⡽⣝
⠸⡸⠜⠕⠕⠁⢁⢇⢏⢽⢺⣪⡳⡝⣎⣏⢯⢞⡿⣟⣷⣳⢯⡷⣽⢽⢯⣳⣫⠇
⠀⠀⢀⢀⢄⢬⢪⡪⡎⣆⡈⠚⠜⠕⠇⠗⠝⢕⢯⢫⣞⣯⣿⣻⡽⣏⢗⣗⠏⠀
⠀⠪⡪⡪⣪⢪⢺⢸⢢⢓⢆⢤⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢊⢞⡾⣿⡯⣏⢮⠷⠁⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠈⠊⠆⡃⠕⢕⢇⢇⢇⢇⢇⢏⢎⢎⢆⢄⠀⢑⣽⣿⢝⠲⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡿⠂⠠⠀⡇⢇⠕⢈⣀⠀⠁⠡⠣⡣⡫⣂⣿⠯⢪⠰⠂⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⡦⡙⡂⢀⢤⢣⠣⡈⣾⡃⠠⠄⠀⡄⢱⣌⣶⢏⢊⠂⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢝⡲⣜⡮⡏⢎⢌⢂⠙⠢⠐⢀⢘⢵⣽⣿⡿⠁⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠨⣺⡺⡕⡕⡱⡑⡆⡕⡅⡕⡜⡼⢽⡻⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⣳⣫⣾⣵⣗⡵⡱⡡⢣⢑⢕⢜⢕⡝⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⣴⣿⣾⣿⣿⣿⡿⡽⡑⢌⠪⡢⡣⣣⡟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⡟⡾⣿⢿⢿⢵⣽⣾⣼⣘⢸⢸⣞⡟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠁⠇⠡⠩⡫⢿⣝⡻⡮⣒⢽⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
peppreish [#2]doesn't matter, rise are genuinely not that good SEN shouldn't have lost map 1 to them imo
opTic lost 2 maps to them lmao
peppreish [#2]doesn't matter, rise are genuinely not that good SEN shouldn't have lost map 1 to them imo
if the Rise from the OpTic game showed up they had a legit chance of even sweeping them
peppreish [#2]doesn't matter, rise are genuinely not that good SEN shouldn't have lost map 1 to them imo
well they did beat optic in a match.
andreziN [#14]VIVO KEYD WILL NOT DESTROY SENTINELS
BECAUSE SENTINELS WILL NEVER GO TO MASTERS/CHAMPS ANYMORE
who ??? Glitched cam abusers ?? (cheaters more likely)
peppreish [#2]doesn't matter, rise are genuinely not that good SEN shouldn't have lost map 1 to them imo
"rise are genuinely not that good"
Won vs. Optic who are top 3 NA but that doesnt matter right?
peppreish [#11]yeah in their vct opener lmao, not after like 4 weeks
its still group stage bruh they qualified.
StrongGhostMayor [#19]"rise are genuinely not that good"
Won vs. Optic who are top 3 NA but that doesnt matter right?
#12 genius
andreziN [#14]VIVO KEYD WILL NOT DESTROY SENTINELS
BECAUSE SENTINELS WILL NEVER GO TO MASTERS/CHAMPS ANYMORE
Andrezin You remind me of trembolona commenting, who really are you 🐢
peppreish [#11]yeah in their vct opener lmao, not after like 4 weeks
A win is a win 4 weeks later or not does not matter.
peppreish [#23]no way u think today's win was something to be proud of for SEN lmao
never said they should be proud, just saying that optic lost to rise
andreziN [#14]VIVO KEYD WILL NOT DESTROY SENTINELS
BECAUSE SENTINELS WILL NEVER GO TO MASTERS/CHAMPS ANYMORE
vk would win even without cam
peppreish [#23]no way u think today's win was something to be proud of for SEN lmao
doesn't take away from anything, a win is a win no matter how sloppy it was
Blazieboy [#28]A win is a win 4 weeks later or not does not matter.
it really does, you must be delusional to think it doesn't. optic didn't enter a single competition since champions, it's pretty obvious that a first week result holds much less value than one in the 4th week of matches
xDillan [#7]Sen are the tier 1.5 gatekeepers. still not in NA top 5
Sen just gets slow starts on maps and trips up at times, super easy to critique in hindsight. They're a good tier 1 team, y'all just like to be edgy and hate lol
andreziN [#14]VIVO KEYD WILL NOT DESTROY SENTINELS
BECAUSE SENTINELS WILL NEVER GO TO MASTERS/CHAMPS ANYMORE
Ok? VK won’t make masters either lmao
wewZ [#29]never said they should be proud, just saying that optic lost to rise
irrelevant then lmao, SEN aren't top3 in their region
peppreish [#32]it really does, you must be delusional to think it doesn't. optic didn't enter a single competition since champions, it's pretty obvious that a first week result holds much less value than one in the 4th week of matches
yes 1st week results matter less in group stage where it is a round robin
uhuh
peppreish [#32]it really does, you must be delusional to think it doesn't. optic didn't enter a single competition since champions, it's pretty obvious that a first week result holds much less value than one in the 4th week of matches
rise didnt play since lcq LMFAO you really thought you had a point
wewZ [#37]yes 1st week results matter less in group stage where it is a round robin
uhuh
you really just don't have reading comprehension huh. a week one result is less indicative of a team's level compared to their form in the latest week. should be obvious
peppreish [#39]you really just don't have reading comprehension huh. a week one result is less indicative of a team's level compared to their form in the latest week. should be obvious
the results do matter tho. The first week is as important as the last if you want to qualify
blueberry [#38]rise didnt play since lcq LMFAO you really thought you had a point
theres no way u have above 100 iq, it doesn't matter if they didn't play since lcq since they literally went 1-6 on maps after 1st week, and optic went 4-1 on maps
ffffffff [#43]Optic lost a map vs Sen LUL
doesn't have anything to do with what i said, c9, optic, and guard are better than SEN atm lol
wewZ [#41]the results do matter tho. The first week is as important as the last if you want to qualify
nobody said the results don't matter? you're just making strawman points lol
peppreish [#44]theres no way u have above 100 iq, it doesn't matter if they didn't play since lcq since they literally went 1-6 on maps after 1st week, and optic went 4-1 on maps
lmao malding, rise had way more time not playing in tourney but still beat optic
50iq moment
peppreish [#44]theres no way u have above 100 iq, it doesn't matter if they didn't play since lcq since they literally went 1-6 on maps after 1st week, and optic went 4-1 on maps
ok? completely ignoring the fact that I shattered your initial argument then changed your point, the first week is as important as the last. teams might not be at their best potential, that doesn't mean every game is a throwaway just because they havent played in a bit.
peppreish [#46]nobody said the results don't matter? you're just making strawman points lol
"a week one result is less indicative of a team's level compared to their form in the latest week"
blueberry [#49]ok? completely ignoring the fact that I shattered your initial argument then changed your point, the first week is as important as the last. teams might not be at their best potential, that doesn't mean every game is a throwaway just because they havent played in a bit.
"shattered your initial point", bro what? you just didn't understand my point. i clearly said 1st week results are not as indicative of form as the later weeks, because teams need to get back into the groove of competitive valorant. you then made irrelevant points and thought you did something LMAO. nobody called 1st week a throwaway, it's just irrelevant to point out to my initial statement
peppreish [#45]doesn't have anything to do with what i said, c9, optic, and guard are better than SEN atm lol
do you type a single sentence without lol or lmao
wewZ [#48]lmao malding, rise had way more time not playing in tourney but still beat optic
50iq moment
dude thinks i'm mad over a vlr thread lmao. you're just repeating the same point he made that i refuted. please learn to read i beg
feelsbadboaster [#52]do you type a single sentence without lol or lmao
can u not read 2 lines above what u replied to
peppreish [#51]"shattered your initial point", bro what? you just didn't understand my point. i clearly said 1st week results are not as indicative of form as the later weeks, because teams need to get back into the groove of competitive valorant. you then made irrelevant points and thought you did something LMAO. nobody called 1st week a throwaway, it's just irrelevant to point out to my initial statement
optic didn't enter a single competition since champions
broke that point EASILY.
also you said;
it's pretty obvious that a first week result holds much less value than one in the 4th week of matches
its pretty clear you thought week one wasnt important now your backtracking cuz u got called out
blueberry [#55]optic didn't enter a single competition since champions
broke that point EASILY.
also you said;
it's pretty obvious that a first week result holds much less value than one in the 4th week of matches
its pretty clear you thought week one wasnt important now your backtracking cuz u got called out
you legit can't read lol. i said that optic's loss to rise was after a break of not playing, and that their later play showed their true form. rise's later play showed their true form as well. what can you not understand from that?
there's no backtracking, you just don't understand context or words in general. a first week results holds less value in terms of current form compared to a 4th week result. don't know how else you could interpret that
peppreish [#45]doesn't have anything to do with what i said, c9, optic, and guard are better than SEN atm lol
that wasnt your initial point
wewZ [#57]that wasnt your initial point
yeah my initial point was that SEN shouldn't have lost map 1. i never backed down from that genius
peppreish [#53]dude thinks i'm mad over a vlr thread lmao. you're just repeating the same point he made that i refuted. please learn to read i beg
uhuh refuted yes
peppreish [#58]yeah my initial point was that SEN shouldn't have lost map 1. i never backed down from that genius
"yeah in their vct opener lmao, not after like 4 weeks"
-referring to optic losing
+1st week or 4th week, it is still part of the same group stage. So both are as relevant. If you go to like last year's champions, the results of that isn't as relevant rn because it isn't part of this group stage. But the first week all the way to the last week is part of the same group stage which means all results are equally as valid
wewZ [#60]"yeah in their vct opener lmao, not after like 4 weeks"
-referring to optic losing+1st week or 4th week, it is still part of the same group stage. So both are as relevant. If you go to like last year's champions, the results of that isn't as relevant rn because it isn't part of this group stage. But the first week all the way to the last week is part of the same group stage which means all results are equally as valid
i swear you haven't been reading a single one of my replies, you've said the same thing over and over. i've clarified your misunderstanding many times; the 1st week match is not nearly as relevant to current form as the 4th week is, and optic went 4-1 in maps after that, while rise went 1-6, obviously proving how the first week was a fluke. you're just stating the same moot point that "all games are equal in the tournament", while i have clarified the true meaning of what i said many many times
peppreish [#61]i swear you haven't been reading a single one of my replies, you've said the same thing over and over. i've clarified your misunderstanding many times; the 1st week match is not nearly as relevant to current form as the 4th week is, and optic went 4-1 in maps after that, while rise went 1-6, obviously proving how the first week was a fluke. you're just stating the same moot point that "all games are equal in the tournament", while i have clarified the true meaning of what i said many many times
consistency is part of being a good team. If a team get's "fluked" on, then they aren't consistent. Just cause they had a break doesn't mean it excuses their loss
Xerol [#33]Sen just gets slow starts on maps and trips up at times, super easy to critique in hindsight. They're a good tier 1 team, y'all just like to be edgy and hate lol
Sen strats works against tier 1.5 teams and every game they have is close. They got exposed hard by Optic. i dont see them making it top 4 at play off brackets
wewZ [#62]consistency is part of being a good team. If a team get's "fluked" on, then they aren't consistent. Just cause they had a break doesn't mean it excuses their loss
it really does excuse their loss. they've been consistent after that first week. you can't expect a team to be consistent when their matches haven't been played consistently
Rabbiit [#25]Andrezin You remind me of trembolona commenting, who really are you 🐢
im imitating him
blueberry [#55]optic didn't enter a single competition since champions
broke that point EASILY.
also you said;
it's pretty obvious that a first week result holds much less value than one in the 4th week of matches
its pretty clear you thought week one wasnt important now your backtracking cuz u got called out
yo, optic won and sen didn't make it to LAN (i think i was right :D)
wewZ [#62]consistency is part of being a good team. If a team get's "fluked" on, then they aren't consistent. Just cause they had a break doesn't mean it excuses their loss
yo, optic won and sen didn't make it to LAN (i think i was right :D)